Adds a new frontend option
"-experimental-allow-module-with-compiler-errors". If any compilation
errors occur while generating the .swiftmodule, this mode will skip SIL
entirely and only serialize the (likey invalid) AST.
This existence of this option during generation is serialized into the
resulting .swiftmodule. Errors found in deserialization are only allowed
if it is set.
Primarily intended for IDE requests (eg. indexing and code completion)
to ensure robust cross-module results, despite possible errors.
Resolves rdar://69815975
Adds a new flag "-experimental-skip-all-function-bodies" that skips
typechecking and SIL generation for all function bodies (where
possible).
`didSet` functions are still typechecked and have SIL generated as their
body is checked for the `oldValue` parameter, but are not serialized.
Parsing will generally be skipped as well, but this isn't necessarily
the case since other flags (eg. "-verify-syntax-tree") may force delayed
parsing off.
If a conformance is defined in an extension, we now look for
references to the conformance in types and expressions and
respect's the extension's availability (or deprecation, etc).
The conformance checker itself still needs to check conformance
availability of associated conformances and the like; that will
be a separate change.
Note that conformances defined on types don't require any
special handling, since they are as available as the
intersection of the conforming type and the protocol.
By default, we diagnose conformance availability violations
where the OS version is not sufficiently new as warnings, to
avoid breaking source compatibility. Stricter behavior where
these violations are diagnosed as errors is enabled by passing
the -enable-conformance-availability-errors flag. There are
test cases that run both with and without this flag. In the
future, we hope to make the stricter behavior the default,
since after all, violations here can result in link errors and
runtime crashes.
Uses of completely unavailable conformances are still always
diagnosed as errors, even when this flag is not passed in.
Progress on <rdar://problem/35158274>.
With this option enabled, the dependency scanner gathers all import statements in source files of the main module (non-transitive) and outputs a list of imported modules.
This will be used by build systems and the swift-driver as a way to avoid redundant re-scanning in incremental contexts.
Specifically the option: -sil-stop-optzns-before-lowering-ownership. This makes
it possible to write end-to-end tests on OSSA passes. Before one would have to
pattern match after ownership was lowered, losing the ability to do finegrained
FileCheck pattern matching on ossa itself.
This scanning mode allows swift-driver to query module dependencies in a batch
and in a more granular way. In short term, it could help solve a problem that
clang module dependencies may vary if target triple changes. In a longer term,
we could break a holistic dependencies graph into smaller pieces for better caching
and reusing.
This change doesn't include the implementation of using the specified scanner
arguments to set up Clang dependencies scanner. It will come in later commits.
Add a debugging mechanism that enables the JIT to dump the LLVM IR and
object files to enable debugging the JIT. This makes it easier to debug
the JIT mode failures. The idea was from Lang Hames!
- deduplicate the logic to compute the resource folder
- install headers and module files in shared and static resource folders
- forward -static flag when calling swiftc with -print-target-info
Print implementation-only imports in the private textual interface
only if also importing SPI. This allows to export types from
implementation-only imports in SPI and brings the private textual
interfaces in line with the binary interfaces.
This is a temporary solution as we need to better design the language
feature around this.
This feature requires passing -experimental-spi-imports to the frontend
that generates the private swiftinterface file.
Add `async` to the type system. `async` can be written as part of a
function type or function declaration, following the parameter list, e.g.,
func doSomeWork() async { ... }
`async` functions are distinct from non-`async` functions and there
are no conversions amongst them. At present, `async` functions do not
*do* anything, but this commit fully supports them as a distinct kind
of function throughout:
* Parsing of `async`
* AST representation of `async` in declarations and types
* Syntactic type representation of `async`
* (De-/re-)mangling of function types involving 'async'
* Runtime type representation and reconstruction of function types
involving `async`.
* Dynamic casting restrictions for `async` function types
* (De-)serialization of `async` function types
* Disabling overriding, witness matching, and conversions with
differing `async`
Introduce a new frontend flag -enable-volatile-modules to trigger
loading swiftmodule files as volatile and avoid using mmap. Revert the
default behavior to using mmap.
-compile-module-from-interface action now takes arguments of -candidate-module-file.
If one of the candidate module files is up-to-date, the action emits a forwarding
module pointing to the candidate module instead of building a binary module.
This flag no longer does anything now that the unified statistics
reporting infrastructure exists. It is better to use
-driver-time-compilation to see a bird's eye view of timing statistics
for frontend jobs, and -stats-output-dir to see a down-and-dirty view of
everything including performance counters.
Instead of taking paths of Swift module files from front-end command line
arguments, we should take a JSON file specifying details of explicit modules.
The advantages is (1) .swiftdoc and .swiftsourceinfo can be associated
with a .swiftmodule file, and (2) module names are explicitly used as
keys in the JSON input so we don't need to eagerly deserialize a .swiftmodule
file to collect the module name.
Introduce an experimental mode (behind the flag
`experimental-one-way-closure-params`) that places one-way
constraints between closure parameter types and references to those
parameters within the body of the closure. The intent here is to
break up constraint systems further, potentially improving type
checking performance and making way for larger closure bodies to be
supported.
This is a source-breaking change when the body of a single-expression
closure is used to determine the parameter types. One obvious example
is when there is no contextual type, e.g.,
let _ = { $0 + 1 }
this type-checks today because `1` becomes `Int`, which matches the
`+` overload with the type `(Int, Int) -> Int`, determining the
parameter type `Int` for the closure. Such code would not type-check
with one-way constraints.
This default formatting style remains the same "LLVM style". "Swift style"
is what was previously enabled via -enable-experimental-diagnostic-formatting
