Key paths can't reference non-escapable or non-copyable storage declarations,
so we don't need to refer to them resiliently, and can elide their property
descriptors.
However, declarations may still be conditionally Copyable and Escapable, and
if so, then they still need a property descriptor for resilient key path
references. When a property or subscript can be used in a context where it
is fully Copyable and Escapable, emit the property descriptor in a generic
environment constrained by the necessary conditional constraints.
Fixes rdar://151628396.
When generating SIL for an `if #available(SomeDomain)` query in code being
compiled for a zippered target, the generated code was mis-compiled if
`SomeDomain` were disabled at compile time. Empty version ranges need to be
handled explicitly by `SILGenFunction::emitZipperedOSVersionRangeCheck()`.
SILGen still miscompiles `if #unavailable` queries generally in code compiled
for a zippered target (rdar://147929876).
Resolves rdar://150888941.
Consider an `@_alwaysEmitIntoClient` function and a custom derivative
defined
for it. Previously, such a combination resulted different errors under
different
circumstances.
Sometimes, there were linker errors due to missing derivative function
symbol -
these occurred when we tried to find the derivative in a module, while
it
should have been emitted into client's code (and it did not happen).
Sometimes, there were SIL verification failures like this:
```
SIL verification failed: internal/private function cannot be serialized or serializable: !F->isAnySerialized() || embedded
```
Linkage and serialization options for the derivative were not handled
properly,
and, instead of PublicNonABI linkage, we had Private one which is
unsupported
for serialization - but we need to serialize `@_alwaysEmitIntoClient`
functions
so the client's code is able to see them.
This patch resolves the issue and adds proper handling of custom
derivatives
of `@_alwaysEmitIntoClient` functions. Note that either both the
function and
its custom derivative or none of them should have
`@_alwaysEmitIntoClient`
attribute, mismatch in this attribute is not supported.
The following cases are handled (assume that in each case client's code
uses
the derivative).
1. Both the function and its derivative are defined in a single file in
one module.
2. Both the function and its derivative are defined in different files
which
are compiled to a single module.
3. The function is defined in one module, its derivative is defined in
another
module.
4. The function and the derivative are defined as members of a protocol
extension in two separate modules - one for the function and one for the
derivative. A struct conforming the protocol is defined in the third
module.
5. The function and the derivative are defined as members of a struct
extension in two separate modules - one for the function and one for the
derivative.
The changes allow to define derivatives for methods of `SIMD`.
Fixes#54445
<!--
If this pull request is targeting a release branch, please fill out the
following form:
https://github.com/swiftlang/.github/blob/main/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/release.md?plain=1
Otherwise, replace this comment with a description of your changes and
rationale. Provide links to external references/discussions if
appropriate.
If this pull request resolves any GitHub issues, link them like so:
Resolves <link to issue>, resolves <link to another issue>.
For more information about linking a pull request to an issue, see:
https://docs.github.com/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue
-->
<!--
Before merging this pull request, you must run the Swift continuous
integration tests.
For information about triggering CI builds via @swift-ci, see:
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/main/docs/ContinuousIntegration.md#swift-ci
Thank you for your contribution to Swift!
-->
`zeroInitializer` is blocking optimizations, but it is not needed because the closure of `Builtin.emplace` will initialize the memory anyway.
We only need to tell mandatory passes that this memory should be treated as initialized.
When the called closure throws an error, it needs to clean up the buffer.
This means that the buffer is uninitialized at this point.
We need an `end_lifetime` so that the move-only checker doesn't insert a wrong `destroy_addr` because it thinks that the buffer is initialized.
Fixes a mis-compile.
rdar://151461109
This ensures that when we generate the vtable thunk for a
nonisolated(nonsending) override (or vis-a-versa), we get the ABI correct. I
also added tests for all of the relevant cases for vtables that we check for
protocols.
rdar://151394209
This will cause tests today to crash since even though we are placing the
isolation now, to make it easier to read, I left in the old isolation selecting
code. This code uses the witness's isolation instead of the requirement's
isolation which is incorrect since the protocol witness thunk needs to look the
requirement from an ABI perspective since the two must be substitutable. The
crash comes from the ABI verification I added in earlier commits.
Custom main and global executors work hasn't passed Swift Evolution yet,
so we need to avoid leaking it as API until it does.
