Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
Using a virutal output backend to capture all the outputs from
swift-frontend invocation. This allows redirecting and/or mirroring
compiler outputs to multiple location using different OutputBackend.
As an example usage for the virtual outputs, teach swift compiler to
check its output determinism by running the compiler invocation
twice and compare the hash of all its outputs.
Virtual output will be used to enable caching in the future.
`getValue` -> `value`
`getValueOr` -> `value_or`
`hasValue` -> `has_value`
`map` -> `transform`
The old API will be deprecated in the rebranch.
To avoid merge conflicts, use the new API already in the main branch.
rdar://102362022
Although the declaration of macros doesn't appear in Swift source code
that uses macros, they still operate as declarations within the
language. Rework `Macro` as `MacroDecl`, a generic value declaration,
which appropriate models its place in the language.
The vast majority of this change is in extending all of the various
switches on declaration kinds to account for macros.
Introduce `MacroExpansionExpr` and `MacroExpansionDecl` and plumb it through. Parse them in roughly the same way we parse `ObjectLiteralExpr`.
The syntax is gated under `-enable-experimental-feature Macros`.
This was a hole in the existing dependency tracking infrastructure. David managed to discover a way to exploit this bug to get a miscompile in rdar://74583179. There, members of extensions were not counted towards the interface hash of a type and so mutating them could lead to e.g. the wrong declaration being selected in an overload set.
To start tracking extensions, we need to add two new kinds of arcs:
1) A nominal arc to the extension
2) A member arc to the extension
Unfortunately, extensions are also unique in Swift in that they do not have a name to allow us to unique them. Luckily, we do have a way of identifying extensions: their fingerprint. These arcs are therefore emitted with the extended nominal type and the fingerprint of the extension as their context. This effectively invents a new nominal type for every extension.
It can be quite difficult to tell at a glance just how any particular decl is going to be converted into a key. The space of available template specializations is also 2-dimensional which adds an additional level of difficulty when the time comes to extend or refactor any of them. Unroll all of the templates into a builder that coalesces the commonalities of the ways DependencyKeys are built to combat this.
Remove this distinction without a difference. Originally, the thought
was to
1) Isolate the cross-module build infrastructure
2) Provide a signal to the driver that a dependency had swiftdeps info
in it
But the driver need only notice swiftmodule files as external
dependencies and try to extract that information if it can to divine the
signal it needs. Additionally, we can give it fingerprints as priors to
let it know there might be incremental info to be had.
This class was relying on the caller to keep this member alive. In general, this will lead to startling memory ownership bugs if, say, the enumerators were returned from these functions. Pass it in as a parameter instead to formalize that contract.
T *const does not prevent logically non-const accesses to the underlying data, it merely indicates that the pointer value itself is const. This modifier can be cast off by a copy, so it's not generally what you want here. Switch to const T * instead.
Invert the responsibility of the entrypoint so that FrontendTool is directing the actual serialization work. The entrypoint now solely exists to construct a dependency graph.
While I'm here, prepare the way for serializing dependency graphs for modules by optimistically modeling a ModuleOrSourceFile input.
Take advantage of the binary swiftdeps serialization utliities built during #32131. Add a new optional information block to swiftdeps files. For now, don't actually serialize swiftdeps information.
Frontends will use this information to determine whether to write incremental dependencies across modules into their swiftdeps files. We will then teach the driver to deserialize the data from this section and integrate it into its incremental decision making.
Strip mention of the SourceFile. Any FileUnit-esque thing that can provide top-level decls and `lookupClassMembers` works here - especially a ModuleDecl.
The final set of edges that were being registered cascading were external edges. Just mark these all private - they're duplicated into the swiftdeps for each file that imports a given (usually clang) module anyways.
This abstraction turns out to have hidden dependencies from the dependency verifier. Invert the dependency here and have it use the new enumerators in the DependencyRecorder instead.
Request-based incremental dependencies are enabled by default. For the time being, add a flag that will turn them off and switch back to manual dependency tracking.
