Have them fill out a vector provided by the caller instead.
It is very easy to have callers just go through the array, thus wasting memory, as
the clang importer ended up doing.
The caller should be the one deciding if the array must be copied in ASTContext or not.
Swift SVN r23472
This functionality doesn’t really change what we accept right now, because we eagerly import all of the methods of a class when we do *any* kind of lookup into the class. However, when we manage to stop doing that, this operation will become more important.
Swift SVN r23289
The ClangDiagnosticConsumer forwards diagnostics from Clang's diagnostic machinery
to Swift's. It deliberately filters out things that happen in our top-level dummy
buffer (usually trivial things like "module imported here"). Unfortunately, it was
doing so by checking against the current SourceManager's "main file". When building
Clang modules (compiling PCM files), we're dealing with a new SourceManager, whose
main file is the module map file.
Instead, just check against the (very unlikely) name of our dummy input file,
like we do for imported headers.
rdar://problem/18867749
Swift SVN r23121
llvm::Optional lives in "llvm/ADT/Optional.h". Like Clang, we can get
Optional in the 'swift' namespace by including "swift/Basic/LLVM.h".
We're now fully switched over to llvm::Optional!
Swift SVN r22477
FixNum.h and BCRecordLayout.h will move down into LLVM, APINotes
will move into Clang. Get the namespaces right before we start to move
files around.
Swift SVN r22218
Removes the initWithBool: hack from the Clang importer. We can now
express NSNumber's conformance to the BooleanLiteralConvertible
protocol in the overlay.
Swift SVN r21976
Conforming to BooleanLiteralConvertible now requires
init(booleanLiteral: Bool)
rather than
static func convertFromBooleanLiteral(value: Bool) -> Self
This posed a problem for NSNumber's conformance to
BooleanLiteralConvertible. A class needs a required initializer to
satisfy an initializer requirement, but one cannot add a required
initializer via an extension. To that end, we hack the Clang importer
to import NSNumber's initWithBool with the name
init(booleanLiteral:)
and add back the expected init(bool:) initializer in the
overlay. These tricks make NSNumber even harder to subclass, but we
don't really care: it's nearly impossible to do well anyway, and is
generally a Bad Idea.
Part of rdar://problem/18154091.
Swift SVN r21961
This re-applies r21857, which was reverted r21871, fixing a use-of-
uninitialized-memory error that only showed up in optimized builds.
Swift SVN r21933
When we print the ObjectiveC module, we really shouldn't see extensions that
come from Foundation. Admittedly, we don't see them correctly in Foundation
either, but that's a separate issue.
There is one slightly unsafe hack here: we still import NSString as String,
by name alone, even when Foundation isn't present. This is because NSString
shows up in the ObjectiveC module, but we want people to be using String
when interacting with NSObject in real life.
Swift SVN r21857
This can be used by SourceKit's interface printer to display modules with
forward declarations of classes in dependent modules, e.g. ObjectiveC
forward-declaring Foundation's NSString for use in NSObject. We can consider
doing something similar for C tag types (structs and enums).
Part of rdar://problem/18273845
Swift SVN r21828
This is a hack that allows us to support accessibility APIs in Swift.
It addresses radar://17509751.
A class might conform to both NSAccessibility (containing accessibility
properties) and individual accessibility protocols (containing
accessibility methods with the same names as the properties). This should
not compile (but currently happens to compile). To avoid the problem down
the road, we import setters and getters instead of the accessibility
properties from NSAccessibility.
Swift SVN r21757
In this mode, use nullability information on the result type of the
initializer or factory method to determine failability of the
initializer. This is behind the flag
-enable-objc-failable-initializers until we have the SILGen support in
place.
Swift SVN r21341
i.e. don't look for attributes on an @class somewhere.
Also do this for tag decls, whose attributes propagate forwards until there's
a definition.
<rdar://problem/17986861>
Swift SVN r21223
This is a step towards making the framework easier to use in Swift; in the
actual headers, these are typed as "CFTypeRef" or "const CFTypeRef", which
is not considered Hashable (and thus cannot be put in a dictionary).
Unfortunately, CFStringRef is also not hashable, so we're not there yet,
but at least this allows a freer conversion to NSString.
Part of <rdar://problem/17162475>
Swift SVN r20931
Previously, we were just storing setter accessibility via the accessibility
level on the setter function. However, some Stored properties never actually
have a setter synthesized, which led to the compiler dropping the setter
accessibility at serialization time. Rather than try to hack up something
clever, just store the setter accessibility explicitly in every
AbstractStorageDecl. (We still only serialize it for VarDecls, because
settable SubscriptDecls always have setter functions.)
<rdar://problem/17816530>
Swift SVN r20598
If importing a Clang module fails, we should report that at the location of
the import statement. This doesn't do that fully because it isn't transitive
(if Swift module Foo imports Swift module Bar, which fails to import Clang
module Baz, we don't get an error in user source), but it's a step forward
for the simple cases.
Swift SVN r20575
This replaces my egregious -initWithCoder:-specific hack with a more
reasonable general solution.
Replace my initWithCoder: hack with a proper
Swift SVN r20562
This allows us to express required initializers in the API notes. Use
it to smooth over NSString differences in the various SDKs even more.
Swift SVN r20511
To do this, we keep track of decls with superfluous typedefs (rather than
just the typedefs), and check for that. Tag decls without typedefs are
printed with the tag.
<rdar://problem/17569385>
Swift SVN r20221
We do this so that the swiftmodule file contains all info necessary to
reconstruct the AST for debugging purposes. If the swiftmodule file is copied
into a dSYM bundle, it can (in theory) be used to debug a built app months
later. The header is processed with -frewrite-includes so that it includes
any non-modular content; the user will not have to recreate their project
structure and header maps to reload the AST.
There is some extra complexity here: a target with a bridging header
(such as a unit test target) may depend on another target with a bridging
header (such as an app target). This is a rare case, but one we'd like to
still keep working. However, if both bridging headers import some common.h,
we have a problem, because -frewrite-includes will lose the once-ness
of #import. Therefore, we /also/ store the path, size, and mtime of a
bridging header in the swiftmodule, and prefer to use a regular parse from
the original file if it can be located and hasn't been changed.
<rdar://problem/17688408>
Swift SVN r20128
We're not using this for anything, yet, so there aren't any checked-in
tests. Also note that I'm using ".apinotesc" for the binary form of
API notes.
Swift SVN r20096
CGFloat is 32-bit on 32-bit architectures and 64-bit on 64-bit
architectures for historical reasons. Rather than having it alias
either Float (32-bit) or Double (64-bit), introduce a distinct struct
type for CGFloat. CGFloat provides a complete set of comparisons and
arithmetic operators (including tgmath functions), initializers allows
explicit conversion between it an Int, UInt, Float, and Double, as
well as conforming to all of the protocols that Float/Double do.
This formulation of CGFloat makes use of CGFloat
architecture-independent, although it still requires a number of casts.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17224725>
Swift SVN r19689
No validation is done yet on whether the user-specified access control makes
sense in context, but all ValueDecls should at least /have/ accessibility now.
/Still/ no tests yet. They will be much easier to write once we're actually
enforcing access control and/or printing access control.
Swift SVN r19143