111 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Adrian Prantl
2306563aa2 Debug info: emit the module name for types declare in a swiftmodule.
Swift SVN r6734
2013-07-30 01:17:02 +00:00
Jordan Rose
8e081367ca Basic implementation of lookupVisibleDecls() for serialized modules.
This involved threading it through ModuleLoader, as with all the other
module-generic callbacks. I plan to collapse a bit of the chaining, but
unfortunately not that much.

This brings back the CodeCompletion tests.

Swift SVN r6527
2013-07-23 23:10:28 +00:00
Jordan Rose
3087e8d5ea Add the notion of "re-exported" modules, and use that where it makes sense.
Rather than automatically re-exporting or not re-exporting every import in
a TranslationUnit, we'll eventually want to control which imports are local
(most of them) and which imports are shared with eventual module loaders.
It's probably not worth implementing this for TranslationUnit, but
LoadedModule can certainly do something here.

Currently, a LoadedModule is even more permissive than a TranslationUnit:
all imports are re-exported. We can lock down on this once we have a
re-export syntax.

Swift SVN r6523
2013-07-23 23:10:17 +00:00
Jordan Rose
110d644297 Provide a skeleton for re-exports from serialized modules...
...and use it for shadowed modules (e.g. the Clang module "Foundation"
referenced by the Swift module "Foundation"), so that we can actually
find "NSString" when building AppKit.

Additionally, record shadowed modules as dependencies, so that they can
be loaded when the adapter module is loaded.

Swift SVN r6522
2013-07-23 23:10:13 +00:00
Chris Lattner
c03d4454a0 implement support for a new [stdlib] attribute that can be slapped on an import decl.
This causes the SourceLoader to recursively parse the imported module in standard 
library mode, giving it access to the Builtin module.

This is all a terrible hack and should be ripped out with great victory someday, but 
until we have binary modules that persist the build setting used to produce the 
module, this is the best we can do.



Swift SVN r5847
2013-06-27 21:31:15 +00:00
Doug Gregor
1641477826 Eliminate lookupExtensions() and the extension cache.
This infrastructure has been replaced by the extension list on nominal
declaration, which is simpler and more efficient.


Swift SVN r5225
2013-05-20 18:26:07 +00:00
Doug Gregor
8114ce16f8 Use the list of extensions of a nominal type for name lookup into that type.
This replaces the obscure, inefficient lookup into extensions with
something more straightforward: walk all of the known extensions
(available as a simple list), then eliminate any declarations that
have been shadowed by other declarations. The shadowing rules still
need to consider the module re-export DAG, but we'll leave that for
later.

As part of this, keep track of the last time we loaded extensions for
a given nominal type. If the list of extensions is out-of-date with
respect to the global generation count (which tracks resolved module
imports), ask the modules to load any additional extensions. Only the
Clang module importer can currently load extensions in this manner.


Swift SVN r5223
2013-05-20 18:06:51 +00:00
Jordan Rose
ec1e47cbf0 Thread operator lookup through Module to ModuleLoader...
...even though Swift modules don't provide this lookup yet, and Clang
modules never will.

Swift SVN r5173
2013-05-16 00:23:10 +00:00
Joe Groff
bd59da3e9e REPL: Find completions from Clang modules.
Integrating Clang's FindVisibleDecls with Swift's by importing every decl created too much per-repl-entry compile time overhead, so as a workaround, just wire completions directly to FindVisibleDecls on the clang translation unit itself. Unfortunately this means we get completions for things Swift can't import yet, but it also means we don't have to wait 30 seconds to compile every entry after doing a completion.

Swift SVN r4061
2013-02-15 22:30:29 +00:00
Doug Gregor
8b22cb0ff8 Don't reference ClangModule in the general ModuleLoader
Swift SVN r3261
2012-11-27 21:10:09 +00:00
Doug Gregor
bb26f52585 Initial support for loading Clang modules into Swift.
From a user's perspective, one imports Clang modules using the normal
Swift syntax for module imports, e.g.,

  import Cocoa

However, to enable importing Clang modules, one needs to point Swift
at a particular SDK with the -sdk= argument, e.g.,

  swift -sdk=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.9M.sdk

and, of course, that SDK needs to provide support for modules.

There are a number of moving parts here. The major pieces are:

CMake support for linking Clang into Swift: CMake users will now need
to set the SWIFT_PATH_TO_CLANG_SOURCE and SWIFT_PATH_TO_CLANG_BUILD
to the locations of the Clang source tree (which defaults to
tools/clang under your LLVM source tree) and the Clang build tree.

Makefile support for linking Clang into Swift: Makefile users will
need to have Clang located in tools/clang and Swift located in
tools/swift, and builds should just work.

Module loader abstraction: similar to Clang's module loader,
a module loader is responsible for resolving a module name to an
actual module, loading that module in the process. It will also be
responsible for performing name lookup into that module.

Clang importer: the only implementation of the module loader
abstraction, the importer creates a Clang compiler instance capable of
building and loading Clang modules. The approach we take here is to
parse a dummy .m file in Objective-C ARC mode with modules enabled,
but never tear down that compilation unit. Then, when we get a request
to import a Clang module, we turn that into a module-load request to
Clang's module loader, which will build an appropriate module
on-the-fly or used a cached module file.

Note that name lookup into Clang modules is not yet
implemented. That's the next major step.



Swift SVN r3199
2012-11-16 18:17:05 +00:00