These search paths will not get used during Swift module compilation and can only hinder module sharing among different targets.
Resolves rdar://119217774
- Remove `std::` from `std::size_t` where we're importing `stddef.h`
instead of `cstddef`.
- Add an inclusion of `<cstdlib>` where needed because libc++ has
cleaned up some of their transitive inclusions.
Previously I avoided doing this since the only problem would be that in a case
where we had two transfer instructions that were in an if-else block, we would
just emit an error for one:
```swift
if boolValue {
transfer(x)
} else {
transfer(x) // Only emit error for this transfer!
}
useValue(x)
```
Now that we are tracking at the transfer point if any element in the transfer
was captured in a closure, this becomes an actual semantic issue since if we
track the transfer instruction that isn't reachable from the closure capture, we
will not become more pessimistic:
```swift
if boolValue {
closure = { useInOut(&x) }
transfer(x)
} else {
transfer(x)
}
// Since we grab from the else block, sendableField is allowed to be accessed
// since we do not track that x was captured by reference in a closure.
x.sendableField
useValue(x)
```
To be truly safe, we need to emit both errors.
rdar://119048779
This allows one to place types like PointerIntPair and value types that wrap a
pointer into the pointer set.
I am making this change before I use this data structure in TransferNonSendable
and using ARC to validate that I haven't broken anything.
ASTScope assertions that a new child node inserted into its parent list
is after all other child nodes in the source, which included some bespoke
code for dealing with macro expansions. Replace this bespoke code with
uses of the newer SourceManager operations that check ordering of
source locations in a manner that respects macro expansions.
SourceManager's `isBeforeInBuffer` in buffer takes two source locations
that are assumed to be within the same source buffer and determines
whether the first precedes the second. However, due to macro
expansion, there can be source locations in different source buffers
that are nonetheless conceptually part of the same source file. For
such cases, `isBeforeInBuffer` will silently produce wrong results.
Extend `SourceManager` with a new `isBefore` operation that determines
whether one source location precedes another in the same conceptual
source file, even if they are in different source buffers that (e.g.)
represent macro expansions within that source file. Also introduce
`isAtOrBefore` to cover the case where the source locations might be
equivalent, which was previously handled via a separate equality check
on the source locations that won't work with macro expansions.
Add caching for the list of accessors of a buffer, so we aren't doing
a full walk up the source-buffer chain ever time we do a comparison of
source locations. LCA is still linear-time, but this eliminates
extraneous hash table lookups along the way.
Over time, we should both move more clients over to these new variants
and introduce more assertions into the old (in-buffer) versions to
catch improper uses of them.
Function body macros allow one to introduce a function body for a
particular function, either providing a body for a function that
doesn't have one, or wholesale replacing the body of a function that
was written with a new one.
Yet more preprocessor metaprogramming to eliminate per-macro-role boilerplate
in the compiler. This time, focused on mangling, demangling, and remangling
of the accessor macro roles.
ASTGen always builds with the host Swift compiler, without requiring
bootstrapping, and is enabled in more places. Move the regex literal
parsing logic there so it is enabled in more host environments, and
makes use of CMake's Swift support. Enable all of the regex literal
tests when ASTGen is built, to ensure everything is working.
Remove the "AST" and "Parse" Swift modules from SwiftCompilerSources,
because they are no longer needed.
Generalize the existing `-playground-high-performance` flag into a set of options that control various aspects of the "playground transformation" in Sema.
This commit adds the first two of those controllable parts of the transform, matching what the existing flag already controls (scope entry/exit and function arguments), but in an extensible way. The intent is for this to be a scalable way to control a larger set of upcoming options.
So instead of a single flag, we represent the playground transform options as a set of well-defined choices, with a new `-playground-option` flag to individually enable or disable those options (when prefixed with "No", the corresponding option is instead disabled). Enabling an already-enabled option or disabling an already-disabled option is a no-op.
For compatibility, the existing `-playground-high-performance` flag causes "expensive" transforms to be disabled, as before. We can also leave it as a useful shorthand to include or exclude new options even in the future, based on their cost. There is a comment on the old function indicating that new code should use the more general form, but it remains for clients like LLDB until they can switch over.
The machinery for implementing the playground options is similar to how `Features.def` works, with a new `PlaygroundOptions.def` that defines the supported playground transform options. Each playground definition specifies the name and description, as well as whether the option is enabled by default, and whether it's also enabled in the "high performance" case.
Adding a new option in the future only requires adding it to `PlaygroundOptions.def`, deciding whether it should be on or off by default, deciding whether it should also be on or off in `-playground-high-performance` mode, and checking for its presence from the appropriate places in `PlaygroundTransform.cpp`.
Note that this is intended to control the types of user-visible results that the invoker of the compiler wants, from an externally detectable standpoint. Other flags, such as whether or not to use the extended form of the callbacks, remain as experimental features, since those deal with the mechanics and not the desired observed behavior.
rdar://109911673
There's no reason to generate only TypeRepr using ASTGen anymore.
Use ParserASTGen feature to test test/ASTGen/types.swift because
ASTGen now can generate the whole test file for type checking.
Add a new flag to enable package interface loading.
Use the last value of package-name in case of dupes.
Rename PrintInterfaceContentMode as InterfaceMode.
Update diagnostics.
Test package interface loading with various scenarios.
Test duplicate package-name.
It has an extension .package.swiftinterface and contains package decls
as well as SPIs and public/inlinable decls. When a module is loaded
from interface, it now looks up the package-name in the interface
and checks if the importer is in the same package. If so, it uses
that package interface found to load the module. If not, uses the existing
logic to load modules.
Resolves rdar://104617854
