This hit an assertion I was trying to add to make
sure we don't try to recursively type-check when
type-checking a closure. Currently we can end up
type-checking the initializer for `x` while generating
constraints for the closure due to the fact that we
eagerly compute the interface type for the backing
lazy storage var. We ought to make that computation
lazy, but in the mean time, add this test case.
Unfortunately we've encountered another source
breaking case here:
```
class C {
func method() {}
func foo() {
Task { [weak self] in
Task {
method()
}
}
}
}
```
In 5.10 we'd only do the unqualified lookup for
`self` when directly in a `weak self` closure,
but with the implicit self rework, we'd start
using the `weak self` here, leading to a
type-checker error.
At this point, adding more edge cases to the
existing logic is going to make things much more
complicated. Instead, reinstate the 5.10 implicit
self lookup behavior and diagnostic logic,
switching over to the new logic only under Swift 6
mode.
rdar://129475277
In 5.10 we warned on this:
```swift
func bar(@_implicitSelfCapture _ fn: @escaping () -> Void) {}
class C {
func foo() {
bar { [weak self] in
foo()
}
}
}
```
But with the implicit self rework, this accidentally
became an error. Fix it to ensure we continue to
warn until Swift 6 mode.
rdar://128941797
Start classifying all potential throw sites within a constraint
system and associate them with the nearest enclosing catch node. Then,
determine the thrown error type for a given catch node by taking the
union of the thrown errors at each potential throw site. Use this to
compute the error type thrown from the body of a `do..catch` block
within a closure.
This behavior is limited to the upcoming feature `FullTypedThrows`.
If a closure doesn't have a contextual type inferred yet it should
be delayed in favor of already resolved closure conjunction because
"resolving" such a closure early could miss result builder attribute
attached to a parameter the closure is passed to.
Partially resolves https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/67363
Unify the duplicate pattern var checking in
pattern resolution such that it is always called
no matter how we end up type-checking the pattern.
This avoids incorrectly allowing duplicate pattern
vars to compile for patterns as a part of
multi-statement closures.
It's possible for out-of-scope type variable to be the type of
declaration if such declaration is recursively referenced in
the body of a closure located in its initializer expression.
In such cases type of the variable declaration cannot be connected
to the closure because its not known in advance (determined by the
initializer itself).
Resolves: https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/63455
Currently solver picks the first conjunction it can find,
which means - the earliest resolved closure. This is not
always correct because when calls are chained closures
passed to the lower members could be resolved sooner
than the ones higher up but at the same time they depend
on types inferred from members higher in the chain.
Let's make sure that multi-statement closures are always
solved in order they appear in the AST to make sure that
types are available to members lower in the chain.
