The reason why I am doing this is that I am going to be changing transferring to
not be a true ParamSpecifier. Instead, it is going to be a bit on Param that
changes the default ParamSpecifier used. That being said, I cannot use consuming
for this purpose since consuming today implies no implicit copy semantics, which
we do not want unless the user specifically asks for it by writing consuming.
Test shadowed variable of same type
Fully type check caller side macro expansion
Skip macro default arg caller side expr at decl primary
Test macro expand more complex expressions
Set synthesized expression as implicit
Add test case for with argument, not compiling currently
Test with swiftinterface
Always use the string representation of the default argument
Now works across module boundary
Check works for multiple files
Make default argument expression work in single file
Use expected-error
Disallow expression macro as default argument
Using as a sub expression in default argument still allowed as expression macros behave the same as built-in magic literals
Requirements for invertible protocols are always assumed to exist
unless opted-out via an inverse requirement. Thus, it's the
absence of those requirements that will (eventually) get mangled
into symbols.
When an actual instance of a distributed actor is on the local node, it is
has the capabilities of `Actor`. This isn't expressible directly in the type
system, because not all `DistributedActor`s are `Actor`s, nor is the
opposite true.
Instead, provide an API `DistributedActor.asLocalActor` that can only
be executed when the distributed actor is known to be local (because
this API is not itself `distributed`), and produces an existential
`any Actor` referencing that actor. The resulting existential value
carries with it a special witness table that adapts any type
conforming to the DistributedActor protocol into a type that conforms
to the Actor protocol. It is "as if" one had written something like this:
extension DistributedActor: Actor { }
which, of course, is not permitted in the language. Nonetheless, we
lovingly craft such a witness table:
* The "type" being extended is represented as an extension context,
rather than as a type context. This hasn't been done before, all Swift
runtimes support it uniformly.
* A special witness is provided in the Distributed library to implement
the `Actor.unownedExecutor` operation. This witness back-deploys to the
Swift version were distributed actors were introduced (5.7). On Swift
5.9 runtimes (and newer), it will use
`DistributedActor.unownedExecutor` to support custom executors.
* The conformance of `Self: DistributedActor` is represented as a
conditional requirement, which gets satisfied by the witness table
that makes the type a `DistributedActor`. This makes the special
witness work.
* The witness table is *not* visible via any of the normal runtime
lookup tables, because doing so would allow any
`DistributedActor`-conforming type to conform to `Actor`, which would
break the safety model.
* The witness table is emitted on demand in any client that needs it.
In back-deployment configurations, there may be several witness tables
for the same concrete distributed actor conforming to `Actor`.
However, this duplication can only be observed under fairly extreme
circumstances (where one is opening the returned existential and
instantiating generic types with the distributed actor type as an
`Actor`, then performing dynamic type equivalence checks), and will
not be present with a new Swift runtime.
All of these tricks together mean that we need no runtime changes, and
`asLocalActor` back-deploys as far as distributed actors, allowing it's
use in `#isolation` and the async for...in loop.
It's not clear that its worth keeping this as a
base class for SerializedAbstractClosure and
SerializedTopLevelCodeDecl, most clients are
interested in the concrete kinds, not only whether
the context is serialized.
I am doing this in preparation for adding options to SILParameterInfo/
SILResultInfo that state that a parameter/result is transferring. Even though I
could have just introduced a new bit here, I instead streamlined the interface
of SILParameterInfo/SILResultInfo to use an OptionSet instead of individual bits
to make it easier to add new flags here. The reason why it is easier is that
along API (e.x.: function argument) boundaries one does not have to marshal each
field or pass each field. Instead one can just pass the whole OptionSet as an
opaque thing. Using this I was able to change serialization/deserialization of
SILParameterInfo/SILResultInfo so that one does not need to update them if one
adds new fields!
The reason why I am doing this for both SILParameterInfo/SILResultInfo in the
same commit is because they share code in the demangler that I did not want to
have to duplicate in an intervening commit. By changing them both at the same
type, I didn't have to change anything without an actual need to.
