Completion can end up calling into pre-checking multiple times in
certain cases, make sure we don't attempt to fold a SequenceExpr
multiple times since its original AST is in a broken state
post-folding. Instead, just return the already-folded expression.
rdar://133717866
- Make `539adae64314fae.swift` macOS-only and use guard malloc for it.
- Tweak `1e4b431ffe374ef1.swift` such that it succeeds if it either
times out after a minute or crashes. While here, also clean up the
test case a little.
`TypeSimplifier` may not eliminate type variables from e.g the
pattern types of pattern expansion types since they can remain
unresolved due to e.g having a placeholder count type. Make sure we
eliminate any remaining type variables along with the placeholders.
There's probably a more principled fix here, but this is a quick and
low risk fix we can hopefully take for 6.2.
rdar://154954995
If we fail to resolve the value type for a value generic parameter,
previously we would have returned a null Type, causing crashes
downstream. Instead, return an ErrorType, leaving a null Type for
cases where the generic parameter isn't a value generic at all.
rdar://154856417
`substBase` here can contain type variables or placeholders, avoid
using them as the original ErrorTypes since ErrorTypes cannot be
solver-allocated currently. This only affects type printing so
shouldn't matter much.
Use the higher level APIs on SourceManager that handle locations in
parent vs child buffers. This then allows us to fix `walkToDeclPre`
such that we don't set the found DeclContext unless the location is
actually within that decl (here the location may well be in a
separate buffer as we may have a replaced function body).
The logic here for completion wasn't actually
helping things since it would result in adding the
var overload to the system, which would result
in an ErrorType binding. We could turn the ErrorType
into a placeholder when resolving the overload,
but the simpler solution is to just allow CSGen
to turn the reference into a PlaceholderType. This
matches what we do for regular solving, and fixes
a crash with an IUO completion.
rdar://89369091
On Windows, we run into the following situation when running SourceKit-LSP tests:
- The SDK is located at `S:\Program Files\Swift\Platforms\Windows.platform\Developer\SDKs\Windows.sdk` with `S:` being a substitution drive
- We find `Swift.swiftmodule` at `S:\Program Files\Swift\Platforms\Windows.platform\Developer\SDKs\Windows.sdk\usr\lib\swift\windows\Swift.swiftmodule`
- Now, to check if `Swift.swiftmodule` is a system module, we take the realpath of the SDK, which resolves the substitution drive an results in something like `C:\Users\alex\src\Program Files\Swift\Platforms\Windows.platform\Developer\SDKs\Windows.sdk`
- Since we don’t take the realpath of `Swift.swiftmodule`, we will assume that it’s not in the SDK, because the SDK’s path is on `C:` while `Swift.swiftmodule` lives on `S:`
To fix this, we also need to check if a module’s real path is inside the SDK.
Fixesswiftlang/sourcekit-lsp#1770
rdar://138210224
Modules defined within the SDK are considered
non-user modules, extend this to any module found
within the parent platform directory if there is
one. This ensures we include modules such as
XCTest and Testing.
rdar://131854240
Add a cached request to perform pattern resolution.
This is needed to prevent the constraint system
from resolving the same pattern multiple times
along different solver paths, which could result
in creating different pattern nodes for each path.
Once pattern resolution is moved to pre-checking
we ought to be able to make this uncached.
rdar://128661960
Computing capture information requires a type checked AST, which we don’t have during code completion. To fix an assertion failure, don’t look for a captured `isolated` parameter while computing a closure’s actor isolation during code completion.
rdar://126923558
To compute the expected type of a call pattern (which is the return type of the function if that call pattern is being used), we called `getTypeForCompletion` for the entire call, in the same way that we do for the code completion token. However, this pattern does not generally work. For the code completion token it worked because the code completion expression doesn’t have an inherent type and it inherits the type solely from its context. Calls, however, have an inherent return type and that type gets assigned as the `typeForCompletion`.
Implement targeted checks for the two most common cases where an expected type exists: If the call that we suggest call patterns for is itself an argument to another function or if it is used in a place that has a contextual type in the constraint system (eg. a variable binding or a `return` statement). This means that we no longer return `Convertible` for call patterns in some more complex scenarios. But given that this information was computed based on incorrect results and that in those cases all call patterns had a `Convertible` type relation, I think that’s acceptable. Fixing this would require recording more information in the constraints system, which is out-of-scope for now.
When completing in cases like `bar(arg: foo(|, option: 1)`, we don’t know if `option` belongs to the call to `foo` or `bar`. Be defensive and also suggest the signature.
This removes the distinction between argument completions and postfix expr paren completions, which was meaningless since solver-based completion.
It then determines whether to suggest the entire function call pattern (with all argument labels) or only a single argument based on whether there are any existing arguments in the call.
For this to work properly, we need to improve parser recovery a little bit so that it parsers arguments after the code completion token properly.
This should make call pattern heuristics obsolete.
rdar://84809503
`getLoc` does not necesarrily return the start location of the location (e.g. for `a.b().c()` it returns the location of `c` because that’s the location of the call). But we used the location from `getLoc` as the start location of the synthesized `buildExpression` call. In the added test case, this means that the `buildExpression` call only contained `everlay() {}` and not the code completion token. We thus infered that we could skip it the entire `MyStack {}.pnTabGesture {}.everlay() {}` call for code completion, which isn’t correct.
rdar://120798355
