Find all the usages of `--enable-experimental-feature` or
`--enable-upcoming-feature` in the tests and replace some of the
`REQUIRES: asserts` to use `REQUIRES: swift-feature-Foo` instead, which
should correctly apply to depending on the asserts/noasserts mode of the
toolchain for each feature.
Remove some comments that talked about enabling asserts since they don't
apply anymore (but I might had miss some).
All this was done with an automated script, so some formatting weirdness
might happen, but I hope I fixed most of those.
There might be some tests that were `REQUIRES: asserts` that might run
in `noasserts` toolchains now. This will normally be because their
feature went from experimental to upcoming/base and the tests were not
updated.
Resilence support will require changes to the Objective-C runtime to expand support for metadata initialization functions. Add a separate experimental feature flag to help with staging that support in, and modify diagnostics to not suggest increasing the minimum deployment target for now.
When an @objc @implementation class requires the use of `ClassMetadataStrategy::Update` because some of its stored properties do not have fixed sizes, we adjust the direct field offsets during class realization by emitting a custom metadata update function which calls a new entry point in the Swift runtime. That entry point adjusts field offsets like `swift_updateClassMetadata2()`, but it only assumes that the class has Objective-C metadata, not Swift metadata.
This commit introduces an alternative mechanism which does the same thing without using any Swift-only metadata. It’s a rough implementation with important limitations:
• We’re currently using the field offset vector, which means that field offsets are being emitted into @objc @implementation classes; these will be removed.
• The new Swift runtime entry point duplicates a lot of `swift_updateClassMetadata2()`’s implementation; it will be refactored into something much smaller and more compact.
• Availability bounds for this feature have not yet been implemented.
Future commits in this PR will correct these issues.
• ObjCImplementation controls @implementation on extensions
• CImplementation controls @implementation and @_objcImplementation on cdecl functions
Why the difference between them? Because `@_objcImplementation extension` has already been adopted pretty widely, while `@_objcImplementation @_cdecl` is very new.
Without this change, an `@_objcImplementation` cannot override parent class methods, because the special access control behavior breaks the access control checks for overrides.
This commit begins to generate correct metadata for @_objcImplementation extensions:
• Swift-specific metadata and symbols are not generated.
• For main-class @_objcImpls, we visit the class to emit metadata, but visit the extension’s members.
• Includes both IR tests and executable tests, including coverage of same-module @objc subclasses, different-module @objc subclasses, and clang subclasses.
The test cases do not yet cover stored properties.
