'ParserUnit' is used for analyzing syntax structures _mainly_ in
SourceKit.
Since we removed IfConfigDecl from AST, ParserUnit didn't
inclue any AST in #if ... #endif regions even for active region because
it used to consider all inactive. Instead, consider every region
"active" and include all the AST nodes.
rdar://117387631
Specifically:
1. Fix the error message so that when we say you can't have a deinit that a
deinit can be on a noncopyable type along side a class or an actor.
2. Even though we already error on @objc enums and say they cannot be
noncopyable, we did not emit an error on the deinit saying that @objc enums
cannot have a deinit. I put in a nice to have error just to make it even
clearer.
rdar://105855978
rdar://106566054
Arguments in `SubscriptExpr` are visited since the recent `ArgumentList`
refactoring, but were being added to the containing `CallExpr`. Add a
node for the `SubscriptExpr` itself so that its argument is added there
instead of the `CallExpr`.
Also remove `key.nameoffset` and `key.namelength` from the response when
both are 0 to match the rest of the offsets and lengths.
Resolves rdar://85412164.
We used to compute the mangled name in other cases, but document structure is
a syntactic request and can't guarantee that the class/protocol we're getting
the mangled name of is valid in any way so it often breaks assumptions in the
mangler and causes it to crash. It's not clear if the runtime_name is actually
being used anymore, so this change restricts reporting it to just the cases
where we don't need to mangle.
rdar://problem/40956377
It looks like we recently started binding extensions to their nominals in order
to continue to compute access levels via ValueDecl::getFormalAccess() after an
assertion was added to enforce that bindExtensions had been called before
anything tried to call ExtensionDecl::getBoundNominal() - which
getFormalAccess() depends on. Sourcekitd's syntactic requests are made on every
keypress in the editor though, so we shouldn't do any name binding (which may
require module loading) to keep them as fast as possible.
This patch restores the old inferAccessLevel() functions we used prior to the
switch to ValueDecl::getFormalAccess() (plus a few fixes) that does as much as
it can syntactically, without any name binding, and simply doesn't report the
access level in cases where it couldn't be computed without name-binding.
This also fixes an assertion hit we were getting trying to bind extensions in
inactive ifconfig clauses, which ASTScope doesn't support.
Resolves rdar://problem/57202584
It was being used purely to get the name of the type context for a diagnostic
message. SourceKit's syntactic-only requests were hitting an assertion when
this diagnostic was triggered because they don't set up a type checker.
Accessors logically belong to their storage and can be synthesized
on the fly, so removing them from the members list eliminates one
source of mutability (but doesn't eliminate it; there are also
witnesses for derived conformances, and implicit constructors).
Since a few ASTWalker implementations break in non-trivial ways when
the traversal is changed to visit accessors as children of the storage
rather than peers, I hacked up the ASTWalker to optionally preserve
the old traversal order for now. This is ugly and needs to be cleaned up,
but I want to avoid breaking _too_ much with this commit.
ModelASTWalker was previously constructing SyntaxNodes for EnumElementDecls
manually when visiting their associated EnumCaseDecl so that they would appear
as children rather than siblings. It wasn't actually walking these nodes
though, so missed handling some things, e.g. closures passed as default
argument values. These were also still being visited later, and because the
first visit consumed all the associated TokenNodes, this was triggering an
assertion due to the associated TokenNodes not matching expectations.
- When parsing a type or extension declaration, attempt to parse a function or property declaration when meeting an identifier, an operator or a paren (for tuple declarations).
- Produce the diagnostic with a fix-it suggesting to insert the needed keyword
- Recover parsing as if the declaration with the missing keyword is a function/property declaration
Resolves https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-10477
