Add a note explaining that dependence on closure captures is not
supported. Otherwise, the diagnostics are very confusing:
"it depends on a closure capture; this is not yet supported"
Ensure that we always issue a diagnostic on error, but avoid emitting any notes that don't have source locations.
With implicit accessors and thunks, report the correct line number and indicate which accessor generates the error.
Always check for debug_value users.
Consistently handle access scopes across diagnostic analysis and diagnostic messages.
1. move embedded diagnostics out of the PerformanceDiagnostics pass. It was completely separated from the other logic in this pass, anyway.
2. rewrite it in swift
3. fix several bugs, that means: missed diagnostics, which led to IRGen crashes
* look at all methods in witness tables, including base protocols and associated conformances
* visit all functions in the call tree, including generic functions with class bound generic arguments
* handle all instructions, e.g. concurrency builtins
4. improve error messages by adding meaningful call-site information. For example:
* if the error is in a specialized function, report where the generic function is originally specialized with concrete types
* if the error is in a protocol witness method, report where the existential is created
We decided that using a magic typealias to set the executor factory was better
than using a compiler option. Remove the `-executor-factory` option, and replace
by looking up the `DefaultExecutorFactory` type, first in the main module, and
then if that fails in Concurrency.
rdar://149058236
We've been converging the implementations of educational notes and
diagnostic groups, where both provide category information in
diagnostics (e.g., `[#StrictMemorySafety]`) and corresponding
short-form documentation files. The diagnostic group model is more
useful in a few ways:
* It provides warnings-as-errors control for warnings in the group
* It is easier to associate a diagnostic with a group with
GROUPED_ERROR/GROUPED_WARNING than it is to have a separate diagnostic
ID -> mapping.
* It is easier to see our progress on diagnostic-group coverage
* It provides an easy name to use for diagnostic purposes.
Collapse the educational-notes infrastructure into diagnostic groups,
migrating all of the existing educational notes into new groups.
Simplify the code paths that dealt with multiple educational notes to
have a single, possibly-missing "category documentation URL", which is
how we're treating this.
Tweaked diagnostic to use a string instead of a type. Renamed the
feature in `FeatureAvailability.def` (and added the `TaskExecutor`
feature to 6.2). Also fixed the `swift_getActiveExecutor()`
function to return the main executor only when on the main thread.
rdar://141348916
Added an `-executor-factory` argument to the compiler to let you safely
specify the executors you wish to use (by naming a type that returns
them).
Also added some tests of the new functionality.
rdar://141348916
The reason why I am doing this is that in certain cases the AST captures indices
will never actually line up with partial apply capture indices since we seem to
"smush" together closures and locally defined functions.
NOTE: The reason for the really small amount of test changes is that this change
does not change the actual output by design. The only cases I had to change were
a case where we began to emit a better diagnostic and also where I added code
coverage around _ and let _ since those require ignored_use to be implemented so
that they would be diagnosed (previously we just did not emit anything so we
couldn't emit the diagnostic at the SIL level).
rdar://142661388
In terms of the test suite the only difference is that we allow for non-Sendable
types to be returned from nonisolated functions. This is safe due to the rules
of rbi. We do still error when we return non-Sendable functions across isolation
boundaries though.
The reason that I am doing this now is that I am implementing a prototype that
allows for nonisolated functions to inherit isolation from their caller. This
would have required me to implement support both in Sema for results and
arguments in SIL. Rather than implement results in Sema, I just finished the
work of transitioning the result checking out of Sema and into SIL. The actual
prototype will land in a subsequent change.
rdar://127477211
The reason that I am modifying this error is that in situations like the
following one can have a Sendable type that triggers this error since the box
containing the value is non-Sendable.
```
func methodConsuming(x: consuming SendableKlass) async throws {
try await withThrowingTaskGroup(of: Void.self) { group in
group.addTask { // expected-tns-warning {{passing closure as a 'sending' parameter risks causing data races between code in the current task and concurrent execution of the closure}}
useValue(x) // expected-tns-note {{closure captures reference to mutable var 'x' which is accessible to code in the current task}}
}
try await group.waitForAll()
}
}
```
rdar://133813644
(cherry picked from commit 36c2b3cc1330c07dcf9715f8ae88d31f9dba58c4)
This requires two major changes.
