Use IncludeTreeFileList instead of full feature CASFS for swift
dependency filesystem. This allows smaller CAS based VFS that is smaller
and faster. This is enabled by the CAS enabled compilation does not
need to iterate file system.
rdar://136787368
We should still try adding the overlays, even if we're asked not to
generate a diagnostic while doing so. That's slightly safer because
it means that we're less likely to find ourselves in a situation
where `swift-modulewrap` wants to use types from the C/C++ library
and can't.
rdar://115918181
For now, this logic is used for importing fewer unannotated types as
unsafe. In the future, this logic will be used by escapability inference
for other (non-aggregate) types.
`swift-modulewrap` uses the `ClangImporter` to obtain a module loader,
but it doesn't take an SDK argument (nor does anything bother to pass
one), which means that when cross-compiling you get warnings about not
being able to find the C library.
Suppress the warning by telling the `ClangImporter` that we don't care
about the C library here.
rdar://115918181
This makes sure that Swift respects `-Xcc -stdlib=libc++` flags.
Clang already has existing logic to discover the system-wide libc++ installation on Linux. We rely on that logic here.
Importing a Swift module that was built with a different C++ stdlib is not supported and emits an error.
The Cxx module can be imported when compiling with any C++ stdlib. The synthesized conformances, e.g. to CxxRandomAccessCollection also work. However, CxxStdlib currently cannot be imported when compiling with libc++, since on Linux it refers to symbols from libstdc++ which have different mangled names in libc++.
rdar://118357548 / https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/69825
The decision to exclude `-Xcc -D` options from swift module hash
actually doesn't help to solve the problem. It wouldn't reduce the
module variants (or the number of swiftmodule build commands) because
the command-line also encodes all the clang PCM dependencies that do get
affected by `-Xcc` flags.
To avoid the false sharing and the nondeterministic build products,
include most of the `-Xcc` flags, except include search path, into swift
module hash.
rdar://132046247
When the swiftmodule is built with different clang importer arguments,
they can have the same module hash, causing them to be wrongly re-used even
they contains different interfaces. Add ReducedExtraArgs to the module hash to
disambiguate them.
However, some Xcc arguments, most commonly `-D` options do not affect the
swiftmodule being generated. Do not pass `-Xcc -DARGS` to swift
interface compilation to reduce the amount of module variants in the
build.
rdar://131408266
These x-refs might not be resolvable using regular lookup from the 'std' module as they could be instantiated/synthesized
by the clang importer. Augment the lookup logic in that case to try clang importer lookup logic that is used during
the conformance to the C++ iterator protocol.
Fix the problem that when the only module can be found is an
invalid/out-of-date swift binary module, canImport and import statement
can have different view for if the module can be imported or not.
Now canImport will evaluate to false if the only module can be found for
name is an invalid swiftmodule, with a warning with the path to the
module so users will not be surprised by such behavior.
rdar://128876895
The clang nodes associated with Swift's Core Foundation types can already be
represented by a pointer. The interop code does not need to add an extra
layer of indirection in those cases.
rdar://119840281
Make sure the `-Xcc` options to the scanner are correctly considered
when creating ClangImporterCC1 arguments for constructed swift interface
compilation job. Under directcc1 mode, `-Xcc` options should be used to
constructed sub-invocation but should not be added to GenericArgs for
constructing interface compilation jobs.
rdar://128873665
Several offsetting bugs both broke the caching of `ObjCInterfaceAndImplementationRequest` and caused it to usually miss. Fix this whole painful mess. Also has collateral improvements to simple_display().
CountAttributedType and TypeCoupledDeclRefInfo are new Clang type
and type metadata created for types with the 'counted_by' attribute
that shouldn't be accessible from Swift right now. Hence, marking
them unreachable.
Conflicts:
lib/Basic/Platform.cpp
```
diff --git a/lib/Basic/Platform.cpp b/lib/Basic/Platform.cpp
index 240edfa144a..1797c87635f 100644
--- a/lib/Basic/Platform.cpp
+++ b/lib/Basic/Platform.cpp
@@ -200,10 +200,7 @@ StringRef swift::getPlatformNameForTriple(const llvm::Triple &triple) {
case llvm::Triple::CUDA:
case llvm::Triple::DragonFly:
case llvm::Triple::DriverKit:
-<<<<<<< HEAD
case llvm::Triple::ELFIAMCU:
-=======
->>>>>>> main
case llvm::Triple::Emscripten:
case llvm::Triple::Fuchsia:
case llvm::Triple::HermitCore:
```
When caching is enabled with include-tree, the bridging header PCH is
created from the include tree directly. Setup the rewriter correctly
when embedding the bridging header into swift binary module.
rdar://125719747
When caching build is enabled, teach dependency scanner to report
command-lines with `-direct-clang-cc1-module-build` so the later
compilation can instantiate clang importer with cc1 args directly. This
avoids running clang driver code, which might involve file system
lookups, which are the file deps that are not captured and might result
in different compilation mode.
rdar://119275464
Otherwise they may have module dependencies of their own which will not be detected by the scanner and included in the list of explicit inputs for compilation.