Handle call-vs-tuple and subscript-vs-collection-expr disambiguation using the
same "no trivia" rule that we used to disambiguite "unsafe.x" (which we
treat as a member access) from "unsafe .x" (which we treat as an unsafe
expression with a leading-dot member access).
Fixes rdar://146459104.
Introduce a constructor that takes an `llvm::VersionTuple` directly, instead of
needing to spell out `VersionRange::allGTE(<tuple>)` which is unnecessarily
verbose.
Disambiguate `unsafe` in a few more common contexts:
* Before a comma in a list of whatever form
* Before a left brace somewhere that we cannot have a closure
Fixes a few more source compatibility regressions found in the wild,
rdar://146125433.
To pave the way for the new experimental feature which will operate on '@const' attribute and expand the scope of what's currently handled by '_const' without breaking compatibility, for now.
Delay resolution of availability domain identifiers parsed in availability
specifications until type-checking. This allows custom domain specifications to
be written in `if #available` queries.
This will unblock parsing and type-checking availability queries that specify
custom availability domains, e.g.:
```
if #available(CustomDomain) {
// Use declarations protected by @available(CustomDomain)
}
```
With the acceptance of SE-0458, allow the use of unsafe expressions, the
@safe and @unsafe attributes, and the `unsafe` effect on the for..in loop
in all Swift code.
Introduce the `-strict-memory-safety` flag detailed in the proposal to
enable strict memory safety checking. This enables a new class of
feature, an optional feature (that is *not* upcoming or experimental),
and which can be detected via `hasFeature(StrictMemorySafety)`.
Allow a conformance to be "isolated", meaning that it stays in the same
isolation domain as the conforming type. Only allow this for
global-actor-isolated types.
When a conformance is isolated, a nonisolated requirement can be
witnessed by a declaration with the same global actor isolation as the
enclosing type.
The previous algorithm failed to correctly handle the cases where some grouped
`@available` attributes could be marked invalid prior to type checking
attributes.
Memory unsafety in the iteration part of the for-in loop (i.e., the part
that works on the iterator) can be covered by the "unsafe" effect on
the for..in loop, before the pattern.
In order to unblock resolution of availability domains during type-checking
instead of parsing, diagnostics about missing or superfluous wildcards in
availability specification lists need to move to Sema.
It wraps an type-checked `AvailabilitySpec`, which guarantees that the spec has
a valid `AvailabilityDomain` associated with it. This will unblock moving
AvailabilitySpec domain resolution from parsing to sema.
Parse expanded buffer into dedicated syntax.
Also rename `BridgedGeneratedSourceFileKindAttribute` to
`BridgedGeneratedSourceFileKindAttributeFromClang` because C++ decl
(i.e. `GeneratedSourceInfo::Kind::AttributeFromClang`) was renamed a
while ago.
* Collect flag in `ParamDecl::setTypeRepr()`.
* [ASTGen] Separate `BridgedParamDecl.setTypeRepr(_:)` from
`BridgedParamDecl.createParsed(_:)` aligning with C++ API. The majority
of the creations don't set the typerepr.
* Update `ParamSpecifierRequest::evaluate` to handle non-implicit
`ParamDecl` without `TypeRepr` (i.e. untyped closure parameter), instead
of `setSpecifier(::Default)` manually in Parse.
Eventually, querying the `AvailabilityDomain` associated with an
`AvailabilitySpec` will require invoking a request that takes a `DeclContext`.
This means that any diagnostics related to the domain identified by an
`AvailabilitySpec` need to be emitted during type-checking rather than parsing.
This change migrates several `AvailabilitySpec` diagnostics from Parse to Sema
to unblock further work.
Map the lifetime dependencies described in terms of the formal AST-level parameters
to the correct parameter(s) in the lowered SIL function type. There can be 0, 1,
or many SIL parameters per formal parameter because of tuple exploding. Also,
record which dependencies are on addressable parameters (meaning that the dependency
includes not only the value of the parameter, but its specific memory location).
