Don't allow a pattern like:
for var x in sequence {
...
}
and provide a removal fix-it for the 'var' keyword.
Additionally, for the following code:
for let x in sequence {
...
}
Provide a removal fix-it since the 'let' specifier is now
redundant.
rdar://problem/23172698
Swift SVN r32818
Before this commit, for a var decl at top level, code completion engine assumes the code
completion token contained in this decl is the end point of the delayed parsing, i.e. the
second pass of code completion. This may lead to incomplete ASTs during the second pass, for
instance, when the code completion token lies at the second argument of a call expr that takes
three arguments. We fix the issue by allowing the first pass to pre-register the end location of
a top-level var decl since the first pass is a more error-tolerant and holistic parsing, and the second
pass to reuse this loc.
Swift SVN r32729
Now we can handle simple cases like
1 + 1 == 2 <here>
and correctly suggest both + on the 2 and || on the boolean. When the
LHS doesn't type-check we fallback to using only the operand immediately
to the left.
Swift SVN r32489
r32195 introduced new behavior when there was an error with a build
config: if there was an error, never parse. This was to prevent noise
when a block of code guarded by a _compiler_version clause was
syntatically wrong/misspelled, making it active when it shouldn't have
been. This supressed parsing blocks guarded by other build configs,
which is kind of a regression since, until _compiler_version, all build
configs were always parsed, even if their clauses are inactive. Skipping
parsing may hinder indentation, code folding, and parse-aware
highlighting.
If there is a valid switch on _compiler_version, continue to
skip parsing and supress Lex diagnostics for inactive blocks. If there
is an error evaluating a build config, parse all of its blocks.
rdar://problem/22730282
Swift SVN r32205
This configuration clause will suppress lex diagnostics and skip parsing
altogether if the code under the clause isn't active - the compiler must
have a repository version greater than or equal to the version given to
_compiler_version.
This option is only meant to be used sparingly and not to track the
Swift *language* version.
Example, if using a compiler versioned 700.0.28:
#if _compiler_version("700.0.23")
print("This code will compile for versions 700.0.23 and later.")
#else
This + code + will + not + be + parsed
#endif
Included are new diagnostics for checking that the version is formatted
correctly and isn't empty.
New tests:
- Compiler version comparison unit tests
- Build configuration diagnostics
- Skipping parsing of code under inactive clauses
rdar://problem/22730282
Swift SVN r32195
Emit a fix-it replacing them with double-quote string literals.
<rdar://problem/21950709> QoI: Parse single-quoted literals like double-quoted literals
Swift SVN r31973
When users invoke code completion at an argument position, we suggest argument names,
if required however not specified, or a list of argument values. These values are annotated
with their type relation to the expected argument types, so that
Xcode can prioritize those values that apply over those that do not.
This also fixes: rdar://21727063
Swift SVN r31505
When users complete the right-hand side of an assignment expression, we only
show the results whose types are convertible to those of the left-hand side.
Swift SVN r31357
Sink the actual logic for omitting needless words way down into
Basic, so we can re-use it elsewhere. Tie the Clang importer into that
logic, mapping Clang types down to strings appropriately. NFC
Swift SVN r31233
Before this commit, for unresolved members, code completion suggests all visible enum elements
and option set types. To refine the results, this commit uses constraint solver to infer
the type of unresolved members by analyzing parental expressions. If the solver has solutions,
we complete the unresolved member, otherwise abort.
rdar://16659653
Swift SVN r31195
This way they can be used from other projects, like LLDB. The downside
is we now have to make sure the header is included consistently in all
the places we care about, but I think in practice that won't be a problem,
especially not with tests.
rdar://problem/22240127
Swift SVN r31173
This commit completes an unresolved member with all visible enum elements.
We need future work to reduce the list to those that are guaranteed to be
resolved under the current context.
Swift SVN r31063
When a user invoke code completion after import keywords, the names of
visible top level clang modules were recommended for finishing the import decl.
(Undoing revert r30961 of r30957, which just required lockstep commit to
SourceKit -- cwillmore)
Swift SVN r30962
This reverts r30957 because it broke the following tests on Jenkins:
SourceKit :: CodeComplete/complete_open.swift
SourceKit :: CodeComplete/complete_test.swift
<rdar://problem/22120345> swift-incremental-RA #8289 failed to build
Swift SVN r30961
When a user invoke code completion after import keywords, the names of
visible top level clang modules were recommended for finishing the import decl.
Swift SVN r30957
Compute the hash of all interface tokens when parsing; write the
interface hash to the swiftdeps file, or if the -dump-interface-hash
option is passed to the frontend. This hash will be used in incremental
mode to determine whether a file's interface has changed, and therefore
whether dependent files need to be rebuilt in response to the change.
Committed on ChrisW's behalf while he gets his setup unborked.
rdar://problem/15352929
Swift SVN r30477
When a line begins with '.', it's almost always due to a method chain, not an attempt to start an expression with a contextual member lookup. This is a more principled grammar rule than the long tail of hacks we've been putting up to try to accommodate "builder pattern" usages. Fixes rdar://problem/20238557.
Swift SVN r29606
Fixes a problem where curried parameter lists of operator function
definitions were being treated inconsistently, complaining about
removing an argument label but pretending that the parameter didn't
have an argument label to start with. Fixes rdar://problem/21275319.
Swift SVN r29346
And for "try return", "try throw", and "try let", get even more specific,
with a fix-it to suggest moving the "try" onto the expression.
rdar://problem/21043120
Swift SVN r28862
Instead, provide the location of the { in a closure expr to the argument formation as
part of the datastructure already used to manage implicit closure arguments in the parser.
Swift SVN r28818
It's not okay to filter to only ErrorType results, since we may be
trying to chain to an error type result foo.bar.getError(). And the
existing logic had no way to handle results from other modules, so we
were missing key results like 'NSError'.
Eventually we'll want to bring back something like this that handles all
modules, but as a way to bump the priority of ErrorType results rather
than to filter out everything else.
rdar://problem/20985515
Swift SVN r28716
Factor out the special case condition for deciding whether a period_prefix should be treated like a MemberRef postfix production instead of a new UnresolvedMemberExpr, and share it with the generic type disambiguation code, so that 'Foo<T>\n.bar()' parses consistently with 'Foo\n.bar()'. Extend the condition to consider a '.foo' reference on a line by itself in postfix position as a postfix continuation as well, allowing properties to be chained in builder fashion too. Addresses rdar://problem/20238557, but we may want to still make a more general change to the grammar here.
Swift SVN r28707
