Checking whether a declaration is in a `.swiftinterface` is a very common query
that is made somewhat awkward because declarations are not always in source
files. To make these checks more ergonomic, expose a convenience on
DeclContext.
When using `-experimental-skip-all-function-bodies` we don’t run the `TypeCheckSourceFileRequest` and thus don’t go through the decl checker, which calls `InheritedTypeRequest` on all inheritance clauses. This means that the inherited entries are not populated by the time we serialize the module. Trigger the computation of inherited entries by calling `InheritedTypeRequest` during serialization.
Unfortunately, we can’t use the type returned by `getResolvedType` for the serialization because `getResolvedType` returns an inverted protocol type for suppressed conformances but during serialization, we want to serialize the suppressed type with a `isSuppressedBit`. We thus need to call `getEntry(i).getType()` again to get the type to serialize.
rdar://141440011
Most of the compiler should use SemanticAvailableAttr instead. In contexts like
ASTDumper where a semantic attribute is unavailable use accessors on
AvailableAttr.
NFC.
Now that AvailableAttr has storage for its cached AvailabilityDomain, it's no
longer necessary to store an AvailabilityDomain inline in
SemanticAvailableAttr.
NFC.
Right now it is basically a version of nonisolated beyond a few simple cases
like constructors/destructors where we are pretty sure we want to not support
this.
This is part of my bringup strategy for changing nonisolated/unspecified to be
caller isolation inheriting.
I need this today to add the implicit isolated parameter... but I can imagine us
adding more implicit parameters in the future, so it makes sense to formalize it
so it is easier to do in the future.
Extend the module trace format with a field indicating whether a given
module, or any module it depends on, was compiled with strict memory
safety enabled. This separate output from the compiler can be used as
part of an audit to determine what parts of Swift programs are built
with strict memory safety checking enabled.
When Swift passes search paths to clang, it does so directly into the HeaderSearch. That means that those paths get ordered inconsistently compared to the equivalent clang flag, and causes inconsistencies when building clang modules with clang and with Swift. Instead of touching the HeaderSearch directly, pass Swift search paths as driver flags, just do them after the -Xcc ones.
Swift doesn't have a way to pass a search path to clang as -isystem, only as -I which usually isn't the right flag. Add an -Isystem Swift flag so that those paths can be passed to clang as -isystem.
rdar://93951328
Protocol conformances have a handful attributes that can apply to them
directly, including @unchecked (for Sendable), @preconcurrency, and
@retroactive. Generalize this into an option set that we carry around,
so it's a bit easier to add them, as well as reworking the
serialization logic to deal with an arbitrary number of such options.
Use this generality to add support for @unsafe conformances, which are
needed when unsafe witnesses are used to conform to safe requirements.
Implement general support for @unsafe conformances, including
producing a single diagnostic per missing @unsafe that provides a
Fix-It and collects together all of the unsafe witnesses as notes.
This attribute will allow you to specify an alternate version of the declaration used for mangling. It will allow minor adjustments to be made to declarations so long as they’re still compatible at the calling convention level, such as refining isolation or sendability, renaming without breaking ABI, etc.
The attribute is behind the experimental feature flag `ABIAttribute`.
Introduce an attribute to allow unsafe code within the annotated
declaration without presenting an unsafe interface to users. This is,
by its nature, and unsafe construct, and is used to document where
unsafe behavior is encapsulated in safe constructs.
There is an optional message that can be used as part of an audit
trail.
When serializing the module interface path of an interface that
is part of the SDK, we serialize relative to the SDK path. During
deserialization we need to know if a path was serialized relative
to the SDK or not. The existing logic assumes any relative path
has been serialized relative to the SDK, which makes it impossible
to compile modules from relative swiftinterface paths that are not
part of the SDK.
Update the swiftmodule file to include an attribute to show if the
path was serialized relative to the SDK or not, which is used
during deserialization to correctly reconstruct the interface path.
Many APIs using nonescapable types would like to vend interior pointers to their
parameter bindings, but this isn't normally always possible because of representation
changes the caller may do around the call, such as moving the value in or out of memory,
bridging or reabstracting it, etc. `@_addressable` forces the corresponding parameter
to be passed indirectly in memory, in its maximally-abstracted representation.
[TODO] If return values have a lifetime dependency on this parameter, the caller must
keep this in-memory representation alive for the duration of the dependent value's
lifetime.
Rename decls are typically derived from the rename strings attached to a
`@available` attributes. It shouldn't be necessary to serialize the cached
rename decls since they can be rederived. The only decls that have rename decls
and don't have reanme strings are synthesized by ClangImporter and don't get
serialized.
This type is intended to be used to wrap compiler synthesized nodes
(i.e. variables) to make it easier for diagnostic to diagnose precise
failure locations.
Consider the situation like:
```
protocol P {}
extension Array: P where Element: P {}
func test<T: P>() -> T {
$_a = ...
$_b = ...
return [$_a, $_b]
}
```
This is a common pattern with result builders.
In this case if one of the elements don't conform to `P` the best
user experience would be to attach diagnostic to the element otherwise
the developers would have to figure out where in result expression
the error occured before attempting to fix it.
This patch adds support for serialization and deserialization of
debug scopes.
Debug scopes are serialized in post order and enablement is
controlled through the experimental-serialize-debug-info flag which
is turned off by default. Functions only referred to by these debug
scopes are deserialized as zombie functions directly.
Add flag `-load-resolved-plugin` to load macro plugin, which provides a
pre-resolved entry into PluginLoader so the plugins can be loaded based
on module name without searching the file system. The option is mainly
intended to be used by explicitly module build and the flag is supplied
by dependency scanner.
Today ParenType is used:
1. As the type of ParenExpr
2. As the payload type of an unlabeled single
associated value enum case (and the type of
ParenPattern).
3. As the type for an `(X)` TypeRepr
For 1, this leads to some odd behavior, e.g the
type of `(5.0 * 5).squareRoot()` is `(Double)`. For
2, we should be checking the arity of the enum case
constructor parameters and the presence of
ParenPattern respectively. Eventually we ought to
consider replacing Paren/TuplePattern with a
PatternList node, similar to ArgumentList.
3 is one case where it could be argued that there's
some utility in preserving the sugar of the type
that the user wrote. However it's really not clear
to me that this is particularly desirable since a
bunch of diagnostic logic is already stripping
ParenTypes. In cases where we care about how the
type was written in source, we really ought to be
consulting the TypeRepr.
It might be unexpected to future users that `-swift-compiler-version`
would produce a version aligned to .swiftinterface instead of one used
to build the .swiftmodule file. To avoid this possible confusion, let's
scope down the version to `-interface-compiler-version` flag and
`SWIFT_INTERFACE_COMPILER_VERSION` option in the module.
If swiftinterface doesn't have `-swift-compiler-version` flag
it means that it was generated with an older version of the
Swift compiler. In such cases it would be incorrect to use
"current" compiler version because the field is intended to
indicate the compiler the swiftinterface was built with.
