15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Daniel Rodríguez Troitiño
e60785e1ef [test] Mark some tests as requiring Swift Syntax (#70493)
Some of the tests now depend on features provided by Swift Syntax, and
will fail to pass if building without Swift Syntax support.

This commits marks all the tests I know fail to pass when Swift Syntax
is disabled.

- #70281 modified `ASTGen/verify-parse.swift`
- #70287 created `refactoring/SyntacticRename/operator.swift` and `SourceKit/RelatedIdents/operator.swift`
- #70389 modified `SourceKit/Refactoring/basic.swift` and indirectly
  modified all `refactoring/ExtractFunction/*` tests.
2023-12-15 13:33:14 -08:00
Alex Hoppen
32e366a98a [SourceKit] Migrate renameAvailabilityInfo to use the SwiftSyntax NameMatcher
The `NameMatcher` implemented in swift-syntax as slightly different semantics because it consideres `(callable.|callAsFunction)(x: 78)` as a reference to `callAsFunction` instead of a call with argument labels `(x: 78)`, which means that one test needs to be updated.
2023-12-12 12:49:16 -08:00
Alex Hoppen
eb6729754d [IDE] Report ambiguous cursor info results 2023-03-20 08:09:10 -07:00
Ben Barham
c7620fa979 [Refactorings] Add cursor refactorings for the start of the range
When a range is a single expression/statement/decl or part of
expression, also return cursor based refactorings for the start of the
range.

This is a stop gap until the available refactorings are properly fixed
to be more lenient in general - the current fix is a little odd as eg.
if all of `foo.bar()` is selected, rename will be returned as an
available refactoring for `foo`. Still an improvement over completely
missing cursor based refactorings, however.

Resolves rdar://82060063
2021-08-18 14:04:10 +10:00
Ben Barham
fabb02100f [Test] Add @escaping to async refactoring tests
The async refactorings ignore whether a completion handler had
`@escaping` or not. In preparation of fixing this, fix up all functions
to have `@escaping` for their completion handler parameter.

Also some small miscellaneous fixes in order to reduce the number of
warnings output on test failures and also the addition of `REQUIRES:
concurrency` on all tests.
2021-07-24 09:53:17 +10:00
Alex Hoppen
80bfcf5dad [sourcekitd-test] Support refactoring based on a byte offset location
If an offset position but no line/column combination is given to `sourcekitd-test` when requesting a refactoring action, compute the line/column from the offset.
2021-06-10 16:54:04 +02:00
Hamish Knight
10038b6fce [Refactoring] Add async wrapper refactoring action
This allows an async alternative function to be
created that forwards onto the user's completion
handler function through the use of
`withCheckedContinuation`/`withCheckedThrowingContinuation`.

rdar://77802486
2021-05-19 20:46:02 +01:00
Hamish Knight
8c5c1ae8a5 [test] Fix a couple of incorrect FileCheck directives 2021-05-19 20:46:00 +01:00
Doug Gregor
238290cdc4 [SE-0296] Enable async/await by default.
Always parse `async` and `await`, allowing the definition and use of
asynchronous functions without the "experimental concurrency" flag.

Note that, at present, use of asynchronous functions requires one to
explicitly import or link against the `_Concurrency` library. We'll
sort this out in a follow-up change.

Tracked by rdar://73455330.
2021-02-05 09:51:46 -08:00
Ben Barham
a9073b0922 [Refactoring] Add async refactorings
Adds three refactorings intended to help users migrate their existing
code to use the new async language features:
  1. Convert call to use async alternative
  2. Convert function to async
  3. Add async alternative function

A function is considered to have an async alternative if it has a void
return type and has a void returning closure as its last parameter. A
method to explicitly mark functions as having an async alternative may
be added to make this more accurate in the future (required for eg.
a warning about a call to the non-async version of a function in an
async context).

(1) converts a call to use the new `await` async language syntax. If the
async alternative throws, it will also add `try`. The closure itself is
hoisted out of the call, see the comments on
`AsyncConversionStringBuilder` for specifics.

(2) converts a whole function to `async`, using (1) to convert any calls
in the function to their async alternatives. (3) is similar to (2), but
instead *adds* a function and replaces calls to its
completion/handler/callback closure parameter with `return` or `throws`.

Resolves rdar://68254700
2021-02-03 15:54:46 +10:00
Nathan Hawes
0f8619b943 [IDE][SourceKit] Support escaped identifiers for the syntactic rename and related idents requests.
Resolves rdar://problem/46409010
Resolves rdar://problem/48256383
2020-04-30 13:08:23 -07:00
Nathan Hawes
7c0a17803d [Sema] Maintain the implicitness of call argument tuple/parens in coerceCallArguments
If any arguments were defaulted the tuple/paren was made implicit, even though
the original tuple/paren was present in the source.

This prevented some sourcekit ASTWalkers from considering them, making
refactorings, documentation info, jump-to-definition and other features
unavailable when queried via their argument labels.

Resolves rdar://problem/62118957
2020-04-23 18:54:46 -07:00
Nathan Hawes
bce68fa4e5 [IDE][Refactoring] Handle 'callAsFunction' specially in syntactic rename.
This change makes us treat it exactly as we do 'init'. We don't allow renaming the base name,
and don't fail if the basename doesn't match for calls.

Also:
  - explicit init calls/references like `MyType.init(42)` are now reported with
    'init' as a keywordBase range, rather than nothing.
  - cursor info no longer reports rename as available on init/callAsFunction
    calls without arguments, as there's nothing to rename in that case.
  - Improved detection of when a referenced function is a call (rather than
    reference) across syntactic rename, cursor-info, and indexing.

Resolves rdar://problem/60340429
2020-04-12 17:14:15 -07:00
Rintaro Ishizaki
0aa3125b62 [Testing] Eliminate REQUIRES-ANY usage
REQUIRES-ANY is deprecated and being removed. Use boolean expressions.

rdar://problem/58549266
2020-01-14 10:21:49 -08:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis
60a91bb736 [refactoring] Upstreaming the implementation for Swift local refactoring (#11568)
[refactoring] Upstreaming the implementation for Swift local refactoring
2017-08-22 16:50:16 -07:00