Otherwise, referring to swift_ASTGen_bridgedSwiftClosureCall_1 results in
a linker error on a bootstrap build (i.e., without Swift host tools
available).
* Instead of hoisting VarDecl in the bridging functions, do it in
ASTGen.
* Introduce `Decl::forEachDeclToHoist` to handle VarDecls in
PatternBindingDecl, and EnumElementDecl in EnumCaseDecl.
* Intorduce `withBridgedSwiftClosure(closure:call:)` as a callback
mechanism between Swift and C++
* In `generate(sourceFile:)`, instead of using `generate(codeBlockItem:)`
handle `CodeBlockItemSyntax.Item` manually to handle `TLCD` wrapping
and `VarDecl` hoisting.
* Make `generate(variableDecl:)` handle TLCD correctly.
* Move `AvailabilitySpec` handling logic to AST, so they can be shared
between libParse and ASTGen
* Requestify '-define-availability' arguments parsing and parse them
with 'SwiftParser' according to the 'ParserASTGen' feature flag
* Implement 'AvailableAttr' generation in ASTGen
Add the necessary compiler-side logic to allow
the regex parsing library to hand back a set of
features for a regex literal, which can then be
diagnosed by ExprAvailabilityWalker if the
availability context isn't sufficient. No tests
as this only adds the necessary infrastructure,
we don't yet hand back the features from the regex
parsing library.
Remove the default constructor footgun present with
the struct implementations, and sprinkle some
`SWIFT_NAME` and bridging utilities to make them
nicer to work with.
