* Implement #warning and #error
* Fix #warning/#error in switch statements
* Fix AST printing for #warning/#error
* Add to test case
* Add extra handling to ParseDeclPoundDiagnostic
* fix dumping
* Consume the right paren even in the failure case
* Diagnose extra tokens on the same line after a diagnostic directive
This has three principal advantages:
- It gives some additional type-safety when working
with known accessors.
- It makes it significantly easier to test whether a declaration
is an accessor and encourages the use of a common idiom.
- It saves a small amount of memory in both FuncDecl and its
serialized form.
* Simplify TupleTypeRepr parsing
This patch introduces a TupleTypeReprElement struct that holds the
locations for all relevant bits of tuple elements. It removes the
NameLoc and UnderscoreLoc arrays from TupleTypeReprElement in favor of
holding each of these on TupleTypeReprElement. These extra bits of info
are required for full-fidelity representation in the Syntax library.
* Remove TupleTypeReprBitfields and move EllipsisLoc out of TrailingObjects
* Update users of TupleTypeRepr
* Don't resize the elts if we're going to push_back
* getType -> getElementType
* Move ellipsis back into TrailingObjects.
* Move NumElements into TupleTypeReprBitfields
It's particularly likely someone will try to type `\(foo)`, which looks like a string interpolation segment, outside of a string literal, so give that case a special diagnostic. Fixes rdar://problem/32315365.
Resolves: https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4426
* Make IfConfigDecl be able to hold ASTNodes
* Parse #if as IfConfigDecl
* Stop enclosing toplevel #if into TopLevelCodeDecl.
* Eliminate IfConfigStmt
As such, we no longer insert two placeholders for initializers that
need two vtable slots; instead we record that in the
MissingMemberDecl. I can see MissingMemberDecl growing to be something
we'd actually show to users, that can be used for other kinds of
declarations that don't have vtable entries, but for now I'm not going
to worry about any of that.
Replace `NameOfType foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)` with DRY version `auto foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)`.
The DRY auto version is by far the dominant form already used in the repo, so this PR merely brings the exceptional cases (redundant repetition form) in line with the dominant form (auto form).
See the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#es11-use-auto-to-avoid-redundant-repetition-of-type-names) for a general discussion on why to use `auto` to avoid redundant repetition of type names.
This introduces a few unfortunate things because the syntax is awkward.
In particular, the period and following token in \.[a], \.? and \.! are
token sequences that don't appear anywhere else in Swift, and so need
special handling. This is somewhat compounded by \foo.bar.baz possibly
being \(foo).bar.baz or \(foo.bar).baz (parens around the type), and,
furthermore, needing to distinguish \Foo?.bar from \Foo.?bar.
rdar://problem/31724243
Storing this separately is unnecessary since we already
serialize the enum element's interface type. Also, this
eliminates one of the few remaining cases where we serialize
archetypes during AST serialization.
This commit introduces new kind of requirements: layout requirements.
This kind of requirements allows to expose that a type should satisfy certain layout properties, e.g. it should be a trivial type, have a given size and alignment, etc.
Also rename ASTWalker::shouldWalkIntoFunctionGenericParams() to shouldWalkIntoGenericParams() since it's now used when walking NominalTypeDecl (not just AbstractFunctionDecl).
withoutActuallyEscaping has a signature like `<T..., U, V, W> (@nonescaping (T...) throws<U> -> V, (@escaping (T...) throws<U> -> V) -> W) -> W, but our type system for functions unfortunately isn't quite that expressive yet, so we need to special-case it. Set up the necessary type system when resolving an overload set to reference withoutActuallyEscaping, and if a type check succeeds, build a MakeTemporarilyEscapableExpr to represent it in the type-checked AST.
Use a syntax that declares the layout's generic parameters and fields,
followed by the generic arguments to apply to the layout:
{ var Int, let String } // A concrete box layout with a mutable Int
// and immutable String field
<T, U> { var T, let U } <Int, String> // A generic box layout,
// applied to Int and String
// arguments
And make it be able to composite any TypeReprs.
Although Swift doesn't support composition of arbitrary types, AST
should be able to hold any TypeReprs, to represent syntax as accurate as
possible.
