This was part of the original weak design that
there was never any particular reason to rush the
implementation for. It's convenient to do this now
so that we can use it to implement Unmanaged<T> for
importing CF types.
Swift SVN r16693
We have to work with selectors quite often, so provide an efficient
representation for them. Switch ObjCAttr over to this representation,
which has the nice property that it efficiently represents implicit
@objc attributes with names and allows us to overwrite the Objective-C
name without losing all source information. Addresses
<rdar://problem/16478678>, and sets us up for dealing with selectors
better.
Swift SVN r16327
... and fix a few other bugs:
* always set the inherited protocols on the ProtocolDecl in the type checker,
so that we can remove a hack in ProtocolDecl::requiresClassSlow();
* diagnose DeclAttributes that are inverted when this is not allowed.
Swift SVN r15992
To generalize our serialization logic for more attributes, serialize
each DeclAttribute object in a separate bitcode record.
For simple declaration attributes (no arguments), all of this
serialization logic can be fully automatically generated, and is
done so in this patch. This currently includes @final, but will
expand over time.
To illustrate the plumbing end-to-end, move the serialization logic
for asmnmame over to the new mechanism.
Swift SVN r15933
The new "final" attribute didn't have a DeclAttribute subclass. While
that sounds like a nice simplification, it makes visitors awkward to
use.
Swift SVN r15899
This is missing almost all semantic analysis and is missing various
optimization opportunities (e.g. final methods that are not overrides
don't need vtable entries), but this is enough to devirtualize class
stuff, which is important for our performance efforts. I'll add this
to release notes when it is more fully fleshed out.
Swift SVN r15885
With this in place, remove the hacks that peeked at the imported Clang
node to determine the selector for a method. We're all
attribute-driven now. Part of <rdar://problem/16019773>.
Swift SVN r15663
Protocols can declare methods as being unavailable, as they do
in NSObjectProtocol (e.g., 'retain'). We both need to flag these
uses, but understand this for protocol conformance. For protocol
conformance, treat unavailable methods as if they were marked
optional. The compiler will not allow you to use these methods
anyway.
This finishes up support for:
<rdar://problem/16331335> Ban ObjC ARC entry points
Swift SVN r15644
This is a direct translation which happens when a Clang declaration
gets translated to a Swift declaration. This changed, coupled
with the current @availability checking (which is still limited)
now prohibits cases such as using 'NSDeallocateObject()' or
'- (BOOL) allowsWeakReference' from Swift.
Interestingly, it doesn't catch uses of -retain/-release yet, because
those methods are marked unavailable in the NSObject *protocol*.
While the attributes are being mapped over, the @availability
checking needs to be enhanced to replicate more of what Clang does
for this case.
Swift SVN r15643
The @objc attribute can now be provided with a name (in parentheses),
which names the corresponding entity in Objective-C. The name will
either be a selector (for anything that maps down to an Objective-C
method) or a single identifier (for classes and protocols).
The extra information is not used for anything yet.
Swift SVN r15626
For example:
@class_protocol, @objc
is now just:
@class_protocol @objc
Once we removed attribute grouping in brackets this comma separation
became vestigial. Doug and I discussed this and thought this
was a good simplification in the grammar.
This change still remains to be done for type attributes.
Swift SVN r15540
The parsing here for @availability isn't real yet; but it provides
scaffolding. Intended grammar:
@availability(*, unavailable, message="...")
@availability(*, unavailable)
@availability(ios, unavailable)
and so on.
Much of this doesn't work yet in a general way, but I wanted something
basic to work with to start with to wire up the functionality
for @availability end-to-end (at least for 'unavailable').
As part of this, extend DECL_ATTR to include whether or not an
attribute supports multiple declarations, and use this for
@availability.
Also hardwire darwin platforms, which we will need to have this
list come from somewhere. The checking could be done at parsing
or elsewhere.
Swift SVN r15491
Via preprocessor goop, Serialization.cpp generates a set of static
functions that can be used to verify if a set of attributes
can be serialized for a particular declaration.
This design forces the author of the attribute to specify up front
whether or not an attribute is supported on a given declaration
kind. We can possibly hoist this into semantic analysis as well.
These N separate functions do conceptually replace a simple
variadic template implementation. I'm fine with alternatives,
but the goal was to provide a way for the author of new
attributes to describe the requirements in one place: Attr.def.
Swift SVN r15470
This representation is inspired by Clang's internal representation.
The current attribute representation, which is basically a union
of "stuff" in DeclAttributes, is not amendable to richer
attributes, such as @availability, that need to be implemented.
In Clang, attributes are modeled with actual objects that
encode both semantic and syntactic information (e.g., source ranges)
that facilitate richer checking, better diagnostics, and better tools.
This change is foundational for implementing @availability, but
also is a better long-term representation. As a migratory path,
it creates some duplications, with AttrKind and DeclAttrKind, the
two which should eventually become the same thing.
As part of this patch, there is some additional parser recovery
(for the new attribute representation) for duplicate attributes.
The parser now parses the entire duplicate attribute, which could
be quite complex, and then issues a diagnostic that the attribute
is a duplicate (and discarding it). This delayed diagnostic
also allows us to present ranges for the duplicate attribute, which
provides a better user experience.
Swift SVN r15365
The 'override' attribute indicates that the given declaration, which
may be a method, property, or subscript, overrides a declaration in
its superclass. Per today's discussion, the 'override' attribute must
be present if and only if the corresponding declaration overrides a
declaration in its superclass.
This implements most of <rdar://problem/14798539>. There's still more
work to do to on property and subscript overrides.
Swift SVN r14388
We can attach comments to declarations. Right now we only support comments
that precede the declarations (trailing comments will be supported later).
The implementation approach is different from one we have in Clang. In Swift
the Lexer attaches the comments to the next token, and parser checks if
comments are present on the first token of the declaration. This is much
cleaner, and faster than Clang's approach (where we perform a binary search on
source locations and do ad-hoc fixups afterwards).
The comment <-> decl correspondence is modeled as "virtual" attributes that can
not be spelled in the source. These attributes are not serialized at the
moment -- this will be implemented later.
Swift SVN r14031
"@mutating func f()". I'm keeping the @mutating version around
so we can determine what to do with @!mutating.
Also, improve the QoI of mutating related diagnostics.
Swift SVN r13480
This attribute states that all stored properties within the class must
provide initial values. This will allow us to move stored property
initialization into Objective-C's post-allocation initialization hook,
.cxx_construct.
Swift SVN r12228
AttributeId: Any occurence of '@<attribute-name>' anywhere.
AttributeBuiltin: A "resolved/active" attribute. Mis-applied attributes will be AttributeId.
This provides more options for coloring attributes in a way that one can easily spot
attributes that are not applied correctly.
Swift SVN r12194
