There cannot be undefined behavior at compile time, so these warnings can be
ignored when `offsetof` is used in a static assert:
```
warning: offset of on non-standard-layout type 'AsyncTask' [-Winvalid-offsetof]
```
When using a future adapter, the resume context may not be valid after the task starts running. Only peer through the adapter when we're starting to run.
rdar://126298035
* Use the longer name ThreadSanitizer rather than TSan for the new files.
* Don't implement `tsan::consume` at all for now.
* Do the `tsan::release` for `ulock_unlock()` at the head of the function,
not at the tail.
* Add a comment to test/Sanitizers/tsan/once.swift to explain the test a
little more clearly.
rdar://110665213
Move the TSan functionality from Concurrency into Threading. Use it
in the Linux `ulock` implementation so that TSan knows about `ulock`
and will tolerate the newer `swift_once` implementation that uses it.
rdar://110665213
it is enqueued on. This way, we have the necessary bookkeeping to
escalate an executor when a task that is enqueued, is escalated.
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/101864092
status record that is already registered with the task. Provide more
versatile removeStatusRecord functions and update clients to use them
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/101864092
done the load or who need the oldStatus information after adding the
status record.
Change some of the memory barrier logic since we can take advantage of
load-through HW address dependency.
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/105634683
field of an ActiveTaskStatus can also be modified while the
TaskStatusRecord list is being modified. Make the StatusRecordLock
reentrant.
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/88093007
other threads/tasks which have a reference to the task might need to
access parts of it even if the task itself is completed.
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/88093007
We were detaching the child by just modifying the list, but the cancellation path was assuming that that would not be done without holding the task status lock.
This patch just fixes the current runtime; the back-deployment side is complicated.
Fixes rdar://88398824
We shouldn't include <windows.h> implicitly from .cpp files, but should
do it directly so that we know it's there.
Also, if we're including <windows.h>, do it at the top of the file.
rdar://90776105
SWIFT_STDLIB_SINGLE_THREADED_RUNTIME is too much of a blunt instrument here.
It covers both the Concurrency runtime and the rest of the runtime, but we'd
like to be able to have e.g. a single-threaded Concurrency runtime while
the rest of the runtime is still thread safe (for instance).
So: rename it to SWIFT_STDLIB_SINGLE_THREADED_CONCURRENCY and make it just
control the Concurrency runtime, then add a SWIFT_STDLIB_THREADING_PACKAGE
setting at the CMake/build-script level, which defines
SWIFT_STDLIB_THREADING_xxx where xxx depends on the chosen threading package.
This is especially useful on systems where there may be a choice of threading
package that you could use.
rdar://90776105
We shouldn't include <windows.h> implicitly from .cpp files, but should
do it directly so that we know it's there.
Also, if we're including <windows.h>, do it at the top of the file.
rdar://90776105
SWIFT_STDLIB_SINGLE_THREADED_RUNTIME is too much of a blunt instrument here.
It covers both the Concurrency runtime and the rest of the runtime, but we'd
like to be able to have e.g. a single-threaded Concurrency runtime while
the rest of the runtime is still thread safe (for instance).
So: rename it to SWIFT_STDLIB_SINGLE_THREADED_CONCURRENCY and make it just
control the Concurrency runtime, then add a SWIFT_STDLIB_THREADING_PACKAGE
setting at the CMake/build-script level, which defines
SWIFT_STDLIB_THREADING_xxx where xxx depends on the chosen threading package.
This is especially useful on systems where there may be a choice of threading
package that you could use.
rdar://90776105
Apply a blanket pass of including `new` for the placement new allocation
and namespacing the call to the global placement new allocator. This
should repair the Android ARMv7 builds.
Not all targets have a 16-byte type alignment guarantee. For the types
which are not naturally aligned, provide a type specific `operator new`
overload to ensure that we are properly aligning the type on allocation
as we run the risk of under-aligned allocations otherwise.
This should no longer be needed with C++17 and newer which do a two
phase `operator new` lookup preferring
`operator new(std::size, std::align_val_t)` if needed. The base type
would be fully pre-processed away. The empty base class optimization
should help ensure that we do not pay any extra size costs for the
alignment fixes.
As we are a C++14 codebase, we must locally implement some of the
standard type_traits utilities, namely `void_t`. We take the minimal
definition here, assuming that the compiler is up-to-date with C++14 DR
reports which fixed an issue in SFINAE. We use the SFINAE for detecting
the presence of the `operator new` overload to guide the over-alignment,
which is inherited through the new `swift::overaligned_type<>` base
type.
Annotate the known classes which request explicit alignment which is
non-pointer alignment. This list was identified by
`git grep ' alignas(.*) '`.
