Certain traps can't be supported on WASI, such as expectations for crashes, `setjmp` use, dynamic linking, multi-threading etc. These tests are marked as `UNSUPPORTED` when targeting Wasm/WASI.
This replaces swiftMSVCRT with swiftCRT. The big difference here is
that the `visualc` module is no longer imported nor exported. The
`visualc` module remains in use for a singular test wrt availability,
but this should effectively remove the need for the `visualc` module.
The difference between the MSVCRT and ucrt module was not well
understood by most. MSVCRT provided ucrt AND visualc, combining pieces
of the old MSVCRT and the newer ucrt. The ucrt module is what you
really wanted most of the time, however, would need to use MSVCRT for
the convenience aliases for type-generic math and the deprecated math
constants.
Unfortunately, we cannot shadow the `ucrt` module and create a Swift SDK
overlay for ucrt as that seems to result in circular dependencies when
processing the `_Concurrency` module.
Although this makes using the C library easier for most people, it has a
more important subtle change: it cleaves the dependency on visualc.
This means that this enables use of Swift without Visual Studio for the
singular purpose of providing 3 header files. Additionally, it removes
the need for the installation of 2 of the 4 support files. This greatly
simplifies the deployment process on Windows.
Clean up a few general patterns that are now obviated by canImport
This aligns more generally with the cleanup that the Swift Package
Manager has already done in their automated XCTest-plumbing tool in
apple/swift-package-manager#1826.
These tests are marked XFAIL or UNSUPPORTED because either the tests:
require libc annotation, require Mach-O support, don't recognize calls to
swift-autolink-extract, requires porting alongside Linux, or rely on simd
which is not present.
Additionally, explicit REQUIRES for tsan/asan/fuzzer are added to some
tests, since OpenBSD does not support these sanitizers or fuzzers, since
it's nicer to mark that with REQUIRES rather than XFAIL.
Different tests used different os checks for importing Darwin, Glibc and
MSVCRT. This commit use the same pattern for importing those libraries,
in order to avoid the #else branches of the incorrect patterns to be
applied to the wrong platform. This was very normal for Android, which
normally should follow the Linux branches, but sometimes was trying to
import Darwin or not importing anything.
The standarized pattern imports Darwin for macOS, iOS, tvOS and watchOS.
It imports Glibc for Linux, FreeBSD, PS4, Android, Cygwin and Haiku; and
imports MSVCRT for Windows. If a new platform is introduced, the else
branch will report an error, so the new platform can be added to one of
the branches (or maybe add a new specific branch).
In some cases the standard pattern was modified because some test required
it (importing extra modules, or extra type aliases), and in some other
cases some branches were removed because the test will not have used
them (but it is not exhaustive, so there might be some unnecessary
branches).
This should, at least, fix three tests for Android (the three
dynamic_replacement*.swift ones).
Avoid a temporary file and executing FileCheck multiple types and prefer
multiple check prefixes and streaming. Additionally, enable some of
previously XFAIL'ed tests on Linux as well as tests that were marked as
requiring Objective-C interop.
Similarly to Clang, the flag enables coverage instrumentation, and links
`libLLVMFuzzer.a` to the produced binary.
Additionally, this change affects the driver logic, and enables the
concurrent usage of multiple sanitizers.
LLVM r300769 removed support for these options. There were a series of
earlier changes in Clang (r281432, r300738, r300744, r300767) that probably
ought be have matches changes in Swift.
Tracking that in rdar://problem/31924006
"Sanitizer Coverage" with a new flag ``-sanitize-coverage=``. This
flag is analogous to Clang's ``-fsanitize-coverage=``.
This instrumentation currently requires ASan or TSan to be enabled
because the module pass created by ``createSanitizerCoverageModulePass()``
inserts calls into functions found in compiler-rt's "sanitizer_common".
"sanitizer_common" is not shipped as an individual library but instead
exists in several of the sanitizer runtime libraries so we have to
link with one of them to avoid linking errors.
The rationale between adding this feature is to allow experimentation
with libFuzzer which currently relies on "Sanitizer Coverage"
instrumentation.
