`enum` is a signed integer type on some platforms. The return value of
`std::numeric_limits<T>::max()` is a `size_t` which is unsigned. Further
manipulation retains the unsigned-ness until the assignment which
results in truncation. Change the type to a `constexpr` constant
definition and remove the `enum` type along with a type conversion to an
explicitly unsigned integral type.
Complete scopes of scoped addresses (introduced by `store_borrow` and
`begin_access`) in dead end blocks via
`ScopedAddressValue::computeTransitiveLiveness`.
rdar://141037060
Change an assert to a bail-out condition.
I found that it _can_ happen to have a function without a debug scope.
In such a case even printing the SIL crashed.
Be a bit more tolerant.
A begin_apply token may be used by operands that do not end the coroutine:
mark_dependence.
We need an API that gives us only the coroutine-ending uses. This blocks
~Escapable accessors.
end_borrow is considered coroutine-ending even though it does not actually
terminate the coroutine.
We cannot simply ask isLifetimeEnding, because end_apply and abort_apply do not
end any lifetime.
In case the control flow ends in a dead-end block there can be begin-borrow instructions which have no corresponding end-borrow uses.
After duplicating such a block, the re-borrow flags cannot be recomputed correctly for inserted phi arguments.
Therefore just disable duplicating such blocks, e.g. in jump-threading.
This API computes the re-borrow flags for guaranteed phis based on the presence of forwarding instructions in the incoming values.
This is not correct in all cases, because optimizations can optimize away forwarding instructions.
Fixes a verifier crash: rdar://139280579
This ended up in creating a lot of Array functions, even if a program didn't use Array at all.
Now, only add specialization attributes if a function is already there.
Otherwise remember the attributes and add them to a function once it is created.
I am adding this instruction to express artificially that two non-Sendable
values should be part of the same region. It is meant to be used in cases where
due to unsafe code using Sendable, we stop propagating a non-Sendable dependency
that needs to be made in the same region of a use of said Sendable value. I
included an example in ./docs/SIL.rst of where this comes up with @out results
of continuations.
This problem comes up with the following example:
```swift
class A {
var description = ""
}
class B {
let a = A()
func b() {
let asdf = ""
Task { @MainActor in
a.description = asdf // Sending 'asdf' risks causing data races
}
}
}
```
The specific issue is that the closure we generate actually includes an
implicit(any) parameter at the SIL level which occurs after the callee operand
but before the captures. This caused the captured variable index from the AST
and the one we compute from the partial_apply to differ by 1. So we need to
subtract 1 in such a case. That is why we used to print 'asdf' instead of 'a'
above.
DISCUSSION: This shows an interesting difference between SIL applied arg indices
and AST indices. SIL applied arg indices would include the implicit(any)
parameter since it is a parameter in the SIL function type. In contrast, this
doesn't show up in the formal AST parameters or captures. To make it easier to
reason about this, I added a new API to ApplySite called
ApplySite::getASTAppliedArgIndex and added large comments to
getASTAppliedArgIndex and getAppliedArgIndex that explains the issue.
rdar://136593706
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/76648
Collect all types in the substitution map which constitute
type-dependent operands and record them in the instruction's operand
list. Fixes a bug where open_existential_metatype (e.g.) is deleted as
dead because it has no users even when the type it defines is used in a
substitution map of a builtin.
The specific problem here is that this causes MarkUnresolvedMoveAddr to be
within the SINGLE_VALUE_INST_RANGE which defines the classify method used to
determine if casting to a SingleValueInstruction is ok. This is of course not ok
in this case since mark_unresolved_move_addr is actually a NonValueInst.
I noticed this b/c I made the same mistake with a new instruction I am added and
hit a crash in the tests as a result of it being classified as a single value
instruction. After fixing that, I checked for any more instances of this issue
and found that mark_unresolved_move_addr was similarly afflicted.
`Builtin.FixedArray<let N: Int, T: ~Copyable & ~Escapable>` has the layout of `N` elements of type `T` laid out
sequentially in memory (with the tail padding of every element occupied by the array). This provides a primitive
on which the standard library `Vector` type can be built.
When its operand has coroutine kind `yield_once_2`, a `begin_apply`
instruction produces an additional value representing the storage
allocated by the callee. This storage must be deallocated by a
`dealloc_stack` on every path out of the function. Like any other stack
allocation, it must obey stack discipline.
