As specified by the SE-0446 acceptance, extensions that declare a type's
conditional `Copyable` or `Escapable` ability must reiterate explicitly all
of the `Copyable` and/or `Escapable` requirements, whether required or not
required (by e.g. `~Copyable`) that were suppressed in the original
type declaration.
Find all the usages of `--enable-experimental-feature` or
`--enable-upcoming-feature` in the tests and replace some of the
`REQUIRES: asserts` to use `REQUIRES: swift-feature-Foo` instead, which
should correctly apply to depending on the asserts/noasserts mode of the
toolchain for each feature.
Remove some comments that talked about enabling asserts since they don't
apply anymore (but I might had miss some).
All this was done with an automated script, so some formatting weirdness
might happen, but I hope I fixed most of those.
There might be some tests that were `REQUIRES: asserts` that might run
in `noasserts` toolchains now. This will normally be because their
feature went from experimental to upcoming/base and the tests were not
updated.
If the extension adds conformance to an invertible protocol, it's
confusing for people to also infer conditional requirements on the
generic parameters for those invertible protocols. This came up in the
review of SE-427.
It doesn't really make sense for a conditional conformance requirement
for `Copyable` to depend on any other requirement other than other
`Copyable` conformance requirements.
resolves rdar://124967739
