* [cxx-interop] Add Hashable conformance to imported enums
Previously, imported enums only conformed to RawRepresentable and Equatable,
so they could not be used as members of a Set or keys of a Dictionary.
This patch adds Hashable conformance to give them that ability,
as well as some test cases to clarify the expected behavior.
Existing test cases are updated to reflect this new conformance.
rdar://129713687
If possible, add imported members to the StructDecl's LookupTable rather than adding them directly as members. This will fix the issues with ordering that #39436 poorly attempted to solve during IRGen.
This also allows us to break out most of the test changes from #39436.
For more fine grained annoations. For now, it's handled as the same as
'Keyword' name kind.
Fix an issue where 'extension' wasn't marked as "keyword".
Also, move 'static' priting out of 'SkipIntroducerKeywords' guard
because 'static' is not an declaration introducer.
Introduce checking of ConcurrentValue conformances:
- For structs, check that each stored property conforms to ConcurrentValue
- For enums, check that each associated value conforms to ConcurrentValue
- For classes, check that each stored property is immutable and conforms
to ConcurrentValue
Because all of the stored properties / associated values need to be
visible for this check to work, limit ConcurrentValue conformances to
be in the same source file as the type definition.
This checking can be disabled by conforming to a new marker protocol,
UnsafeConcurrentValue, that refines ConcurrentValue.
UnsafeConcurrentValue otherwise his no specific meaning. This allows
both "I know what I'm doing" for types that manage concurrent access
themselves as well as enabling retroactive conformance, both of which
are fundamentally unsafe but also quite necessary.
The bulk of this change ended up being to the standard library, because
all conformances of standard library types to the ConcurrentValue
protocol needed to be sunk down into the standard library so they
would benefit from the checking above. There were numerous little
mistakes in the initial pass through the stsandard library types that
have now been corrected.
The Base class already includes them, so don't duplicate them in its
subclasses. Also stops us including members from extensions of the base class
itself.
Resolves rdar://problem/50960433
We would previously hide the protocol, its extensions and members, but the '_'
prefix really just means the protocol itself isn't intended for clients, rather
than its members.
This also adds support for 'fully_annotated_decl' entries in doc-info for
extensions to be consistent with every other decl, and removes the
'fully_annotated_generic_signature' entry we supplied as a fallback.
Also fixes several bugs with the synthesized extensions mechanism:
- The type sustitutions applied to the extension's requirements were computed
using the extension itself as the decl context rather than the extension's
nominal. The meant the extension's requirements themselves were assumed to
hold when determining the substitutions, so equality constraints were always
met. Because of this extension members were incorrectly merged with the base
nominal or its extensions despite having additional constraints.
- Types within the requirements weren't being transformed when printed (e.g.
'Self.Element' was printed rather than 'T') both in the interface output and
in the requirements list. We were also incorrectly printing requirements
that were already satisfied once the base type was subsituted in.
- If both the protocol extension and 'enabling' extension of the base nominal
that added the protocol conformance had conditional requirements, we were
only printing the protocol extension's requirements in the synthesized
extension.
- The USR and annotated decl output embedded in the 'key.doc.full_as_xml'
string for synthesized members were printed to match their original context, rather than
the synthesized one.
Resolves rdar://problem/57121937
This attribute is intended to mean there's a replacement declaration that
should be used instead in Swift code. We already filter out decls with this
attribute in code completion, but were still exposing them in generated
interfaces.
Resolves rdar://problem/62464954
It's treated as a keyword by syntactic highlighting, but wasn't annotated as a
keyword by code completion, cursor info, or doc info.
Resolves rdar://problem/61114942
Not NFC because it changes the printing behavior for function type
parameters. They are no longer reported as types (paren, tuple, or raw),
but as Params.
Currently when function types like `(_: Int...) -> Void` are mangled
their names are going to include enclosing sugar BoundGenericType(Array),
which is not necessary and doesn’t play well with `AnyFunctionType::Param`
which strips the sugar away.
Resolves: rdar://problem/34941557
Rather than mangling the complete generic signature of a constrained
extension, only mangle the requirements not already satisfied by the
nominal type. For example, given:
extension Dictionary where Value: Equatable {
// OLD: _T0s10DictionaryV2t3s8HashableRzs9EquatableR_r0_lE3baryyF
// NEW: _T0s10DictionaryV2t3s9EquatableR_rlE3baryyF
public func bar() { }
}
In the existing mangling, we mangle the `Key: Hashable` requirement that’s
part of the generic signature. With this change, we only mangle the new
requirement (`Value: Equatable`).
This is a win for constrained extensions *except* in the case of a
constrained extension of a nominal type with a single, unconstrained
generic parameter:
extension Array where Element: Equatable {
// OLD: _T0Sa2t3s9EquatableRzlE3baryyF
// NEW would be: _T0Sa2t3s9EquatableRzrlE3baryyF
public func bar() { }
}
Check explicily for this shortcut mangling and fall back to the old
path, so this change is a strict improvement.
