Currently, the check for whether to serialize parseable interface
arguments doesn't handle the case where a supplementary output file map
is used, preferring only to check if the frontend is passed
`-emit*interface`. Instead, check if the frontend inputs and outputs
contains a parseable interface, and use that to determine if we need to
save args.
This also puts `-module-link-name` in the parseable interface arg list.
Commit to a command line option spelling so that build systems can
start testing it. I deliberately picked one of the longer names we
were considering because we can always decide to add a shorter alias,
but can't decide a shorter name was too generic.
Like the other supplementary output flags,
-emit-parseable-module-interface-path will emit a .swiftinterface file
to a particular path, while -emit-parseable-module-interface will put
it next to the main output (the one specified with -o).
rdar://problem/43776945
We already have something called "module interfaces" -- it's the
generated interface view that you can see in Xcode, the interface
that's meant for developers using a library. Of course, that's also a
textual format. To reduce confusion, rename the new module stability
feature to "parseable [module] interfaces".
...instead of sometimes hardcoding them and sometimes using Strings.h.
The exceptions are the libraries that sit below Frontend; these can
continue using strings.
...but don't hook it up to anything yet.
This is the very very start of the module stability / textual
interfaces feature described at
https://forums.swift.org/t/plan-for-module-stability/14551/
For now I've just made it a frontend option (not a driver option),
which is good enough for testing.
This means moving the output path into SupplementaryOutputPaths, and
using the same sort of diagnostic dispatching that serialized
diagnostics use. This is part of what's needed to run the migrator
in batch mode.
