oneof/struct/protocol within a static method. The lookup is performed
on the metatype (as one would get when using qualified syntax
Type.member). Add tests to verify that this provides proper
overloading behavior.
As a drive-by, actually set the type of the implicit 'this' variable
during name binding for a non-static method.
Swift SVN r1394
syntax when name lookup finds multiple candidates. Overload resolution
is then used to select the best candidate and map the overloaded
member reference expression down to DotSyntaxCallExpr or
DotSyntaxBaseIgnoredExpr, as appropriate.
This implements part of <rdar://problem/11071641>, so that simple
overload resolution works, but there is still a bit of cleanup to do.
Swift SVN r1366
and is just an unmanaged pointer. Also, introduce a basic swift.string type.
This is progress towards rdar://10923403 and strings. Review welcome.
Swift SVN r1349
notion of a reference to a set of declarations. Introduce one derived
class, OverloadedDeclRefExpr, which covers the only case we currently
handle for overload resolution [*]: a direct (unqualified) reference
to an overloaded set of entities. Future subclasses should handle,
e.g., overloaded member references such as a.b or a.b.c.
[*] Ugly hacks for static methods notwithstanding
Swift SVN r1345
logic. This eliminates spurious diagnostics when attempting to coerce
(for overload resolution) between lvalues and rvalues. Also, improve
error recovery and diagnostics when dealing with an incorrect '&' in
the source.
Swift SVN r1344
I haven't really carefully considered whether existing type-checking etc. is correct for the main module (I think the name-binding rules need to be a bit different?), but it seems to work well enough for the obvious cases.
This is enough to get the one-liner "println(10)" to print "10" in "swift -i" mode, although the path to swift.swift still needs to be explicitly provided with -I.
Swift SVN r1325
not being called directly. We previously had a simplistic
implementation that required exact type matches; loosen this to simply
require coercion, as well as diagnosing ambiguities/lack of suitable
candidates.
Swift SVN r1316
single-parameter functions with a literal argument. The argument
therefore had unstructured dependent type, and there was no reason to
reject it in the first place.
Swift SVN r1313
types. Use this simple overload resolution scheme in both type
checking and type coercion, simplifying both code paths a bit.
There is one significant semantic change here: we allow overload
resolution to operate on (structured) dependent arguments, which
allows for more overload filtering before we come in with the type
coercion hammer. For example, we can now properly type-check
var x : int32;
x + 0;
Swift SVN r1310
one that performs the coercion on the AST and produces diagnostics for
any problems, and one that simply determines whether the coercion
would succeed. The former already existed (as
TypeChecker::convertToType), while an approximation of the latter was
already implemented as Expr::getRankOfConversionTo(). Unifying these
code paths addresses several issues:
- Lots of redundancy in the code for computing these two properties,
which causes bugs. For example, Expr::getRankOfConversionTo()
wasn't able to handle literals (!).
- Determining whether a conversion is possible will need the full
power of the type checker, e.g., to deal with closures in cases
like:
func f(g : (int, int) -> int);
func h() { f({$1 + 0}); }
Although this is not handled correctly now.
I have opted not to adopt Clang's ImplicitConversionSequence (or
InitializationSequence) design, which computes a record of the steps
needed to perform the conversion/coercion and later applies those
steps, because we don't need that complexity yet. If we start
introducing more implicit conversions into the language, we'll revisit
this decision.
Swift SVN r1308
expression will always be a two-element tuple, but it may not always
be a tuple literal. In the near future, it could also be a tuple
shuffle.
Swift SVN r1299
Unlike Type, it implements equality operators. It is returned by Type->getCanonicalType().
This adopts it in the minimal places required to get the build to work, it would also be nice
to switch IRGen to canonical types and use it there.
Swift SVN r1298
type with one or more elements of dependent type. Previously, an
expression such as (x, 5) would have the (unstructured) dependent
type, limiting our ability to type-check the subexpression 'x'
early. Now, if 'x' has type 'int' (for example), this expression will
now have the type (int, <<unstructured dependent type>>).
Extend coercion of a tuple to tuple type to handle coercion to
(structured) dependent tuple types, coercing element-by-element. This
code is very lightly tested and may still need to be restructured.
Swift SVN r1294
or binary context. This allows us to discard binary "-" candidates when in
a unary context. This is enough to resolve the last ambiguity, implementing
<rdar://problem/11088443> The expression "-1" always has type int
Swift SVN r1257
