The `CollectionDifference` type has a few different invariants
that were not being validated when initializing using the type's
`Decodable` conformance, since the type was using the
autogenerated `Codable` implementation. This change provides
manual implementations of the `Encodable` and `Decodable`
requirements, and adds tests that validate the failure when trying
to decode invalid JSON for CollectionDifference (and a few other
types).
Introduce checking of ConcurrentValue conformances:
- For structs, check that each stored property conforms to ConcurrentValue
- For enums, check that each associated value conforms to ConcurrentValue
- For classes, check that each stored property is immutable and conforms
to ConcurrentValue
Because all of the stored properties / associated values need to be
visible for this check to work, limit ConcurrentValue conformances to
be in the same source file as the type definition.
This checking can be disabled by conforming to a new marker protocol,
UnsafeConcurrentValue, that refines ConcurrentValue.
UnsafeConcurrentValue otherwise his no specific meaning. This allows
both "I know what I'm doing" for types that manage concurrent access
themselves as well as enabling retroactive conformance, both of which
are fundamentally unsafe but also quite necessary.
The bulk of this change ended up being to the standard library, because
all conformances of standard library types to the ConcurrentValue
protocol needed to be sunk down into the standard library so they
would benefit from the checking above. There were numerous little
mistakes in the initial pass through the stsandard library types that
have now been corrected.
- Add an underscore to private/internal symbols
- Make access levels explicit, even when they’re implied from context
- Conform to max line length of 80 characters
- Conformances declared on separate extensions that implement them
- Arrange member declarations so that stored properties appear first
- Expand single-letter function and type parameter names where there is an obvious name that’s more descriptive
- RangeReplaceableCollection.fastApplicationEnumeration → CollectionDifference._fastEnumeratedApply
