Repurpose mangling operator `Y` as an umbrella operator that covers new attributes on function types. Free up operators `J`, `j`, and `k`.
```
async ::= 'Ya' // 'async' annotation on function types
sendable ::= 'Yb' // @Sendable on function types
throws ::= 'K' // 'throws' annotation on function types
differentiable ::= 'Yjf' // @differentiable(_forward) on function type
differentiable ::= 'Yjr' // @differentiable(reverse) on function type
differentiable ::= 'Yjd' // @differentiable on function type
differentiable ::= 'Yjl' // @differentiable(_linear) on function type
```
Resolves rdar://76299796.
Most of the async runtime functions have been changed to not
expect the task and executor to be passed in. When knowing the
task and executor is necessary, there are runtime functions
available to recover them.
The biggest change I had to make to a runtime function signature
was to swift_task_switch, which has been altered to expect to be
passed the context and resumption function instead of requiring
the caller to park the task. This has the pleasant consequence
of allowing the implementation to very quickly turn around when
it recognizes that the current executor is satisfactory. It does
mean that on arm64e we have to sign the continuation function
pointer as an argument and then potentially resign it when
assigning into the task's resume slot.
rdar://70546948
This is conditional on UseAsyncLowering and in the future should also be
conditional on `clangTargetInfo.isSwiftAsyncCCSupported()` once that
support is merged.
Update tests to work either with swiftcc or swifttailcc.
Previously, the "bare" linkage of a link entity was used to determine
whether to put an async function pointer into the tbd. That did not
match the mechanism by which the linkage was determined in IRGen.
There, the linkage is the "_effective_" linkage (i.e. the value returned
from SILFunction::getEffectiveSymbolLinkage).
Here, whether to put the async function pointer corresponding to a class
method is determined on the basis of that effective linkage.
rdar://problem/73203508