Previously this flag was only used to pass explicit dependencies to compilation tasks. This change adds support for the dependency scanner to also consider these inputs when resolving dependencies.
Resolves https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-driver/issues/1951
When querying a Swift module, the scanner now also keeps track of all discovered candidate binary modules which are not compatible with current compilation.
- If a Swift dependency is successfully resolved to a compatible binary module or a textual interface, a warning is emitted for every incompatible binary Swift module discovered along the way.
- If a Swift dependency is not resolved, but incompatible module candidates were found, an error is emitted - while it is likely that the scan would fail downstream, it is also possible that an underlying Clang module dependency (with the same name) is successfuly resolved and the Swift lookup failure is ignored, which is still going to lead to failures most of the time if the client code assumes the presence of the Swift overlay module in this scenario.
This change refactors common error reporting by the scanner into a 'ModuleDependencyIssueReporter' class, which also keeps track of all diagnosed failed lookups to avoid repeating diagnostics.
- 'SwiftModuleScanner' will now be owned directly by the 'ModuleDependencyScanningWorker' and will contain all the necessary custom logic, instead of being instantiated by the module interface loader for each query
- Moves ownership over module output path and sdk module output path directly into the scanning worker, instead of the cache
This was used a long time ago for a design of a scanner which could rely on the client to specify that some modules *will be* present at a given location but are not yet during the scan. We have long ago determined that the scanner must have all modules available to it at the time of scan for soundness. This code has been stale for a couple of years and it is time to simplify things a bit by deleting it.
With '-sdk-module-cache-path', Swift textual interfaces found in the SDK will be built into a separate SDK-specific module cache.
Clang modules are not yet affected by this change, pending addition of the required API.
Teach scanner to pick and choose binary modules correctly based on if it
is testable import or not. Some situations that scanner need to be
careful when testable is involved:
* When it is a regular import, it should not import binary modules that
are built with -enable-testing, it should prefer interfaces if that is
available.
* When testable import, it should only load binary module and it should
make sure the internal imports from binary modules are actually
required for testable import to work.
If a testable import only find a regular binary module, dependency
scanner currently will just preceed with such module and leave the
diagnostics to swift-frontend, because the alternative (failed to find
module) can be confusing to users.
rdar://125914165
Add support for cross import modules by ingesting swiftoverlay files for
the cross import into CAS file system.
The long-term better fix will be just passing the cross import
information from scanner to swift-frontend so frontend doesn't need to
read overlay files again to figure out the cross import module.
rdar://123839248
Always prefer binary module when using @testable imports because the
swiftmodule rebuilt from interface cannot be imported as testable.
rdar://123120159
'ModuleDependencyScanner' maintains a Thread Pool along with a pool of workers
which are capable of executing a filesystem lookup of a named module dependency.
When resolving imports of a given Swift module, each import's resolution
operation can be issued asunchronously.
