This is safe because the closure is not allowed to capture the array according
to the documentation of 'withUnsafeMutableBuffer' and the current implementation
makes sure that any such capture would observe an empty array by swapping self
with an empty array.
Users will get "almost guaranteed" stack promotion for small arrays by writing
something like:
func testStackAllocation(p: Proto) {
var a = [p, p, p]
a.withUnsafeMutableBufferPointer {
let array = $0
work(array)
}
}
It is "almost guaranteed" because we need to statically be able to tell the size
required for the array (no unspecialized generics) and the total buffer size
must not exceed 1K.
LSValue::reduce reduces a set of LSValues (mapped to a set of LSLocations) to
a single LSValue.
It can then be used as the forwarding value for the location.
Previously, we expand into intermediate nodes and leaf nodes and then go bottom
up, trying to create a single LSValue out of the given LSValues.
Instead, we now use a recursion to go top down. This simplifies the code. And this
is fine as we do not expect to run into type tree that are too deep.
Existing test cases ensure correctness.
This enables function signature handles a case of self-recursion.
With this change we convert 11 @owned return value to "not owned", while
we convert 179 @owned parameter to @guanrateed.
rdar://24022375
More specifically, this handles a case of self-recursion.
With this change we convert 11 @owned return value to "not owned", while
we convert 179 @owned parameter to @guanrateed.
rdar://24022375
Reinstates commit 0c2ca94ef7
With two bug fixes:
*) use after free asan crash
*) wrong check in ValueLifetimeAnalysis::isWithinLifetime
And some refactoring
We were giving special handling to ApplyInst when we were attempting to use
getMemoryBehavior(). This commit changes the special handling to work on all
full apply sites instead of just AI. Additionally, we look through partial
applies and thin to thick functions.
I also added a dumper called BasicInstructionPropertyDumper that just dumps the
results of SILInstruction::get{Memory,Releasing}Behavior() for all instructions
in order to verify this behavior.
With this re-abstraction a specialized function has the same calling convention as if it would have been written with the specialized types in the first place.
In general this results in less alloc_stacks and load/stores.
It also can eliminate some re-abstraction thunks, e.g. if a generic closure is used in a non-generic context.
It some (hopefully rare) cases it may require to add re-abstraction thunks.
In case a function has multiple indirect results, only the first is converted to a direct result. This is an open TODO.
Currently the array.get_element calls return the element as indirect result.
The generic specializer will change so that the element can be returned as direct result.
For a release on a guaranteed function paramater, we know right away
that its not the final release and therefore does not call deinit.
Therefore we know it does not read or write memory other than the reference
count.
This reduces the compilation time of dead store and redundant load elim. As
we need to go over alias analysis to make sure tracked locations do not alias
with it.
Instead of only checking the return block, we could potentially check
its predecessors and its predecessors's predecessors, etc.
Alos put in a threshold to throttle this to make sure its cheap.
We are still only being able to find of a small # of epilogue retains.
The bail on MayDecrement is blocking many of the opportunites.
This should bring us closer to being able to handle Walsh.
This is part of rdar://24022375.
Similarly to how we've always handled parameter types, we
now recursively expand tuples in result types and separately
determine a result convention for each result.
The most important code-generation change here is that
indirect results are now returned separately from each
other and from any direct results. It is generally far
better, when receiving an indirect result, to receive it
as an independent result; the caller is much more likely
to be able to directly receive the result in the address
they want to initialize, rather than having to receive it
in temporary memory and then copy parts of it into the
target.
The most important conceptual change here that clients and
producers of SIL must be aware of is the new distinction
between a SILFunctionType's *parameters* and its *argument
list*. The former is just the formal parameters, derived
purely from the parameter types of the original function;
indirect results are no longer in this list. The latter
includes the indirect result arguments; as always, all
the indirect results strictly precede the parameters.
Apply instructions and entry block arguments follow the
argument list, not the parameter list.
A relatively minor change is that there can now be multiple
direct results, each with its own result convention.
This is a minor change because I've chosen to leave
return instructions as taking a single operand and
apply instructions as producing a single result; when
the type describes multiple results, they are implicitly
bound up in a tuple. It might make sense to split these
up and allow e.g. return instructions to take a list
of operands; however, it's not clear what to do on the
caller side, and this would be a major change that can
be separated out from this already over-large patch.
Unsurprisingly, the most invasive changes here are in
SILGen; this requires substantial reworking of both call
emission and reabstraction. It also proved important
to switch several SILGen operations over to work with
RValue instead of ManagedValue, since otherwise they
would be forced to spuriously "implode" buffers.
If a value is returned as @owned, we can move the epilogue retain
to the caller and convert the return value to @unowned. This gives
ARC optimizer more freedom to optimize the retain out on the caller's
side.
It appears that epilgue retains are harder to find than epilogue
releases. Most of the time they are not in the return block.
(1) Sometimes, they are in predecessors
(2) Sometimes they come from a call which returns an @owned return value.
This should be improved if we fix (1) and go bottom up.
(3) We do not handle exploded retain_value.
Currently, this catches a small number of opportunities.
We probably need to improve epilogue retain matcher if we are to handle
more cases.
This is part of rdar://24022375.
We also need some refactoring in the pass. e.g. break functions into smaller
functions. I will do with subsequent commit.
This shaves of ~0.5 seconds from ARC when compiling the stdlib on my machine.
I wired up the cache to the delete notification trigger so we are still memory
safe.
This is similar and yet different from epilogue release matcher. Particularly
how retain is found and when to bail. Therefore this is put into a different
class than ConsumedArgToEpilogueReleaseMatcher
This is currently a NFC other than some basic testing using the epilogue dumper.
When we have all the epilogue releases. Make sure they cover all the non-trivial
parts of the base. Otherwise, treat as if we've found no releases for the base.
Currently. this is a NFC other than epilogue dumper. I will wire it up with
function signature with next commit.
This is part of rdar://22380547
So instead of only being able to match %1 and release %1 in (1). we
can also match %1 with (release %2, and release%3, i.e. exploded release_value)
in (2).
(1)
foo(%1)
strong_release %1
(2)
foo(%1)
%2 = struct_extract %1, field_a
%3 = struct_extract %1, field_b
strong_release %2
strong_release %3
This will allow function signature to better move the release instructions to
the callers.
Currently, this is a NFC other than testing using the epilogue match dumper.