The first is that we need to teach SILGen that the isolation of an initializer
is essentially dynamic (as far as SILGen is concerned) --- that it needs to emit
code in order to get the isolation reference. To make this work, I needed to
refactor how we store the expected executor of a function so that it's not
always a constant value; instead, we'll need to emit code that DI will lower
properly. Fortunately, I can largely build on top of the work that Doug previously
did to support #isolation in these functions. The SIL we emit here around delegating
initializer calls is not ideal --- the breadcrumb hop ends up jumping to the
generic executor, and then DI actually emits the hop to the actor. This is a little
silly, but it's hard to eliminate without special-casing the self-rebinding, which
honestly we should consider rather than the weirdly global handling of that in
SILGen today. The optimizer should eliminate this hop pretty reliably, at least.
The second is that we need to teach DI to handle the pattern of code we get in
delegating initializers, where the builtin actually has to be passed the self var
rather than a class reference. This is because we don't *have* a class reference
that's consistently correct in these cases. This ended up being a fairly
straightforward generalization.
I also taught the hop_to_executor optimizer to skip over the initialization of
the default-actor header; there are a lot of simple cases where we still do emit
the prologue generic-executor hop, but at least the most trivial case is handled.
To do this better, we'd need to teach this bit of the optimizer that the properties
of self can be stored to in an initializer prior to the object having escaped, and
we don't have that information easily at hand, I think.
Fixes rdar://87485045.
Specifically:
I changed the main error message to focus on the closure and that the closure
is being accessed concurrently.
If we find that we captured a value that is the actual isolation source, we
emit that the capture is actually actor isolated.
If the captured value is in the same region as the isolated value but is not
isolated, we instead say that the value is accessible from *-isolated code or
code within the current task.
If we find multiple captures and we do not which is the actual value that was
in the same region before we formed the partial apply, we just emit a note on
the captures saying that the closure captures the value.
I changed the diagnostics from using the phrase "task-isolated" to use some
variant of accessible to code in the current task.
The idea is that in all situations we provide a breadcrumb that the user can
start investigating rather than just saying that the closure is "task-isolated".
From a preconcurrency perspective, I made it so that we apply the preconcurrency
behavior of all of the captures. This means that if one of the captures is
preconcurrency, we apply the preconcurrency restriction to the closure. This is
one step towards making it so that preconcurrency applies at the region level...
we just are not completely there yet.
rdar://133798044
The changes to allow for partial consumption unintentionally also allowed for
`self` to be consumed as a whole during `deinit`, which we don't yet want to
allow because it could lead to accidental "resurrection" and/or accidental
infinite recursion if the consuming method lets `deinit` be implicitly run
again. This makes it an error again. The experimental feature
`ConsumeSelfInDeinit` will allow it for test coverage or experimentation
purposes. rdar://132761460
Otherwise, we will assume that an async let autoclosure infers isolation from
its DeclContext... which we do not want. An async let autoclosure should always
be nonisolated + sending.
The diagnostic change that I mentioned in the header is that we were emitting
unfortunate "sending task or actor isolated could result in races" error. I
eliminated this by adding a new diagnostic for transfer non transferrable errors
happening in autoclosures. So now we emit this:
```swift
func asyncLetInferAsNonIsolated<T : Actor>(
isolation actor: isolated T
) async throws {
async let subTask: Void = {
await useValueAsyncNoReturnWithInstance(self, actor)
// expected-warning @-1:47 {{sending 'self' risks causing data races}}
// expected-note @-2 {{sending 'actor'-isolated 'self' into async let risks causing data races between nonisolated and 'actor'-isolated uses}}
}()
await subTask
```
I also noticed that we did not have enough test cases for autoclosures in
general so I also added a bunch of tests just so we can see what the current
behavior is. I think there are a few issues therein (I believe some may have
been reported due to '??').
rdar://130151318
Otherwise IRGen would crash.
It needs a bit of work to support alloc_box of generic non-copyable structs/enums with deinit, because we need to specialize the deinit functions, though they are not explicitly referenced in SIL.
Until this is supported, give an error in such cases.
Fixes a compiler crash in IRGen
rdar://130283111
Replace the assert-check if a vtable is available with a regular error message.
This cannot occur in regular builds - only if built with embedded swift and without wmo.
The command line compiler prevents this combination, but it can happen in SourceKit.
rdar://130167087
Specifically:
1. We error now if one transfers an 'inout sending' parameter and does not
reinitialize it before the end of the function.
2. We error now if one merges an 'inout sending' parameter into an actor
isolated region and do not reinitialize it with a non-actor isolated value
before the end of the function.
rdar://126303739
This isn't fully implemented yet so it would crash eventually, so instead of
letting the compiler crash put up a proper diagnostic indicating this isn't
yet implemented. rdar://129034189