To that end, underscore all the things.
rdar://151147606
Due to a bug in how macros on nodes imported from clang are evaluated,
their function body is not always type checked. This forces type
checking before silgen of a macro originating on a node imported from
clang, to prevent crashing in silgen.
rdar://150940383
Some notes:
1. In most cases, I think we were getting lucky with this by just inferring the
closure's isolation from its decl context. In the specific case that we were
looking at here, this was not true since we are returning from an @concurrent
async function a nonisolated(nonsending) method that closes over self. This
occurs since even when NonisolatedNonsendingByDefault we want to start importing
objc async functions as nonisolated(nonsending).
2. I also discovered that in the ActorIsolationChecker we were not visiting the
inner autoclosure meaning that we never set the ActorIsolation field on the
closure. After some discussion with @xedin about potentially visiting the
function in the ActorIsolationChecker, we came to the conclusion that this was
likely to result in source stability changes. So we put in a targeted fix just
for autoclosures in this specific case by setting their actor isolation in the
type checker.
3. Beyond adding tests to objc_async_from_swift to make sure that when
NonisolatedNonsendingByDefault is disabled we do the right thing, I noticed that
we did not have any tests that actually tested the behavior around
objc_async_from_swift when NonisolatedNonsendingByDefault is enabled. So I added
the relevant test lines so we can be sure that we get correct behavior in such a
case.
rdar://150209093
Instead of passing in the substituted type, we pass in the
InFlightSubstitution. This allows the substituted type to be
recovered if needed, but we can now skip computing it for
the common case of LookUpConformanceInSubstitutionMap.
This replaces the oddly-named mapIntoTypeExpansionContext() method
on SubstitutionMap itself in favor of a global function, just like
the ones that take Type and ProtocolConformanceRef.
[silgen] When emitting a foreign async completion handler for a method, use merge isolation region to tie self and the block storage into the same region.
This is an extension of a similar problem that I had fixed earlier where due to
the usage of intermediate Sendable types we do not propagate regions correctly.
The previous issue I fixed was that we were not properly tieing the result of a
foreign async completion handler to the block storage since we used an
intervening UnsafeContinuation (which is Sendable) to propagate the result into
the block storage. I fixed this by changing SILGen to insert a
merge_isolation_region that explicitly ties the result to the block storage.
This new issue is that the block that we create and then pass as the completion
handler is an @Sendable block. Thus when we call the actual objc_method, the
block storage and self are not viewed as being in the same region. In this PR, I
change it so that we add a merge_isolation_region from self onto the block
storage.
The end result of this is that we have that self, the result of the call, and
the block storage are all in the same region meaning that we properly diagnose
that returning an NSObject from the imported Objective-C function is task
isolated and thus we cannot return it as a sending result.
rdar://131422332
We are performing a cast instead of a dyn_cast in an if statement. This will
assert on failure rather than fall through. It seems to be an obvious typo. I
checked in the actual commit in question that introduced it and the intention
was to be a dyn_cast.
rdar://149698148
Store specialize witness tables in a separate lookup table in the module. This allows that for a normal conformance there can exist the original _and_ a specialized witness table.
Also, add a boolean property `isSpecialized` to `WitnessTable` which indicates whether the witness table is specialized or not.
Don't bind references to storage to use (new ABI) coroutine accessors
unless they're guaranteed to be available. For example, when building
against a resilient module that has coroutine accessors, they can only
be used if the deployment target is >= the version of Swift that
includes the feature.
rdar://148783895
A metatype for an archetype or existential with no (non-marker)
protocol requirements cannot, by definition, carry any (isolated)
protocol conformances with it, so it's safe to treat such metatypes as
Sendable.
Avoids an assertion failure emitting an `explicit_copy_value` on the trivial
value, which is unsupported. This allows `copy x` to compile, albeit with
no effect (which is not ideal, but also not a regression, since no-implicit-copy
controls still don't fully work on trivial values). Fixes#80573 and rdar://148712387.
We decided that using a magic typealias to set the executor factory was better
than using a compiler option. Remove the `-executor-factory` option, and replace
by looking up the `DefaultExecutorFactory` type, first in the main module, and
then if that fails in Concurrency.
rdar://149058236
Now that coroutine kind (and consequently ABI) for the accessors is
keyed off a SIL option, it's no longer possible to read whether a given
SILFunction arose from a read/modify coroutine just by checking its
coroutine kind. Regardless of ABI, read/modify coroutines may only
unwind (i.e. are only permitted not to "run to completion") if the
relevant experimental (soon to be deleted) feature is enabled.
