Convert a bunch of places where we're dumping to stderr and calling
`abort` over to using `ABORT` such that the message gets printed to
the pretty stack trace. This ensures it gets picked up by
CrashReporter.
In the below, 'Self.A.A' is not a type parameter; rather, since
'Self.A' is concretely known to be 'S', we resolve it as 'S.A',
which performs a name lookup and finds the concrete type alias 'A':
public struct S {
public typealias A = Int
}
public protocol P {
typealias A = S
}
public struct G<T> {}
public protocol Q: P {
typealias B = G<Self.A.A>
}
This is fine, but such a type alias should not participate in
the rewrite system. Let's exclude them like any other invalid
requirement.
The type alias itself is not an error; however, it is an error
to use it from a 'where' clause requirement. This is not
diagnosed yet, though.
Fixes rdar://136686001.
Some requirement machine work
Rename requirement to Value
Rename more things to Value
Fix integer checking for requirement
some docs and parser changes
Minor fixes
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
When we added same-shape requirements, we broke -analyze-requirement-machine,
which outputs some histograms. Add a regression test to make sure this code
path doesn't bitrot.
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
`getValue` -> `value`
`getValueOr` -> `value_or`
`hasValue` -> `has_value`
`map` -> `transform`
The old API will be deprecated in the rebranch.
To avoid merge conflicts, use the new API already in the main branch.
rdar://102362022
A same-shape requirement 'length(T...) == length(U...)' becomes a rewrite
rule 'T.[shape] => U.[shape]'. Reduced shape rules will drop the [shape]
term from each side of the rule, and create a same-shape requirement
between the two type parameter packs.
Types cannot contain Terms, so the Symbol representation uses
GenericTypeParameterTypes whose index refers to an array of
"substitution" Terms.
We can (ab)use the PrintOptions.AlternateTypeNames mechanism
to print those GenericTypeParamTypes as if they were Terms.
Previously we said that if P1 inherits from P2, then [P1:T] < [P2:T].
However, this didn't generalize to merged associated type symbols;
we always had [P1&P2:T] < [P3:T] even if P3 inherited from both P1
and P2.
This meant that the 'merge' operation did not preserve order, which
fired an assertion in the completion logic.
Fix this by generalizing the linear order to compare the 'support'
of protocols rather than the 'depth', where the 'support' is
defined as the size of the transitive closure of the set under
protocol inheritance.
Then, if you have something like
protocol P1 {}
protocol P2 {}
protocol P3 : P1, P2 {}
The support of 'P1 & P2' is 2, and the support of 'P3' is 3,
therefore [P3:T] < [P1&P2:T] in this example.
Fixes <rdar://problem/83768458>.
The canonical order on associated types compares the name before the
protocol, so for example T.[P2:A] < T.[P1:B]. Make sure the reduction
order does the same so that we correctly compute canonical types in
this case.
