Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hamish Knight
4946c799af [AST] Remove ModuleDecl::addFile
Rather than exposing an `addFile` member on
ModuleDecl, have the `create` members take a
lambda that populates the files for the module.
Once module construction has finished, the files
are immutable.
2024-11-17 14:17:20 +00:00
Hamish Knight
309c02410b [IDE] Avoid relying on after-the-fact use of addFile
We shouldn't be attempting to append SourceFiles
to the module after-the-fact for syntactic macro
expansion, refactor things such that the SourceFile
is created alongside the ModuleDecl.
2024-11-17 14:17:20 +00:00
Meghana Gupta
1985b6cceb [NFC] Add SerializationOptions to ASTContext 2024-10-31 13:40:56 -07:00
Doug Gregor
49aa0e966f Ensure that SourceFiles always have a backing buffer in the SourceManager
The "buffer ID" in a SourceFile, which is used to find the source file's
contents in the SourceManager, has always been optional. However, the
effectively every SourceFile actually does have a buffer ID, and the
vast majority of accesses to this information dereference the optional
without checking.

Update the handful of call sites that provided `nullopt` as the buffer
ID to provide a proper buffer instead. These were mostly unit tests
and testing programs, with a few places that passed a never-empty
optional through to the SourceFile constructor.

Then, remove optionality from the representation and accessors. It is
now the case that every SourceFile has a buffer ID, simplying a bunch
of code.
2024-09-16 21:46:42 -07:00
Tim Kientzle
1d961ba22d Add #include "swift/Basic/Assertions.h" to a lot of source files
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
2024-06-05 19:37:30 -07:00
Ben Barham
ef8825bfe6 Migrate llvm::Optional to std::optional
LLVM has removed llvm::Optional, move over to std::optional. Also
clang-format to fix up all the renamed #includes.
2024-02-21 11:20:06 -08:00
Steven Wu
3986937e03 [Caching][NFC] Restructure CASOption in swift. NFC
Clean up how CASOptions are kept and passed inside swift to make the
code more readable. Also avoid a copy of CAS configuration in
ClangImporter.
2024-02-11 14:08:09 -08:00
Hamish Knight
16cfca4186 [ASTWalker] NFC: Rename SkipChildren -> SkipNode
This better describes what the action currently
does, and allows us to re-introduce `SkipChildren`
with the correct behavior.
2024-02-05 15:27:25 +00:00
Doug Gregor
36a2dcd927 Implement function body macros
Function body macros allow one to introduce a function body for a
particular function, either providing a body for a function that
doesn't have one, or wholesale replacing the body of a function that
was written with a new one.
2023-11-27 17:04:55 -08:00
Holly Borla
c867c7c917 [Macros] Allow extension macros to specify conformances in the attached
attribute.
2023-06-28 00:42:23 -07:00
Holly Borla
725374e0d8 [Macros] Implement attached extension macros. 2023-06-27 21:22:12 -07:00
Evan Wilde
250082df25 [NFC] Reformat all the LLVMs
Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
2023-06-27 09:03:52 -07:00
Evan Wilde
f3ff561c6f [NFC] add llvm namespace to Optional and None
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
                     bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".

I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
2023-06-27 09:03:52 -07:00
Doug Gregor
3c04cff8dd [Macros] Provide the freestanding macro role for expansion operations.
The compiler knows (from a macro declaration) what freestanding macro
role a macro implementation is expected to implement. Pass that through
to the macro expansion code itself, rather than guessing based on the
protocol conformances of the implementation type. We already use this
approach with attached macros, so this is more of the same.

Eliminates a crash and improves diagnostics when the freestanding macro
role and its implementation are out of sync, fixing rdar://110418969.
2023-06-09 12:59:56 -07:00
Rintaro Ishizaki
c3d1304345 [SourceKit] Add request to expand macros syntactically
Expand macros in the specified source file syntactically (without any
module imports, nor typechecking).

Request would look like:
```
{
  key.compilerargs: [...]
  key.sourcefile: <file name>
  key.sourcetext: <source text> (optional)
  key.expansions: [<expansion specifier>...]
}
```
`key.compilerargs` are used for getting plugins search paths. If
`key.sourcetext` is not specified, it's loaded from the file system.
Each `<expansion sepecifier>` is
```
{
  key.offset: <offset>
  key.modulename: <plugin module name>
  key.typename: <macro typename>
  key.macro_roles: [<macro role UID>...]
}
```
Clients have to provide the module and type names because that's
semantic.

Response is a `CategorizedEdits` just like (semantic) "ExpandMacro"
refactoring. But without `key.buffer_name`. Nested expnasions are not
supported at this point.
2023-06-07 14:26:40 -07:00