I am doing this in a separate commit from adding transferring support so I can
validate correctness using the tests for the options already supported
(currently only differentiability).
rdar://119329771
This layout allows adding pre-specializations for trivial types that have a different size, but the same stride. This is especially useful for collections, where the stride is the important factor.
The errorUnion type operation specifies how thrown error types are
combined when multiple errors are thrown in the same context. When
thrown error types can have type variables in them, we sometimes cannot
resolve the errorUnion until the type variables have substitutions. In
such cases, we need to persist the result of errorUnion in the
constraint solver.
Introduce the ErrorUnionType to do exactly that, and update the core
errorUnion operation to produce an ErrorUnionType when needed. At
present, this code is inert, because any errorUnion operation today
involves only concrete types. However, inference of thrown errors in
closures will introduce type variables, and depend on this.
We already need to track the inverses separate from the members in a
ProtocolCompositionType, since inverses aren't real types. Thus, the
only purpose being served by InverseType is to be eliminated by
RequirementLowering when it appears in a conformance requirement.
Instead, we introduce separate type InverseRequirement just to keep
track of which inverses we encounter to facilitate cancelling-out
defaults and ensuring that the inverses are respected after running
the RequirementMachine.
Yet more preprocessor metaprogramming to eliminate per-macro-role boilerplate
in the compiler. This time, focused on mangling, demangling, and remangling
of the accessor macro roles.
This type will become the corresponding type that is resolved for an
`InverseTypeRepr`. This kind of type is not expected to appear past type
checking (currently, not even past requirement lowering!).
KeyPath's getter/setter/hash/equals functions have their own calling
convention, which receives generic arguments and embedded indices from a
given KeyPath argument buffer.
The convention was previously implemented by:
1. Accepting an argument buffer as an UnsafeRawPointer and casting it to
indices tuple pointer in SIL.
2. Bind generic arguments info from the given argument buffer while emitting
prologue in IRGen by creating a new forwarding thunk.
This 2-phase lowering approach was not ideal, as it blocked KeyPath
projection optimization [^1], and also required having a target arch
specific signature lowering logic in SIL-level [^2].
This patch centralizes the KeyPath accessor calling convention logic to
IRGen, by introducing `@convention(keypath_accessor_XXX)` convention in
SIL and lowering it in IRGen. This change unblocks the KeyPath projection
optimization while capturing subscript indices, and also makes it easier
to support WebAssembly target.
[^1]: https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/28799
[^2]: https://forums.swift.org/t/wasm-support/16087/21
Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
'MacroExpansionDecl' and 'MacroExpansionExpr' have many common methods.
Introduce a common base class 'FreestandingMacroExpansion' that holds
'MacroExpansionInfo'.
Factor out common expansion logic to 'evaluateFreestandingMacro'
function that resembles 'evaluateAttachedMacro'.
Macro expansions are currently written to disk using the mangled name of
the macro. Do not use operators that only differ in case-sensitivity to
avoid issues on case-insensitive filesystems.
Resolves rdar://109371653.
Attached macro mangles for accessors were using a fallback case that
triggers an assertion in +Asserts builds, and conflicting manglings is
non-Asserts builds. Provide a custom mangling for these cases that's
embedded in the identifier.
This is a narrow hack to eliminate an assertion. We are considering a
different approach for the long term that uses entity manglings with a
placeholder type, which will be more flexible long-term.
Expression macros ascribed to non-private contexts need private
discriminators so they don't conflict with other uses of the same macro
in other source files.
Thank you, Richard, for noticing this omission!
Eliminate another circular reference through macro expansion mangling
by adjusting the starting declaration context to ensure that it is from
a suitable "outer" context.
Fixes rdar://108511666.
The mangling of attached macro expansions based on the declaration to
which they are attached requires semantic information (specifically,
the interface type of that declaration) that caused cyclic
dependencies during type checking. Replace the mangling with a
less-complete mangling that only requires syntactic information from
the declaration, i.e., the name of the declaration to which the macro
was attached.
This eliminates reference cycles that occur with attached macros that
produce arbitrary names.
Add a private discriminator to the mangling of an outermost-private `MacroExpansionDecl` so that declaration macros in different files won't have colliding macro expansion buffer names.
rdar://107462515
