Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Erik Eckstein
6714a72256 Optimizer: re-implement and improve the AllocBoxToStack pass
This pass replaces `alloc_box` with `alloc_stack` if the box is not escaping.
The original implementation had some limitations. It could not handle cases of local functions which are called multiple times or even recursively, e.g.

```
public func foo() -> Int {
  var i = 1

  func localFunction() { i += 1 }

  localFunction()
  localFunction()
  return i
}

```

The new implementation (done in Swift) fixes this problem with a new algorithm.
It's not only more powerful, but also simpler: the new pass has less than half lines of code than the old pass.

The pass is invoked in the mandatory pipeline and later in the optimizer pipeline.
The new implementation provides a module-pass for the mandatory pipeline (whereas the "regular" pass is a function pass).
This is required because the mandatory pass needs to remove originals of specialized closures, which cannot be done from a function-pass.
In the old implementation this was done with a hack by adding a semantic attribute and deleting the function later in the pipeline.

I still kept the sources of the old pass for being able to bootstrap the compiler without a host compiler.

rdar://142756547
2025-06-20 08:15:04 +02:00
Kavon Farvardin
5230b19ef6 Test: replace '@_moveOnly' with '~Copyable' 2024-07-23 11:05:33 -07:00
Michael Gottesman
37d60a08bb [move-only] Rename mark_must_check -> mark_unresolved_non_copyable_value.
I was originally hoping to reuse mark_must_check for multiple types of checkers.
In practice, this is not what happened... so giving it a name specifically to do
with non copyable types makes more sense and makes the code clearer.

Just a pure rename.
2023-08-30 22:29:30 -07:00
Michael Gottesman
0b38bbaba0 Update some allocbox to stack tests given I removed early allocbox to stack. 2023-05-15 11:18:17 -07:00
Michael Gottesman
224674cad1 [move-only] Ensure that we treat captured escaping closure arguments as such even if the closure doesn't actually escape
Specifically, we already have the appropriate semantics for arguments captured
by escaping closures but in certain cases allocbox to stack is able to prove
that the closure doesn’t actually escape. This results in the capture being
converted into a non-escaping SIL form. This then causes the move checker to
emit the wrong kind of error.

The solution is to create an early allocbox to stack that doesn’t promote move
only types in boxes from heap -> stack if it is captured by an escaping closure
but does everything else normally. Then once the move checking is completed, we
run alloc box to stack an additional time to ensure that we keep the guarantee
that heap -> stack is performed in those cases.

rdar://108905586
2023-05-04 12:25:19 -07:00
Kavon Farvardin
2c7d9a5047 update tests given move-only types are enabled
the main things still left behind the experimental flag(s) are
- move-only classes (guarded by MoveOnlyClasses feature)
- noimplicitcopy
- the _borrow operator
2023-03-14 18:35:13 -07:00
Kavon Farvardin
748af7a683 enable lexical borrow scopes for a test that needs it 2023-03-14 17:41:04 -07:00
Michael Gottesman
1dd896ded9 [move-only] Implement escaping closure semantics.
NOTE: A few of the test patterns need to be made better, but this patch series
is large enough, I want to get it into tree and iterate.
2023-02-20 11:04:21 -08:00
Michael Gottesman
969d776c15 [allocbox-to-stack] When we promote a heap -> stack of noncopyable type, move mark_must_check onto alloc_stack and always
ensure that we use consumable_to_assign.

What this patch is does is add an extra phase after alloc_box runs where we look
at uses of the alloc_stack and if we see any mark_must_check of any kind, we
delete them and rewrite a single mark_must_check [consumable_and_assignable] on
the alloc_stack and make all uses of the alloc_stack go through the
mark_must_check.

This has two effects:

1. In a subsequent PR when I add noncopyable semantics for escaping closures,
this will cause allocbox to stack to convert such boxes from having escaping
semantics to having non-escaping semantics. Escaping semantics means that we
always reproject out from the box and use mark_must_check
[assignable_but_not_consumable] (since we can't consume from the box, but can
assign to it). In contrast, non-escaping semantics means that the box becomes an
alloc_stack and we use the traditional var checker semantics. NOTE: We can do
this for lets represented as addresses and vars since the typechecker will
validate that the let is never actually written to even if at the SIL level we
would allow that.

2. In cases where we are implementing simple mark_must_check
[consumable_and_assignable] on one of the project_box and capture the box, we
used to have a problem where the direct box uses would be on the alloc_stack and
not go through the mark_must_check. Now, all uses after allocbox_to_stack occur
go through the mark_must_check. This is why I was able to remove instances of
the "compiler does not understand this pattern" errors... since the compiler
with this change can now understand them.
2023-02-18 12:38:38 -08:00