*) cast optimizer: when a bridging cast is replaced with a function call and the owning convention of the instruction and the call parameter do not match, compensating retain/release instructions must be inserted.
*) cast optimizer: when a consuming dead cast instruction is removed a compensating release instruction must be inserted
*) mem2reg: An alloc_stack location which contains a destroy_addr must not be considered as a write-only location. The destroy_addr must be preserved.
rdar://problem/27601057
One minor revision: this lifts the proposed restriction against
overriding a non-open method with an open one. On reflection,
that was inconsistent with the existing rule permitting non-public
methods to be overridden with public ones. The restriction on
subclassing a non-open class with an open class remains, and is
in fact consistent with the existing access rule.
'fileprivate' is considered a broader level of access than 'private',
but for now both of them are still available to the entire file. This
is intended as a migration aid.
One interesting fallout of the "access scope" model described in
758cf64 is that something declared 'private' at file scope is actually
treated as 'fileprivate' for diagnostic purposes. This is something
we can fix later, once the full model is in place. (It's not really
/wrong/ in that they have identical behavior, but diagnostics still
shouldn't refer to a type explicitly declared 'private' as
'fileprivate'.)
As a note, ValueDecl::getEffectiveAccess will always return 'FilePrivate'
rather than 'Private'; for purposes of optimization and code generation,
we should never try to distinguish these two cases.
This should have essentially no effect on code that's /not/ using
'fileprivate' other than altered diagnostics.
Progress on SE-0025 ('fileprivate' and 'private')
This commit fixes a bug where we were not checking that all predecessors had the
cond_fail block as its only successor. This occured since we were bailing early
when we saw a constant. So if we saw a predecessor with a constant before a
predecessor that had multiple successors, we would optimize even though we would
be introducing an extra cond_fail along a path.
I added a new utility pass to test this code since so much is going on in
SimplifyCFG that it is difficult to construct a test case running the full
pass.
Really this code should be in a different pass (properly SIL Code Motion TBH).
But for now, this commit just fixes the bug.
rdar://26904047
Opened archetypes may be used by types of basic block arguments. Therefore, when performing the CSE of open_existential_ref instructions, one should also update the type of any basic block argument that may have used the archetype opened by the open_existential_ref being replaced.
rdar://problem/27386065
Strict aliasing only applies to memory operations that use strict
addresses. The optimizer needs to be aware of this flag. Uses of raw
addresses should not have their address substituted with a strict
address.
Also add Builtin.LoadRaw which will be used by raw pointer loads.
Exceptions can cause an exit before hitting the unsafeGuaranteedEnd instruction.
Make sure that we check post dominance to find such cases.
rdar://26890751
This enables things like redundant load elimination and should fix the
regression after changing ManagedBuffer(Pointer) to use unsafeAddressWithOwner.
rdar://27138023
Now we properly track the dependencies between instructions using opened archetypes and instructions opening those archetypes. No need for any special handling anymore.
Till now there was no way in SIL to explicitly express a dependency of an instruction on any opened archetypes used by it. This was a cause of many errors and correctness issues. In many cases the code was moved around without taking into account these dependencies, which resulted in breaking the invariant that any uses of an opened archetype should be dominated by the definition of this archetype.
This patch does the following:
- Map opened archetypes to the instructions defining them, i.e. to open_existential instructions.
- Introduce a helper class SILOpenedArchetypesTracker for creating and maintaining such mappings.
- Introduce a helper class SILOpenedArchetypesState for providing a read-only API for looking up available opened archetypes.
- Each SIL instruction which uses an opened archetype as a type gets an additional opened archetype operand representing a dependency of the instruction on this archetype. These opened archetypes operands are an in-memory representation. They are not serialized. Instead, they are re-constructed when reading binary or textual SIL files.
- SILVerifier was extended to conduct more thorough checks related to the usage of opened archetypes.
