Swift does not support storing fields in the padding of the previous
fields just yet, so let's not import fields like that from C++.
Represent them as opaque blobs instead.
Fixes#80764
rdar://149072458
Zero sized fields are messing up the offset calculations when we import
C++ fields to Swift. We assume that the size of the field is determined
by the type of the field. This is not true for fields marked with
no_unique_address. Those fields can have 0 size while the
sizeof(decltype(field)) is still 1.
rdar://143907490
In C++, a primary base class that is placed in the beginning of the type's memory layout isn't always the type that is the first in the list of bases – the base types might be laid out in memory in a different order.
This makes sure that IRGen handles base types of C++ structs in the correct order.
This fixes an assertion in asserts-enabled compilers, and an out-of-memory error in asserts-disabled compilers. The issue was happening for both value types and foreign reference types. This change also includes a small refactoring to reuse the logic between the two code paths.
rdar://140848603
In C++, a field of a derived class might be placed into the tail padding of a base class. Swift was not handling this case correctly, causing an asserts-disabled compiler to run out of RAM, and an asserts-enabled compiler to fail with an assertion.
Fixes this IRGen assertion:
```
Assertion failed: (offset >= NextOffset && "adding fields out of order"), function addField, file GenStruct.cpp, line 1509.
```
rdar://138764929
So call the destroy on the closing type instead.
Amends the concepts areFieldsABIAccessible/isABIAccessible to take metadata
accessibility of non-copyable types into account.
rdar://133990500
Instead of adding opaque fields for the base subobjects this patch
introduces a recursive walk to add all the base fields to the generated
Swift struct.
rdar://126754931
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
Call `swift_clearSensitive` after destroying or taking "sensitive" struct types.
Also, support calling C-functions with "sensitive" parameters or return values. In SIL, sensitive types are address-only and so are sensitive parameters/return values.
Though, (small) sensitive C-structs are passed directly to/from C-functions. We need re-abstract such parameter and return values for C-functions.
This fixes an assertion failure when building certain projects for arm64e with `-use-clang-function-types` Swift compiler flag:
```
Expected non-null Clang type for @convention(c)/@convention(block) function but found nullptr
```
rdar://121227452
If the field address comes from a struct_element_addr which is a result of an optimized `MemoryLayout<S>.offset(of: \.field)` we cannot return undef.
We have to be consistent with `offset(of:)`, which returns 0.
Therefore we need to return the base address of the struct.
rdar://117265274
Fix a bug in expandExternalSignatureTypes where it wasn't annotating a function call parameter type with sret when the result was being returned indirectly.
The bug was causing calls to ObjC methods that return their results indirectly to crash.
Additionally, fix the return type for C++ constructors computed in expandExternalSignatureTypes. Previously, the return type was always void even on targets that require constructors to return this (e.g., Apple arm64), which was causing C++ constructor thunks to be emitted needlessly.
Resolves rdar://121618707
First, "can have an absence of Copyable" is a rather confusing notion,
so the query is flipped to "can be Copyable". Next, it's more robust to
ask if a conformance exists for the TypeDecl to answer that question,
rather than trying to replicate what happens within that conformance
lookup.
Also renames `TypeDecl::isEscapable` to match.
The previous implementation assumes `UnsafePointer` has no requirements
on its generic parameter. This fix handles any requirements that may be
present on the parameter. With NoncopyableGenerics, the generic
parameter actually does gain a requirement.
I've renamed the method to `TypeDecl::isNoncopyable`, because the query
doesn't make sense for many other kinds of `ValueDecl`'s beyond the
`TypeDecl`'s. In fact, it looks like no one was relying on that anyway.
Thus, we now have a distinction where in Sema, you ask whether
a `Type` or `TypeDecl` is "Noncopyable". But within SIL, we still
preserve the notion of "move-only" since there is additionally the
move-only type wrapper for types that otherwise support copying.
Moving the query implementation up to the AST library from SIL will allow
conveniences to be written on specific AST element classes. For instance, this
will allow `EnumDecl` to expose a convenience that enumerates element decls
that are available during lowering.
Also, improve naming and documentation for these queries.
Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
* [IRGen] Support additional single payload enum cases in layout strings
rdar://105837101
Adds layout string support for single payload enums with simple (non-scattered) extra inhabitant patterns
* Add more test cases
