swiftDarwin and swiftOnoneSupport didn't depend on building the Swift core library.
This was a subtle bug, because the compiler just picked up the module from the SDK instead of the (still building) Swift module.
It only resulted in compiler errors if the SDK swiftinterface was too new to be parsable by the compiler.
Don't build the swiftCore module files in the bootstrapping phases. Instead use the module files in the SDK.
This reduces the build time overhead from 3min -> 30seconds.
- clarify the requirement that the entire collection must be accessible
- clarify the requirement surrounding subsequences / slices
- add parameter descriptions
- specify that buffer cannot be replaced
Use a temporary bitset to speed up the `Sequence` variant by roughly a factor of ~4-6, and the set/set variant by a factor of ~1-4, depending on the ratio of overlapping elements.
Use a temporary bitset to avoid hashing elements more than once, and to prevent rehashings during the creation of the result set.
This leads to a speedup of about 0-4x, depending on the number of elements removed.
- Use a temporary bitset to speed up the `Sequence` variant by roughly a factor of 4.
- Fix a logic error causing the `a == b` case for the set variant to be O(n) instead of O(1).
* Implement GraphemeWalker that does native grapheme breaking
* Bridged strings use native grapheme breaking for forward strides
* Implement bidirectional native grapheme breaking for native and foreign strings
* Remove ICU's grapheme breaking support
* Use UnicodeScalarView to implement GraphemeWalker
use an Iterator approach
remove Iterator conformance
* Incorporate Michael's feedback
more comments addressed
fix crlf bug
* Try bringing back some old fast paths
* Parameterize nextBoundary and previousBoundary
Parameterize nextBoundary and previousBoundary
* Implement Michael's suggestions
The key thing is that the move checker will not consider the explicit copy value
to be a copy_value that can be rewritten, ensuring that any uses of the result
of the explicit copy_value (consuming or other wise) are not checked.
Similar to the _move operator I recently introduced, this is a transparent
function so we can perform one level of specialization and thus at least be
generic over all concrete types.
This abbreviation for "if and only if" is confusing to those not coming
from a background in formal mathematics, and is frequently reported as a
type by developers reading the documentation.
This commit also changes doc comments in internal and private members,
which don't become part of the public documentation, because omitting
"iff" everywhere makes it much easier to check for any later changes
that reintroduce it.
This patch introduces a new stdlib function called _move:
```Swift
@_alwaysEmitIntoClient
@_transparent
@_semantics("lifetimemanagement.move")
public func _move<T>(_ value: __owned T) -> T {
#if $ExperimentalMoveOnly
Builtin.move(value)
#else
value
#endif
}
```
It is a first attempt at creating a "move" function for Swift, albeit a skleton
one since we do not yet perform the "no use after move" analysis. But this at
leasts gets the skeleton into place so we can built the analysis on top of it
and churn tree in a manageable way. Thus in its current incarnation, all it does
is take in an __owned +1 parameter and returns it after moving it through
Builtin.move.
Given that we want to use an OSSA based analysis for our "no use after move"
analysis and we do not have opaque values yet, we can not supporting moving
generic values since they are address only. This has stymied us in the past from
creating this function. With the implementation in this PR via a bit of
cleverness, we are now able to support this as a generic function over all
concrete types by being a little clever.
The trick is that when we transparent inline _move (to get the builtin), we
perform one level of specialization causing the inlined Builtin.move to be of a
loadable type. If after transparent inlining, we inline builtin "move" into a
context where it is still address only, we emit a diagnostic telling the user
that they applied move to a generic or existential and that this is not yet
supported.
The reason why we are taking this approach is that we wish to use this to
implement a new (as yet unwritten) diagnostic pass that verifies that _move
(even for non-trivial copyable values) ends the lifetime of the value. This will
ensure that one can write the following code to reliably end the lifetime of a
let binding in Swift:
```Swift
let x = Klass()
let _ = _move(x)
// hypotheticalUse(x)
```
Without the diagnostic pass, if one were to write another hypothetical use of x
after the _move, the compiler would copy x to at least hypotheticalUse(x)
meaning the lifetime of x would not end at the _move, =><=.
So to implement this diagnostic pass, we want to use the OSSA infrastructure and
that only works on objects! So how do we square this circle: by taking advantage
of the mandatory SIL optimzier pipeline! Specifically we take advantage of the
following:
1. Mandatory Inlining and Predictable Dead Allocation Elimination run before any
of the move only diagnostic passes that we run.
2. Mandatory Inlining is able to specialize a callee a single level when it
inlines code. One can take advantage of this to even at -Onone to
monomorphosize code.
and then note that _move is such a simple function that predictable dead
allocation elimination is able to without issue eliminate the extra alloc_stack
that appear in the caller after inlining without issue. So we (as the tests
show) get SIL that for concrete types looks exactly like we just had run a
move_value for that specific type as an object since we promote away the
stores/loads in favor of object operations when we eliminate the allocation.
In order to prevent any issue with this being used in a context where multiple
specializations may occur, I made the inliner emit a diagnostic if it inlines
_move into a function that applies it to an address only value. The diagnostic
is emitted at the source location where the function call occurs so it is easy
to find, e.x.:
```
func addressOnlyMove<T>(t: T) -> T {
_move(t) // expected-error {{move() used on a generic or existential value}}
}
moveonly_builtin_generic_failure.swift:12:5: error: move() used on a generic or existential value
_move(t)
^
```
To eliminate any potential ABI impact, if someone calls _move in a way that
causes it to be used in a context where the transparent inliner will not inline
it, I taught IRGen that Builtin.move is equivalent to a take from src -> dst and
marked _move as always emit into client (AEIC). I also took advantage of the
feature flag I added in the previous commit in order to prevent any cond_fails
from exposing Builtin.move in the stdlib. If one does not pass in the flag
-enable-experimental-move-only then the function just returns the value without
calling Builtin.move, so we are safe.
rdar://83957028
Adds two new IRGen-level builtins (one for allocating, the other for deallocating), a stdlib shim function for enhanced stack-promotion heuristics, and the proposed public stdlib functions.
This iteration ranged from `buffer.startIndex` to `buffer.count`, rather than to `buffer.endIndex`.
Using `buffer.indices` is a better solution in any case.
