Fix a bug that when the last argument is removed as macro search
options, the iterator increment afterwards is going to bring it pass the
end of the container.
rdar://135366279
When scanning swift modules and constructing their build commands, there
is no need to pass any external plugin search paths if there are no macro
dependencies for the module.
rdar://135221984
This makes sure that Swift respects `-Xcc -stdlib=libc++` flags.
Clang already has existing logic to discover the system-wide libc++ installation on Linux. We rely on that logic here.
Importing a Swift module that was built with a different C++ stdlib is not supported and emits an error.
The Cxx module can be imported when compiling with any C++ stdlib. The synthesized conformances, e.g. to CxxRandomAccessCollection also work. However, CxxStdlib currently cannot be imported when compiling with libc++, since on Linux it refers to symbols from libstdc++ which have different mangled names in libc++.
rdar://118357548 / https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/69825
The decision to exclude `-Xcc -D` options from swift module hash
actually doesn't help to solve the problem. It wouldn't reduce the
module variants (or the number of swiftmodule build commands) because
the command-line also encodes all the clang PCM dependencies that do get
affected by `-Xcc` flags.
To avoid the false sharing and the nondeterministic build products,
include most of the `-Xcc` flags, except include search path, into swift
module hash.
rdar://132046247
When dependency scanner construct the overlay file path for the
swift-frontend invocation, make sure the path is remapped if prefix map
is used.
rdar://131940130
Conflicts:
- `test/Interop/Cxx/class/method/methods-this-and-indirect-return-irgen-itanium.swift`
previously fixed on rebranch, now fixed on main (slightly differently).
When the swiftmodule is built with different clang importer arguments,
they can have the same module hash, causing them to be wrongly re-used even
they contains different interfaces. Add ReducedExtraArgs to the module hash to
disambiguate them.
However, some Xcc arguments, most commonly `-D` options do not affect the
swiftmodule being generated. Do not pass `-Xcc -DARGS` to swift
interface compilation to reduce the amount of module variants in the
build.
rdar://131408266
The scanning action does not have any need for handling `-llvm` options, since it will never perform any code-gen. LLVM option processing relies on global option parsing structures, and the scanner has needed to carefully attempt to synchronize access to them. This change guards the configuration of LLVM options to not happen at all for dependency scanning actions, and removes calls to `llvm::cl::ResetAllOptionOccurrences()` that were previously needed.
Resolves rdar://120754696
Fix few issues from previous implementation from explicit module build
with macros and accurate macro dependency scanning in
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/73421.
First, there is a crash when propagating the macro dependencies. It
turns out that the current macro plugin implementation doesn't need the
downstream users to know about the plugin search path from the upstream
dependencies.
Secondly, fix a bug that the swiftinterface that has macro usage won't
build because the build command doesn't inherit the plugin search path
option.
Finally, add JSON output for macro dependencies so it is easier to
debug the macro dependencies.
rdar://131214106
When the dependency scanner picks a pre-built binary module candidate for a given dependency, it needs to be able to attempt to resolve its cross-import overlays relative to the textual interface that the binary module was built from. For example, if a collection of binary modules are located in, and resolved as dependencies from, a pre-built module directory, the scanner must lookup their corresponding cross-import overlays relative to the defining interface as read out from the binary module's MODULE_INTERFACE_PATH. https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/70817 ensures that binary modules serialize the path to their defining textual interface.
Resolves rdar://130778577
Remove `deque` from files it isn't actually used in. Add it and `stack`
to files that it is - presumably they were previously transitively found
through other includes.
Build an accurate macro dependency for swift caching. Specifically, do
not include not used macro plugins into the dependency, which might
cause false negatives for cache hits.
This also builds the foundation for future improvement when dependency
scanning will determine the macro plugin to load and swift-frontend do
not need to redo the work.
rdar://127116512
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
Teach dependency scanner to report all the module canImport check result
to swift-frontend, so swift-frontend doesn't need to parse swiftmodule
or parse TBD file to determine the versions. This ensures dependency
scanner and swift-frontend will have the same resolution for all
canImport checks.
This also fixes two related issues:
* Previously, in order to get consistant results between scanner and
frontend, scanner will request building the module in canImport check
even it is not imported later. This slightly alters the definition of
the canImport to only succeed when the module can be found AND be
built. This also can affect the auto-link in such cases.
* For caching build, the location of the clang module is abstracted away
so swift-frontend cannot locate the TBD file to resolve
underlyingVersion.
rdar://128067152
