In a back deployment scenario, this will provide a place where one could provide
function implementations that are not available in the relevant stdlib.
This is just setting up for future work and isn't doing anything interesting
beyond wiring it up/making sure that it is wired up correctly with tests.
In a back deployment scenario, this will provide a place where one could provide
function implementations that are not available in the relevant stdlib.
This is just setting up for future work and isn't doing anything interesting
beyond wiring it up/making sure that it is wired up correctly with tests.
Most of the changes fall into a few categories:
* Replace explicit "x86_64" with %target-cpu in lit tests
* Cope with architecture differences in IR/asm/etc. macOS-specific tests
We use one bit of the third reserved swift private tls key.
Also move the functionality into a separate static archive that is
always linked dependent on deployment target.
Many build systems that support Swift don't use swiftc to drive the linker. To make things
easier for these build systems, also use autolinking to pull in the needed compatibility
libraries. This is less ideal than letting the driver add it at link time, since individual
compile jobs don't know whether they're building an executable or not. Introduce a
`-disable-autolink-runtime-compatibility` flag, which build systems that do drive the linker
with swiftc can pass to avoid autolinking.
rdar://problem/50057445
