Include the initial implementation of _StringGuts, a 2-word
replacement for _LegacyStringCore. 64-bit Darwin supported, 32-bit and
Linux support in subsequent commits.
This allows String, Array, Dictionary, and Set to be passed as variadic arguments to Cocoa APIs like NSLog, NSPredicate, stringWithFormat:, etc. rdar://problem/27651717
One last bit of SE-0072. We shouldn't fall back to bridged classes in the absence of type context for literals anymore. By itself, this kind of hoses the use of literals with NS types, but I think we can get most of the QoI back with overlay changes I plan to propose following this.
As part of the extensive work on value types in Foundation this year, we
decided to also add value types for these three key classes. In addition
to adding value semantics, the API was extensively audited to improve
Swift interop (especially Calendar).
rdar://26628184
This reverts commit 46a9f57329.
This broke Swift CI, OSS incremental RA:
./swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/TimeZone.swift:228:45: error: 'NSTimeZone' is not implicitly convertible to 'TimeZone'; did you mean to use 'as' to explicitly convert?
return lhs._wrapped.isEqual(to: rhs._wrapped)
As part of the extensive work on value types in Foundation this year, we
decided to also add value types for these three key classes. In addition
to adding value semantics, the API was extensively audited to improve
Swift interop (especially Calendar).
rdar://26628184
This reverts commit 9c1f21bdf0.
This breaks swift-ci for everyone:
stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/Calendar.swift:426:74: error: 'DateInterval' is only available on iOS 10.0 or newer
public func dateInterval(of component: Component, for date: Date) -> DateInterval? {
As part of the extensive work on value types in Foundation this year, we
decided to also add value types for these three key classes. In addition
to adding value semantics, the API was extensively audited to improve
Swift interop (especially Calendar).
rdar://26628184
Most of this is in updating the standard library, SDK overlays, and
piles of test cases to use the new names. No surprises here, although
this shows us some potential heuristic tweaks.
There is one substantive compiler change that needs to be factored out
involving synthesizing calls to copyWithZone()/copy(zone:). Aside from
that, there are four failing tests:
Swift :: ClangModules/objc_parse.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/Foundation_test.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/archiving_generic_swift_class.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/objc_currying.swift
due to two independent remaining compiler bugs:
* We're not getting partial ordering between NSCoder's
encode(AnyObject, forKey: String) and NSKeyedArchiver's version of
that method, and
* Dynamic lookup (into AnyObject) doesn't know how to find the new
names. We need the Swift name lookup tables enabled to address this.
There's still work left to do. In terms of next steps, there's still rdar://problem/22126141, which covers removing the 'workaround' overloads for print (that prevent bogus overload resolution failures), as well as providing a decent diagnostic when users invoke print with 'appendNewline'.
Swift SVN r30976
Fixes rdar://problem/19169066
Now that some implicit bridging conversions were removed, we can remove some of
the complex String comparison overloads. We could not remove all of them yet, as
String to NSString implicit bridging still exists. To work around this,
unavailable annotations were used. This ensures the user always gets the String
comparison function they intended.
Swift SVN r24536
Require 'as' when converting from Objective-C type to native type (but
continue to allow implicit conversion from native to Objective-C). This
conversion constraint is called ExplicitConversion; all implicit
conversions are covered by the existing Conversion constraint. Update
standard library and tests to match.
Swift SVN r24496
Previously the "as" keyword could either represent coercion or or forced
downcasting. This change separates the two notions. "as" now only means
type conversion, while the new "as!" operator is used to perform forced
downcasting. If a program uses "as" where "as!" is called for, we emit a
diagnostic and fixit.
Internally, this change removes the UnresolvedCheckedCastExpr class, in
favor of directly instantiating CoerceExpr when parsing the "as"
operator, and ForcedCheckedCastExpr when parsing the "as!" operator.
Swift SVN r24253
There's a bit of a reshuffle of the ExplicitCastExpr subclasses:
- The existing ConditionalCheckedCastExpr expression node now represents
"as?".
- A new ForcedCheckedCastExpr node represents "as" when it is a
downcast.
- CoerceExpr represents "as" when it is a coercion.
- A new UnresolvedCheckedCastExpr node describes "as" before it has
been type-checked down to ForcedCheckedCastExpr or CoerceExpr. This
wasn't a strictly necessary change, but it helps us detangle what's
going on.
There are a few new diagnostics to help users avoid getting bitten by
as/as? mistakes:
- Custom errors when a forced downcast (as) is used as the operand
of postfix '!' or '?', with Fix-Its to remove the '!' or make the
downcast conditional (with as?), respectively.
- A warning when a forced downcast is injected into an optional,
with a suggestion to use a conditional downcast.
- A new error when the postfix '!' is used for a contextual
downcast, with a Fix-It to replace it with "as T" with the
contextual type T.
Lots of test updates, none of which felt like regressions. The new
tests are in test/expr/cast/optionals.swift.
Addresses <rdar://problem/17000058>
Swift SVN r18556
