While the intent behind this functor was noble, it has grown in complexity
considerably over the years, and it seems to be nothing but a source of
crashes in practice. I don't want to deal with it anymore, so I've decided
to just subsume all usages with LookUpConformanceInModule instead.
Specifically, we write a string out like:
sil [isolation "$REPRESENTATION OF ISOLATION"] @function : $@convention(thin) ...
The idea is that by using a string, we avoid parsing issues of the isolation and
have flexibility. I left in the way we put isolation into the comment above
functions so I did not break any tests that rely on it. I also made it so that
we only accept this with sil tests that pass in the flag
"sil-print-function-isolation-info". I am going to for the next release put in a
full real implementation of this that allows for actor isolation to become a
true first class citizen in SIL. But for now this at least lets us write tests
in the short term.
Since this is temporary and behind a flag, I did not add support for
serialization since this is just for writing textual SIL tests.
Since LayoutPrespecialization has been enabled by default in all compiler
invocations for quite some time, it doesn't make sense for it to be treated as
experimental feature. Make it a baseline feature and remove all the
checks for it from the compiler.
C code is highly likely to want to use pointers as references between dependent
structs, and we would like to be able to readily map these to lifetime-dependent
Swift values. Making C types addressable-for-dependencies ensures that any function
producing a dependency on such a value receives a stable in-memory address for that
value, allowing borrows and inout accesses to always be representable as pointers.
rdar://153648393
OSSA lifetime canonicalization can take a very long time in certain
cases in which there are large basic blocks. to mitigate this, add logic
to skip walking the liveness boundary for extending liveness to dead
ends when there aren't any dead ends in the function.
Updates `DeadEndBlocks` with a new `isEmpty` method and cache to
determine if there are any dead-end blocks in a given function.
Ideally we'd be able to use the llvm interleave2 and deinterleave2
intrinsics instead of adding these, but deinterleave currently isn't
available from Swift, and even if you hack that in, the codegen from
LLVM is worse than what shufflevector produces for both x86 and arm. So
in the medium-term we'll use these builtins, and hope to remove them in
favor of [de]interleave2 at some future point.
Every `LowerType::visit*` function eventually calls through to a
`LowerType::handle*` function. After
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/81581, every
`LowerType::handle*` needs to set the `hasPack` flag based on the
passed-in type by calling `mergeHasPack`. Add the missing call in the
`handleAggregateByProperties` function.
rdar://152580661
We currently hit the following errors when attempting to link unit tests:
```
Undefined symbols for architecture arm64:
"swift::ConstExprEvaluator::ConstExprEvaluator(swift::SymbolicValueAllocator&, unsigned int, bool)", referenced from:
BridgedConstExprFunctionState::create() in libswiftSIL.a[63](SILBridging.cpp.o)
"swift::ConstExprEvaluator::~ConstExprEvaluator()", referenced from:
BridgedConstExprFunctionState::deinitialize() in libswiftSIL.a[63](SILBridging.cpp.o)
"swift::ConstExprFunctionState::getConstantValue(swift::SILValue)", referenced from:
BridgedConstExprFunctionState::isConstantValue(BridgedValue) in libswiftSIL.a[63](SILBridging.cpp.o)
"swift::ConstExprFunctionState::ConstExprFunctionState(swift::ConstExprEvaluator&, swift::SILFunction*, swift::SubstitutionMap, unsigned int&, bool)", referenced from:
BridgedConstExprFunctionState::create() in libswiftSIL.a[63](SILBridging.cpp.o)
```
There is an implicit cyclic dependency here between `libswiftSIL` and `libswiftSILOptimizer`, which is okay to have at link time as long as these are static archives and as long as respective archives are specified explicitly on the linker invocation. This change achives that.
Resolves rdar://150944677
NFC *except* that I noticed a bug by inspection where we suppress
`@escaping` when print enum element types. Since this affects
recursive positions, we end up suppressing `@escaping` in places
we shouldn't. This is unlikely to affect much real code, but should
still obviously be fixed.
The new design is a little sketchy in that we're using `const` to
prevent direct use (and allow initialization of `const &` parameters)
but still relying on modification of the actual object. Essentially,
we are treating the `const`-ness of the reference as a promise to leave
the original value in the object after computation rather than a
guarantee of not modifying the object. This is okay --- a temporary
bound to a `const` reference is still a non-`const` object formally
and can be modified without invoking UB --- but makes me a little
uncomfortable.
We are going to need to add more flags to the various checked cast
instructions. Generalize the CastingIsolatedConformances bit in all of
these SIL instructions to an "options" struct that's easier to extend.
Precursor to rdar://152335805.
The PR #81766 introduced some concrete SIMD operations, but
`init(repeating:)` was temporarily disabled due to differentiation
testing break. See:
7a00619065
This PR contains two changes:
1. Define custom derivatives for concrete `init(repeating:)` so we do
not fall into non-differentiability error diagnostic.
2. Add a fix to SIL linker so differentiability witness lookup is done
when the original function has both `@_alwaysEmitIntoClient` and
`@_transparent`. Similar changes were introduced previously in #78908,
but they only handled `@_alwaysEmitIntoClient` without `@_transparent`.
