This generalization enables curried functions with generic parameters coming from the initial declaration to be printed with the archetype's upperbound rather than '_' unresolved type.
As an added benefit, T.self and T.Type for generic parameters now get shown as the upperbound of the generic parameter provided
With the unqualified fallback we start to hit this assertion for
`return nil` in failable intializers. We ought to be able to just
skip over literal buckets though.
`getType` here can return a null type if the queried expression isn't
part of the solution, which can currently happen for code completion.
I'm working on a more principled fix for this, but until then this is
a low-risk fix that will unblock the stress tester and can be
cherry-picked to 6.2.
rdar://149759542
The logic here for completion wasn't actually
helping things since it would result in adding the
var overload to the system, which would result
in an ErrorType binding. We could turn the ErrorType
into a placeholder when resolving the overload,
but the simpler solution is to just allow CSGen
to turn the reference into a PlaceholderType. This
matches what we do for regular solving, and fixes
a crash with an IUO completion.
rdar://89369091
This prevents a nullptr dereference in `ASTScope::unqualifiedLookup()` after
querying for the `SourceFile` containing a give source location.
Fixes rdar://137652856 and https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/76944.
We do iterate into extern C declarations when building the Swift lookup table during PCH generation.
0fad799f51/lib/ClangImporter/SwiftLookupTable.cpp (L2140-L2146)
However, we don’t import `extern "C"` declarations while parsing the bridging header (eg. when no `-pch-output-dir` is specified during code completion). This caused us to miss functions annotated as `extern "C"` in code completion.
rdar://127512985
That way, when the request gets truncated by os_log in sourcekit-lsp, we see most of the request. Most likely the sourcetext and the compiler args wouldn't have made it into the log message completely anyway.
rdar://121322828
When completing in cases like `bar(arg: foo(|, option: 1)`, we don’t know if `option` belongs to the call to `foo` or `bar`. Be defensive and also suggest the signature.
This removes the distinction between argument completions and postfix expr paren completions, which was meaningless since solver-based completion.
It then determines whether to suggest the entire function call pattern (with all argument labels) or only a single argument based on whether there are any existing arguments in the call.
For this to work properly, we need to improve parser recovery a little bit so that it parsers arguments after the code completion token properly.
This should make call pattern heuristics obsolete.
rdar://84809503
ASTGen always builds with the host Swift compiler, without requiring
bootstrapping, and is enabled in more places. Move the regex literal
parsing logic there so it is enabled in more host environments, and
makes use of CMake's Swift support. Enable all of the regex literal
tests when ASTGen is built, to ensure everything is working.
Remove the "AST" and "Parse" Swift modules from SwiftCompilerSources,
because they are no longer needed.
Previously we were using the same set of conditions
for serializing as for swiftdoc, so excluded them.
However it's reasonable to have them in the
swiftsourceinfo.
Only return macros that are valid in their current position, ie. an
attached macro is not valid on a nominal.
Also return freestanding expression macros in code block item position
and handle the new freestanding code item macros.
Resolves rdar://105563583.
Introduce SingleValueStmtExpr, which allows the
embedding of a statement in an expression context.
This then allows us to parse and type-check `if`
and `switch` statements as expressions, gated
behind the `IfSwitchExpression` experimental
feature for now. In the future,
SingleValueStmtExpr could also be used for e.g
`do` expressions.
For now, only single expression branches are
supported for producing a value from an
`if`/`switch` expression, and each branch is
type-checked independently. A multi-statement
branch may only appear if it ends with a `throw`,
and it may not `break`, `continue`, or `return`.
The placement of `if`/`switch` expressions is also
currently limited by a syntactic use diagnostic.
Currently they're only allowed in bindings,
assignments, throws, and returns. But this could
be lifted in the future if desired.