This commit teaches parser to parse two libSyntax nodes: FunctionCallArgument and
FunctionCallArgumentList. Along with the change, some libSyntax parsing infrastructure changes
as well: (1) parser doesn't directly insert token into the buffer for libSyntax node creation;
instead, when creating a simple libSyntax node like integer literal expression, parser should indicate the location of the last token in the node; (2) implicit libSyntax nodes like empty
statement list must contain a source location indicating where the implicit nodes should appear
(immediately before the token at the given location).
This commit teaches parser to generate code block syntax node. As a support for this,
SyntaxParsingContext can be created by a single syntax kind, indicating the whole context
should be parsed into a node of that given syntax. Another change is to bridge created syntax
node with the given context kind. For instance, if a statement context results into an expression
node, the expression node will be bridged to a statement by wrapping it with a ExpressionStmt
node.
In a multipart #available spec list, don't attempt to look at the SpecResult for the previous part if there wasn't one (a missing version number for example).
Added a test case that asserted before this change.
the item list if we find it. (While still erroring that we expected a brace on the first bad token.) Improves recovery in general and in SR-5943 in particular.
This patch allows Parser to generate a refined token stream to satisfy tooling's need. For syntax coloring, token stream from lexer is insufficient because (1) we have contextual keywords like get and set; (2) we may allow keywords to be used as argument labels and names; and (3) we need to split tokens like "==<". In this patch, these refinements are directly fulfilled through parsing without additional heuristics. The refined token vector is optionally saved in SourceFile instance.
This fixes various issues with getting no code-completion in top-level
code containing array/dictionary sugar, such as:
```
for x in [<HERE>] {}
for x in [1: 2, <HERE>] {}
```
And also removes the index variable from completions inside the sequence
(it was coming through as a local variable with <<error type>>).
rdar://problem/33884082
For normal completions it behaves the same as PostfixExprBeginning, but
it provides a hook for clients to provide a custom completion for this
position. For example, you might want to a x ..< y snippet in this
position.
rdar://problem/29910383
In anticipation of future attributes, and perhaps the ability to
declare lvalues with specifiers other than 'let' and 'var', expand
the "isLet" bit into a more general "specifier" field.
Resolves: https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4426
* Make IfConfigDecl be able to hold ASTNodes
* Parse #if as IfConfigDecl
* Stop enclosing toplevel #if into TopLevelCodeDecl.
* Eliminate IfConfigStmt
Replace `NameOfType foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)` with DRY version `auto foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)`.
The DRY auto version is by far the dominant form already used in the repo, so this PR merely brings the exceptional cases (redundant repetition form) in line with the dominant form (auto form).
See the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#es11-use-auto-to-avoid-redundant-repetition-of-type-names) for a general discussion on why to use `auto` to avoid redundant repetition of type names.
* [Parse] Add diagnostic for mixed syntax availability attribute
When parsing a list of availablity specifications in the shorthand syntax, check to see that the next specification is also in shorthand syntax. If the next specification looks like an explicit “deprecated” (or similad) attribute, then emit a specific diagnostic about it to help the developer understand the problem.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4231
* [Parse] Add fix-it for single mixed availability syntax
For the scenario that’s described in SR-4231, when there is one shorthard syntax followed by ‘deprecated’ (or similar), then we can guess that the intention was to treat the shorthand as ‘introduced’ so that the two of them work together.
This guess is only made if there is one platform version constrain, that is followed by ‘deprecated’, ‘renamed’, etc. but not ‘introduced’.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4231
* Automatic formatting using git-clang-format
* Fix typos in test code and language in comment
Also, consistently names test functions as “deprecated” and "introduced"
* [Parse] Add note to explain the mixed availability syntax fix-it insertion
This change also moves the fix-it from the error to the note.
* Narrow allowance of 3+ components numeric literal to condition part of the
directive.
* Allow 3+ components in '#if' directive in decl list position as well.
This is a temporary stop-gap for getting round-trip parsing
off the ground. The real fix, not re-injecting declarations
into an if-config's declaration context, is a deep dive and
is still ongoing.
Add diagnostics to fix decls with consecutive identifiers. This applies to
types, properties, variables, and enum cases. The diagnostic adds a camel-cased option if it is different than the first option.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3599
Parsing declaration list (e.g. member list of nominal decl) is very
different from comma separated list, because it's elements are separated with
new-line or semi-colon. There's no good reason to consolidate them.
Also, declaration list in 'extension' or inside of decl '#if' didn't
emit diagnostics for consecutive declarations on a line.
class C {
#if true
var value: Int = 42 func foo() {}
#endif
}
extension C {
func bar() {} subscript(i: Int) -> Int {
return 24
}
}
This change consolidates declaration list parsing for
members of nominal decls, extensions, and inside of '#if'.
In addition, removed unnecessary property 'TrailingSemiLoc' from decl.
This reverts the contents of #5778 and replaces it with a far simpler
implementation of condition resolution along with canImport. When
combined with the optimizations in #6279 we get the best of both worlds
with a performance win and a simpler implementation.
* Pack the bits for IfConfigDecls into Decl
* Don't open symbols into a module when evaluating canImport statements
The module loaders now have API to check whether a given module can be
imported without importing the referenced module. This provides a
significant speed boost to condition resolution and no longer
introduces symbols from the referenced module into the current context
without the user explicitly requesting it.
The definition of ‘canImport’ does not necessarily mean that a full
import without error is possible, merely that the path to the import is
visible to the compiler and the module is loadable in some form or
another.
Note that this means this check is insufficient to guarantee that you
are on one platform or another. For those kinds of checks, use
‘os(OSNAME)’.
Fixes SR-2757.
Variables in capture lists are treated as 'let' constants, which can
result in misleading, incorrect diagnostics. Mark them as such in order
to produce better diagnostics, by adding an extra parameter to the
VarDecl initializer.
Alternatively, these variables could be marked as implicit, but that
results in other diagnostic problems: capture list variables that are
never used produce warnings, but these warnings aren't normally emitted for
implicit variables. Other assertions in the compiler also misfire when
these variables are treated as implicit.
Another alternative would be to walk up the AST and determine whether
the `VarDecl`, but there doesn't appear to be a way to do so.
