The spelling kind was only ever set to
`StaticSpellingKind::None`, and the static location
was never used for anything (and should be queried
on the storage anyway). This doesn't affect the
computation of `isStatic` since `IsStaticRequest`
already takes the static-ness from the storage for
accessors.
This accidentally started happening when I adjusted getEffectiveAccess to return `Public` for `Package` declarations in #69709. As a result, the optimizer thought it had more opportunities to go after declarations that used to be opaque. Unfortunately, this resulted in a miscompile as the devirtualizer was able to look through now-serialized package (static) functions. In one specific instance, the optimizer created direct calls to hidden accessors instead of going through the dispatch thunk.
Function body macros allow one to introduce a function body for a
particular function, either providing a body for a function that
doesn't have one, or wholesale replacing the body of a function that
was written with a new one.
The "typechecked function body" request was defined to type-check a
function body that is known to be present, and not skipped, and would
assert these conditions, requiring its users to check whether a body
was expected. Often, this means that callers would use `getBody()`
instead, which retrieves the underlying value in whatever form it
happens to be, and assume it has been mutated appropriately.
Make the "typechecked function body" request, triggered by
`getTypecheckedBody()`, more resilient and central. A `NULL` result is
now acceptable, signifying that there is no body. Clients will need to
tolerate NULL results.
* When there is no body but should be one, produce an appropriate
error.
* When there shouldn't be a body but is, produce an appropriate error
* Handle skipping of function bodies here, rather than elsewhere.
Over time, we should move clients off of `getBody` and `hasBody`
entirely, and toward `getTypecheckedBody` or some yet-to-be-introduced
forms like `getBodyAsWritten` for the pre-typechecked body.
As a follow up to https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/69841, clarify the
possible states that initializer expression of a pattern can be in. The
possible states are not checked, checked, and "checked and contextualized"
(which is the new state that was introduced and requestified in the previous
PR). This refactoring encodes the states more explicitly and renames a few
compiler APIs to better align with the new naming. NFC.
Allow initializer expressions to be emitted during SILGen when
`-experimental-lazy-typecheck` is specified by introducing a new request that
fully typechecks the init expressions of pattern binding declarations
on-demand.
There are still a few rough edges, like missing support for wrapped properties
and incomplete handling of subsumed initializers. Fixing these issues is not an
immediate priority because in the short term `-experimental-lazy-typecheck`
will always be accompanied by `-enable-library-evolution` and
`-experimental-skip-non-exportable-decls`. This means that only the
initializers of properties on `@frozen` types will need to be emitted and
property wrappers are not yet fully supported on properties belonging to
`@frozen` types.
Resolves rdar://117448868
Introduce a request that computes the unique underlying type substitution of an
opaque type declaration. This ensures that the type substitution is available
on-demand when generating SIL in lazy typechecking mode.
Resolves rdar://117439760
When retrieving the full list of semantic attributes for printing, trigger the
HasStorage request to add an implicit `@_hasStorage` attribute if necessary.
Resolves rdar://117768816
To match terminology used elsewhere in the compiler (e.g. "parsed accessor")
rename "original attributes" to "parsed atributes". Additionally, make sure the
attributes returned by `getParsedAttrs()` really are just the parsed ones by
skipping implicit attributes in addition to the ones expanded from macros.
A client shouldn't know about the underlying type of an opaque type
unless it can see the body of the naming decl. Attempting to read it can
lead to accessing a hidden dependency and a compiler crash.
This was protected by a check specific to function decls but var decls
and subscripts were not handled. To support them we have to move this
logic to the writer side where we have access to the full
AbstractStorageDecl and write in the swifmodule whether the underlying
type should be visible outside of the module.
rdar://117607906
We need to avoid triggering semantic attribute requests in TypeCheckAttr
because it happens too early in type checking to trigger some semantic
attribute requests, and we only want to diagnose attributes that were written
in source anyways.
In order to avoid triggering request cycles as `SemanticDeclAttrsRequest` grows
to cover a larger range of implicit attributes, we need a lighter-weight
accessor for just the CustomAttrs that have been expanded from macros.
Introduce `getSemanticCustomAttrs()` and adopt it where `getSemanticAttrs()`
had been previously used to enumerate macro expanded custom attributes.
Conflicts:
- `lib/AST/TypeCheckRequests.cpp` renamed `isMoveOnly` which requires
a static_cast on rebranch because `Optional` is now a `std::optional`.
This implementation has the function execute a request to scan the
inheritance clause of non-protocol nominals for a `~Copyable`. For
protocols, we look in the requirement signature.
This isn't our final state, as the GenericEnvironment needs to be
queried in general to determine of a Type is noncopyable. So for now
checking for a `~Copyable` only makes sense for Decls.
I've renamed the method to `TypeDecl::isNoncopyable`, because the query
doesn't make sense for many other kinds of `ValueDecl`'s beyond the
`TypeDecl`'s. In fact, it looks like no one was relying on that anyway.
Thus, we now have a distinction where in Sema, you ask whether
a `Type` or `TypeDecl` is "Noncopyable". But within SIL, we still
preserve the notion of "move-only" since there is additionally the
move-only type wrapper for types that otherwise support copying.
