Introduce Pattern subclasses for the 'is T', 'T(<pattern>)', and '<expr>' pattern syntaxes we'll be introducing for pattern-matching "switch" statements. Also add an 'UnresolvedCalLPattern' to act as an intermediate for name lookup to resolve to a nominal type, oneof element, or function call expression pattern. Since we'll need to be able to rewrite patterns like we do expressions, add setters to AST nodes that contain references to subpatterns. Implement some basic walking logic in places we search patterns for var decls, but punt on any more complex type-checking or SILGen derived from these nodes until we actually use them.
Swift SVN r5780
Sub-patterns are now considered part of the enclosing pattern, so if the
parent pattern pointer is const, the child pointer will be too.
I changed the minimal number of files to make this work, but future code
should use "const Pattern *" when intended, and "Pattern *" only if they
intend to modify the pattern.
Swift SVN r5743
Change AssignStmt into AssignExpr; this will make assignment behave more consistently with assignment-like operators, and is a first step toward integrating '=' parsing with SequenceExpr resolution so that '=' can obey precedence rules. This also nicely simplifies the AST representation of c-style ForStmts; the initializer and increment need only be Expr* instead of awkward Expr*/AssignStmt* unions.
This doesn't actually change any user-visible behavior yet; AssignExpr is still only parsed at statement scope, and typeCheckAssignment is still segregrated from the constraint checker at large. (In particular, a PipeClosureExpr containing a single assign expr in its body still doesn't use the assign expr to resolve its own type.) The parsing issue will be addressed by handling '=' during SequenceExpr resolution. typeCheckAssignment can hopefully be reworked to work within the constraint checker too.
Swift SVN r5500
We will handle Swift-function-to-ObjC-block bridging in SILGen as part of general Cocoa-to-Swift type bridging. Temporarily disable building swiftAppKit and tests that exercise block bridging until the new implementation lands.
Swift SVN r5090
Most of this is mechanical, because we weren't actually relying on
byref(heap) for anything. Simplify capture analysis, now that the only
way a variable can have non-fixed lifetime is if it is actually
captured. Fixes <rdar://problem/11247831>.
Swift SVN r5046
This nests top level PatternBindingDecls (in "main modules") under TopLevelCodeDecls,
instead of having them live in a translation unit. They contain code that is executed,
so they should be in a TLCD.
Swift SVN r4668
Create a new FallthroughStmt, which transfers control from a 'case' or 'default' block to the next 'case' or 'default' block within a switch. Implement parsing and sema for FallthroughStmt, which syntactically consists of a single 'fallthrough' keyword. Sema verifies that 'fallthrough' actually appears inside a switch statement and that there is a following case or default block to pass control to.
SILGen/IRGen support forthcoming.
Swift SVN r4653
During name binding, associate func decls with operator decls. When parsing SequenceExprs, look up operator decls to determine associativity and precedence of infix operators. Remove the infix_left and infix_left attributes, and make the infix attribute a simple declared attribute [infix] with no precedence.
Operator decls are resolved as follows:
- If an operator is declared in the same module as the use, resolve to the declaration in the current module.
- Otherwise, import operator declarations from all imported modules. If more than one declaration is imported for the operator and they conflict, raise an ambiguity error. If they are equivalent, pick one arbitrarily.
This allows operator declarations within the current module to override imported declarations if desired or to disambiguate conflicting operator declarations.
I've updated the standard library and the tests. stdlib2 and some of the examples still need to be updated.
Swift SVN r4629
Unfortunately, this regresses the repl when expressions like (1,2) are entered. This is because the repl is violating some invariants (forming dags out of ASTs, making ASDAG's which upset the type checker). I'm going to fix this next, but can't bring myself to do it in the same commit.
Swift SVN r4617
At the top level, if 'operator' is followed by 'infix', 'prefix', or 'postfix', consider it a contextual keyword, and parse an operator decl following it that looks like:
operator {infix|postfix|prefix} <+> {
attributes…
}
Prefix and postfix operator decls currently admit no attributes. Infix operators have 'associativity {left|right|none}' and 'precedence <int>' attributes.
This patch implements parsing for operator declarations but does not yet attach the declared attributes to func decls for the operators.
Swift SVN r4596
Implement switch statements with simple value comparison to get the drudge work of parsing and generating switches in place. Cases are checked using a '=~' operator to compare the subject of the switch to the value in the case. Unlike a C switch, cases each have their own scope and don't fall through. 'break' and 'continue' apply to an outer loop rather to the switch itself. Multiple case values can be specified in a comma-separated list, as in 'case 1, 2, 3, 4:'. Currently no effort is made to check for duplicate cases or to rank cases by match strength; cases are just checked in source order, and the first one wins (aside from 'default', which is branched to if all cases fail).
Swift SVN r4359
The ClangImporter doesn't synthesize PatternBindingDecls around imported struct fields, but the ASTPrinter assumes that a non-property VarDecl will later show up in a PatternBindingDecl. In the ASTPrinter, don't skip VarDecls that originated from Clang.
Swift SVN r3925
We have no intention of ever supporting actual semicolon statements
(separators, statements no), nor do we ever want to because that would
mean the behavior of the program would potentially change if semicolons
were naively removed.
This patch tracks the trailing semicolon now in the decl/expr/stmt,
which will enable someone to write a good "swift indent" tool in the
future.
Swift SVN r3824
By splitting out the expression used to allocate 'this' (which exists
in the AST but cannot be written in the Swift language proper), we
make it possible to emit non-allocating constructors for imported
Objective-C classes, which are the only classes that have an
allocate-this expression.
Swift SVN r3558
Note: this is an experiment.
When we're asked to render a diagnostic for a declaration that does
not have source information, pretty-print the declaration into a
buffer and synthesize a location pointing into that buffer. This gives
the illusion of Clang-style diagnostics where we have all of the
source headers, but without actually requiring that source location
information. It may prove useful or infuriating, but at the very least
it might help us understand how the importer works. Example:
cfuncs_diags.swift:14:7: error: no candidates found for call
exit(5)
~~~~^~~
cfuncs_diags.swift:6:6: note: found this candidate
func exit(_ : Float) {}
^
cfuncs.exit:1:6: note: found this candidate
func exit(_ : CInt)
^
Swift SVN r3434
