When Swift imports C structs, it synthesizes an initializer that takes no arguments and zero-initializes the C struct.
When C++ interop is enabled, Clang treats all C structs as if they were C++ structs. This means that some of the C structs will get a default constructor implicitly generated by Clang. This implicit default constructor will not zero-initialize trivial fields of the struct.
This is a common source of confusion and subtle bugs for developers who try to enable C++ interop in existing projects that use C interop and rely on zero-initialization of C structs.
rdar://115909532
The use of 'nocapture' for parameters and return values is incorrect for C++ types, as they can actually capture a pointer into its own value (e.g. std::string in libstdc++)
rdar://115062687
Rewrite the handling for the `CxxStdlib` implicit linking to use a
slightly more functional style for filtering. Additionally, add Windows
to the list providing the overlay. The Windows linking scenario is a
slightly more complicated as the library names differ between static and
dynamic variants to disambiguate between import libraries and static
libraries. Take this into account when embedding the library name so
that the linker can find the appropriate content.
Also, make some related changes, like updating a path in the Android doc, making sure the
`unknown` vendor is always used, and using `CPU` instead of `CODEGENERATOR`.
`Swift` is the name of the Swift standard library module. Creating another module with this name breaks assumptions in the compiler and caused these two tests to fail.
