The old analysis pass doesn't take into account profile data, nor does
it consider post-dominance. It primarily dealt with _fastPath/_slowPath.
A block that is dominated by a cold block is itself cold. That's true
whether it's forwards or backwards dominance.
We can also consider a call to any `Never` returning function as a
cold-exit, though the block(s) leading up to that call may be executed
frequently because of concurrency. For now, I'm ignoring the concurrency
case and assuming it's cold. To make use of this "no return" prediction,
use the `-enable-noreturn-prediction` flag, which is currently off by
default.
Adds sections `__TEXT,__swift_as_entry`, and `__TEXT,__swift_as_ret` that
contain relative pointers to async functlets modelling async function entries,
and function returns, respectively.
Emission of the sections can be trigger with the frontend option
`-Xfrontend -enable-async-frame-push-pop-metadata`.
This is done by:
* IRGen adding a `async_entry` function attribute to async functions.
* LLVM's coroutine splitting identifying continuation funclets that
model the return from an async function call by adding the function
attribute `async_ret`. (see #llvm-project/pull/9204)
* An LLVM pass that keys off these two function attribute and emits the
metadata into the above mention sections.
rdar://134460666
This flag will be used to have the driver print out all possible paths to the argument dependency module name. `-explain-module-dependency` will print the first discovered such path, in order to produce an answer sooner.
As-is, this default interferes with the incremental build machinery which conservatively assumes that binary module dependencies must cause dependents to be re-built.
This is necessary to ensure that availability checks contained in inlined
functions are compiled correctly for zippered modules when built from
interface.
Resolves rdar://130094532.
This introduces a secondary flag `-sysroot` for the non-Darwin targets,
primarily Unicies. The intention here is to support a split `-sdk`,
`-sysroot` model where the `-sdk` parameter provides the Swift "SDK"
which augments the native platform's C sysroot which is indicated as
`-sysroot`. For the case of Android, this would allow us to provide a
path to the NDK sysroot and the Swift SDK allowing us to cross-compile
Android binaries from Windows.
Having package-name flag in non-package interfaces causes them to be built as if
belonging to a package, which causes an issue for a loading client outside of the
package as follows.
For example, when building X that depends on A with the following dependency chain:
X --> A --> B --(package-only)--> C
1. X itself is not in the same package as A, B, and C.
2. When dependency scanning X, and opening up B, because the scan target is in a
different package domain, the scanner decides that B's package-only dependency
on C is to be ignored.
3. When then finally building A itself, it will load its dependencies, but because
the .private.swiftinterface of A still specifies -package-name, when it loads
B, it will then examine its dependencies and deem that this package-only dependency
on C is required.
Because (2) and (3) disagree, we get an error now when building the private A textual interface.
rdar://130701866
Now that API descriptions are emitted during module build jobs when
`-emit-api-descriptor-path` is specified and the build system has been updated
to pass that flag when the output is needed, the `swift-api-extract` frontend
alias is no longer used. Delete it and the tests that were specific to invoking
`swift-api-extract`.
Resolves rdar://116537394.
Out of an abundance of caution, we:
1. Left in parsing support for transferring but internally made it rely on the
internals of sending.
2. Added a warning to tell people that transferring was going to
be removed very soon.
Now that we have given people some time, remove support for parsing
transferring.
rdar://130253724
Separate swift-syntax libs for the compiler and for the library plugins.
Compiler communicates with library plugins using serialized messages
just like executable plugins.
* `lib/swift/host/compiler/lib_Compiler*.dylib`(`lib/CompilerSwiftSyntax`):
swift-syntax libraries for compiler. Library evolution is disabled.
* Compiler (`ASTGen` and `swiftIDEUtilsBridging`) only depends on
`lib/swift/host/compiler` libraries.
* `SwiftInProcPluginServer`: In-process plugin server shared library.
This has one `swift_inproc_plugins_handle_message` entry point that
receives a message and return the response.
* In the compiler
* Add `-in-process-plugin-server-path` front-end option, which specifies
the `SwiftInProcPluginServer` shared library path.
* Remove `LoadedLibraryPlugin`, because all library plugins are managed
by `SwiftInProcPluginServer`
* Introduce abstract `CompilerPlugin` class that has 2 subclasses:
* `LoadedExecutablePlugin` existing class that represents an
executable plugin
* `InProcessPlugins` wraps `dlopen`ed `SwiftInProcPluginServer`
* Unified the code path in `TypeCheckMacros.cpp` and `ASTGen`, the
difference between executable plugins and library plugins are now
abstracted by `CompilerPlugin`