<!--
If this pull request is targeting a release branch, please fill out the
following form:
https://github.com/swiftlang/.github/blob/main/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/release.md?plain=1
Otherwise, replace this comment with a description of your changes and
rationale. Provide links to external references/discussions if
appropriate.
If this pull request resolves any GitHub issues, link them like so:
Resolves <link to issue>, resolves <link to another issue>.
For more information about linking a pull request to an issue, see:
https://docs.github.com/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue
-->
<!--
Before merging this pull request, you must run the Swift continuous
integration tests.
For information about triggering CI builds via @swift-ci, see:
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/main/docs/ContinuousIntegration.md#swift-ci
Thank you for your contribution to Swift!
-->
Initially this declaration is going to be used to determine
per-file default actor isolation i.e. `using @MainActor` and
`using nonisolated` but it could be extended to support other
file-global settings in the future.
When hoisting destroys of aggregates, an attempt is made to fold the
destroys of individual fields into the foregoing instructions. If the
aggregate is noncopyable, this transformation is illegal.
When hoisting destroys of aggregates, an attempt is made to fold the
destroys of individual fields into the foregoing instructions. If the
aggregate is nonescapable, this transformation is illegal.
rdar://152195094
Key paths can't reference non-escapable or non-copyable storage declarations,
so we don't need to refer to them resiliently, and can elide their property
descriptors.
However, declarations may still be conditionally Copyable and Escapable, and
if so, then they still need a property descriptor for resilient key path
references. When a property or subscript can be used in a context where it
is fully Copyable and Escapable, emit the property descriptor in a generic
environment constrained by the necessary conditional constraints.
Fixes rdar://151628396.
Consider an `@_alwaysEmitIntoClient` function and a custom derivative
defined
for it. Previously, such a combination resulted different errors under
different
circumstances.
Sometimes, there were linker errors due to missing derivative function
symbol -
these occurred when we tried to find the derivative in a module, while
it
should have been emitted into client's code (and it did not happen).
Sometimes, there were SIL verification failures like this:
```
SIL verification failed: internal/private function cannot be serialized or serializable: !F->isAnySerialized() || embedded
```
Linkage and serialization options for the derivative were not handled
properly,
and, instead of PublicNonABI linkage, we had Private one which is
unsupported
for serialization - but we need to serialize `@_alwaysEmitIntoClient`
functions
so the client's code is able to see them.
This patch resolves the issue and adds proper handling of custom
derivatives
of `@_alwaysEmitIntoClient` functions. Note that either both the
function and
its custom derivative or none of them should have
`@_alwaysEmitIntoClient`
attribute, mismatch in this attribute is not supported.
The following cases are handled (assume that in each case client's code
uses
the derivative).
1. Both the function and its derivative are defined in a single file in
one module.
2. Both the function and its derivative are defined in different files
which
are compiled to a single module.
3. The function is defined in one module, its derivative is defined in
another
module.
4. The function and the derivative are defined as members of a protocol
extension in two separate modules - one for the function and one for the
derivative. A struct conforming the protocol is defined in the third
module.
5. The function and the derivative are defined as members of a struct
extension in two separate modules - one for the function and one for the
derivative.
The changes allow to define derivatives for methods of `SIMD`.
Fixes#54445
<!--
If this pull request is targeting a release branch, please fill out the
following form:
https://github.com/swiftlang/.github/blob/main/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/release.md?plain=1
Otherwise, replace this comment with a description of your changes and
rationale. Provide links to external references/discussions if
appropriate.
If this pull request resolves any GitHub issues, link them like so:
Resolves <link to issue>, resolves <link to another issue>.
For more information about linking a pull request to an issue, see:
https://docs.github.com/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue
-->
<!--
Before merging this pull request, you must run the Swift continuous
integration tests.
For information about triggering CI builds via @swift-ci, see:
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/main/docs/ContinuousIntegration.md#swift-ci
Thank you for your contribution to Swift!
-->
Implements SE-0460 -- the non-underscored version of @specialized.
It allows to specify "internal" (not abi affecting) specializations.
rdar://150033316
This prevents simplification and SILCombine passes to remove (alive) `mark_dependence_addr`.
The instruction is conceptually equivalent to
```
%v = load %addr
%d = mark_dependence %v on %base
store %d to %addr
```
Therefore the address operand has to be defined as writing to the address.
To determine whether an instruction may require pack metadata, the types
of its operands are examined.
Previously, the top level type was checked for having a pack in its
signature, and the whole type was checked for having a type anywhere in
its layout (via TypeLowering). This didn't account for the case where
the metadata was required for a resilient type which uses a pack in its
signature.
Here, during type lowering, a type having a pack in its signature is
counted towards the type having a pack.
Fixes a compiler crash.
rdar://147207926
It is like `zeroInitializer`, but does not actually initialize the memory.
It only indicates to mandatory passes that the memory is going to be initialized.
Immortal C++ foreign reference types get TrivialTypeLowering instead of ReferenceTypeLowering, since they do not have retain/release lifetime operations. This was tripping up an assertion in SILVerifier.
rdar://147251759 / resolves https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/80065