Now we properly track the dependencies between instructions using opened archetypes and instructions opening those archetypes. No need for any special handling anymore.
Till now there was no way in SIL to explicitly express a dependency of an instruction on any opened archetypes used by it. This was a cause of many errors and correctness issues. In many cases the code was moved around without taking into account these dependencies, which resulted in breaking the invariant that any uses of an opened archetype should be dominated by the definition of this archetype.
This patch does the following:
- Map opened archetypes to the instructions defining them, i.e. to open_existential instructions.
- Introduce a helper class SILOpenedArchetypesTracker for creating and maintaining such mappings.
- Introduce a helper class SILOpenedArchetypesState for providing a read-only API for looking up available opened archetypes.
- Each SIL instruction which uses an opened archetype as a type gets an additional opened archetype operand representing a dependency of the instruction on this archetype. These opened archetypes operands are an in-memory representation. They are not serialized. Instead, they are re-constructed when reading binary or textual SIL files.
- SILVerifier was extended to conduct more thorough checks related to the usage of opened archetypes.
Now we properly track the dependencies between instructions using opened archetypes and instructions opening those archetypes. No need for any special handling anymore.
Till now there was no way in SIL to explicitly express a dependency of an instruction on any opened archetypes used by it. This was a cause of many errors and correctness issues. In many cases the code was moved around without taking into account these dependencies, which resulted in breaking the invariant that any uses of an opened archetype should be dominated by the definition of this archetype.
This patch does the following:
- Map opened archetypes to the instructions defining them, i.e. to open_existential instructions.
- Introduce a helper class SILOpenedArchetypesTracker for creating and maintaining such mappings.
- Introduce a helper class SILOpenedArchetypesState for providing a read-only API for looking up available opened archetypes.
- Each SIL instruction which uses an opened archetype as a type gets an additional opened archetype operand representing a dependency of the instruction on this archetype. These opened archetypes operands are an in-memory representation. They are not serialized. Instead, they are re-constructed when reading binary or textual SIL files.
- SILVerifier was extended to conduct more thorough checks related to the usage of opened archetypes.
replaced by retain release code motion. This code has been disabled for sometime now.
This should bring the retain release code motion into a close. The retain release
code motion pipeline looks like this. There could be some minor cleanups after this though.
1. We perform a global data flow for retain release code motion in RRCM (RetainReleaseCodeMotion)
2. We perform a local form of retain release code motion in SILCodeMotion. This is more
for cases which can not be handled in RRCM. e.g. sinking into a switch is more efficiently
done in a local form, the retain is not needed on the None block. Release on SILArgument needs
to be split to incoming values, this can not be done in RRCM and other cases.
3. We do not perform code motion in ASO, only elimination which are very important.
Some modifications to test cases, they look different, but functionally the same.
RRCM has this canonicalization effect, i.e. it uses the rc root, instead of
the SSA value the retain/release is currently using. As a result some test cases need
to be modified.
I also removed some test cases that do not make sense anymore and lot of duplicate test
cases between earlycodemotion.sil and latecodemotion.sil. These tests cases only have retains
and should be used to test early code motion.
Several functionalities have been added to FSO over time and the logic has become
muddled.
We were always looking at a static image of the SIL and try to reason about what kind of
function signature related optimizations we can do.
This can easily lead to muddled logic. e.g. we need to consider 2 different function
signature optimizations together instead of independently.
Split 1 single function to do all sorts of different analyses in FSO into several
small transformations, each of which does a specific job. After every analysis, we produce
a new function and eventually we collapse all intermediate thunks to in a single thunk.
With this change, it will be easier to implement function signature optimization as now
we can do them independently now.
Small modifications to the test cases.
We don't sink open_existential_* instructions, because there may be some instructions depending on them, e.g. ametatype_inst, etc. But this kind of dependency cannot be expressed in SIL as a use yet. As a result, sinking open_existential may break the invariant that these instructions should dominate their uses.
