- Don't pass 'verify' since it's now the default
- Update tests where diagnostics changed in a correct way to pass 'on' instead
- Delete compiler_scale/explicit_requirements_perf.swift since it's not testing anything with the requirement machine
Within the compiler, we use the term "layout constraint" for any
constraint that affects the layout of a type parameter that has that
constraint. However, the only user-visible constraint is "AnyObject",
and calling that a layout constraint is confusing. Drop the term
"layout" from diagnostics.
Fixes rdar://problem/35295372.
We had two slightly different codepaths to diagnose ': class'
in an inheritance clause where it is not supported.
For generic parameters, we would fix the 'class' to 'AnyObject',
but for associated types we didn't do this. Perform the fix in
all cases where it makes sense and remove one of the two
diagnostics.
There was a diagnostic to catch these, but it wasn't triggered
reliably, and it sounds like users were already relying on this
feature working in the few cases where it did.
So instead, just map an archetype's superclass into context
when building the archetype.
Recursion is still not allowed and is diagnosed, for example
<T, U where T : C<U>, U : C<T>>.
Note that compiler_crashers_fixed/00022-no-stacktrace.swift no
longer produces a diagnostic in Sema, despite the fact that the
code is invalid. It does diagnose in IRGen when we map the
type into context. Diagnosing in Sema requires fixing the
declaration checker to correctly handle recursion through a
generic signature. Right now, if recursion is detected, we bail
out, but do not always diagnose. Alternatively, we could
prohibit unbound generic types from appearing in generic
signatures.
This is a more principled fix for rdar://problem/24590570.
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
This only tackles the protocol case (<rdar://problem/17510790>); it
does not yet generalize to an arbitrary "class" requirement on either
existentials or generics.
Swift SVN r19896
