Modules occupy a weird space in the AST now: they can be treated like
types (Swift.Int), which is captured by ModuleType. They can be
treated like values for disambiguation (Swift.print), which is
captured by ModuleExpr. And we jump through hoops in various places to
store "either a module or a decl".
Start cleaning this up by transforming Module into ModuleDecl, a
TypeDecl that's implicitly created to describe a module. Subsequent
changes will start folding away the special cases (ModuleExpr ->
DeclRefExpr, name lookup results stop having a separate Module case,
etc.).
Note that the Module -> ModuleDecl typedef is there to limit the
changes needed. Much of this patch is actually dealing with the fact
that Module used to have Ctx and Name public members that now need to
be accessed via getASTContext() and getName(), respectively.
Swift SVN r28284
This can happen in witnesses, whose context archetypes are composed from the type-level archetypes of the witnessing type, and the method-level archetypes of the requirement. If you have something like:
protocol Foo {
func foo<T>(x: T)
}
struct Bar<T>: Foo {
func foo<U>(x: U)
}
Bar's witness to Foo.foo will end up with two archetypes named "T". Deal with this by having the SIL printer introduce a name mapping that disambiguates colliding archetypes. Refactor the SIL printer to do streaming through the SILPrinter itself, rather than directly on its ostream, so that we make sure it controls how subelements like types are printed, and it can pass the appropriate options down to the AST type printer. Fixes rdar://problem/20659406.
Swift SVN r27991
Now we bind the defer body into a ClosureExpr and emit it at the point of
the defer. At any exit points out of the controlled region, we emit a call
to the closure.
This should cover any problems where expressions cannot be emitted multiple times.
However, this is dramatically more complex than the obvious implementation, so I
hope this patch can be reverted.
Swift SVN r27767
If you want to make the parameter and argument label the same in
places where you don't get the argument label for free (i.e., the
first parameter of a function or a parameter of a subscript),
double-up the identifier:
func translate(dx dx: Int, dy: Int) { }
Make this a warning with Fix-Its to ease migration. Part of
rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27715
The rule changes are as follows:
* All functions (introduced with the 'func' keyword) have argument
labels for arguments beyond the first, by default. Methods are no
longer special in this regard.
* The presence of a default argument no longer implies an argument
label.
The actual changes to the parser and printer are fairly simple; the
rest of the noise is updating the standard library, overlays, tests,
etc.
With the standard library, this change is intended to be API neutral:
I've added/removed #'s and _'s as appropriate to keep the user
interface the same. If we want to separately consider using argument
labels for more free functions now that the defaults in the language
have shifted, we can tackle that separately.
Fixes rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27704
the printed interface.
Previously we printed the typechecked and uniqued requirements and the result was non-sensical.
Long-term the requirements will be preserved in a better form but for now print the requirements
and serialize them.
rdar://19963093
Swift SVN r27680
Change all uses of "do { ... } while <cond>" to use "repeat" instead.
Rename DoWhileStmt to RepeatWhileStmt. Add diagnostic suggesting change
of 'do' to 'repeat' if a condition is found afterwards.
<rdar://problem/20336424> rename do/while loops to repeat/while & introduce "repeat <count> {}" loops
Swift SVN r27650
Because of the @opened attr, they need to be parenthesized in some positions, particularly in opened existential metatypes like (@opened P).Type. This should fix the parse_stdlib validation tests.
Swift SVN r27424
This is new attribute we're using to coalesce @thin, @objc_block, and @cc, and to extend to new uses like C function pointer types. Parse the new attribute, but preserve support for the old attributes, and print with the old attributes for now to separate out test changes. Migration fixits and test updates to come. I did take the opportunity here to kill off the '@cc(cdecl)' hack for AST-level function pointer types, which are now only spelt with @convention(c).
Swift SVN r27247
These aren't really orthogonal concerns--you'll never have a @thick @cc(objc_method), or an @objc_block @cc(witness_method)--and we have gross decision trees all over the codebase that try to hopscotch between the subset of combinations that make sense. Stop the madness by eliminating AbstractCC and folding its states into SILFunctionTypeRepresentation. This cleans up a ton of code across the compiler.
I couldn't quite eliminate AbstractCC's information from AST function types, since SIL type lowering transiently created AnyFunctionTypes with AbstractCCs set, even though these never occur at the source level. To accommodate type lowering, allow AnyFunctionType::ExtInfo to carry a SILFunctionTypeRepresentation, and arrange for the overlapping representations to share raw values.
In order to avoid disturbing test output, AST and SILFunctionTypes are still printed and parsed using the existing @thin/@thick/@objc_block and @cc() attributes, which is kind of gross, but lets me stage in the real source-breaking change separately.
Swift SVN r27095
"Autoclosure" is uninteresting to SIL. "noescape" isn't currently used by SIL and we shouldn't have it until it has a meaningful effect on SIL. "throws" should be adequately represented by a SIL function type having an error result.
Swift SVN r27023
The set of attributes that make sense at the AST level is increasingly divergent from those at the SIL level, so it doesn't really make sense for these to be the same. It'll also help prevent us from accidental unwanted propagation of attributes from the AST to SIL, which has caused bugs in the past. For staging purposes, start off with SILFunctionType's versions exactly the same as the FunctionType versions, which necessitates some ugly glue code but minimizes the potential disruption.
Swift SVN r27022
Previously some parts of the compiler referred to them as "fields",
and most referred to them as "elements". Use the more generic 'elements'
nomenclature because that's what we refer to other things in the compiler
(e.g. the elements of a bracestmt).
At the same time, make the API better by providing "getElement" consistently
and using it, instead of getElements()[i].
NFC.
Swift SVN r26894
and refutable pattern bindings without an initializer.
- Enhance ASTDumper to dump where/else clauses on PBDs.
- Merge if/let conditional PBD logic into the mainline logic now that they are all
potentially conditional (more simplifications coming for this)
add tests for the fixits, which exercise the earlier SourceRange enhancments, e.g.:
x.swift:3:5: error: refutable pattern match can fail; add an else {} to handle this condition
let o? = a
^~
else {}
Swift SVN r26751
This patch introduces a new kind of pattern for matching bool literals, i.e. true and false. Essentially, it is very similar to a pattern for matching enum elements, but simpler. Most of the code is just a boiler plate code copy/pasted from the code for enum element patterns. The only different thing is the emitBoolDispatch function, which emits a SIL code for matching bools.
With this patch, we don't get any false non-exhaustive switch diagnostics for switches on bools anymore. And we have a lot of radars complaining about it. For example rdar://16514545 and rdar://20130240.
Note, that this patch fixes the non-exhaustive switch diagnostics without changing the internal representation of bools. Implementing bool as an enum would have the same effect when it comes to these diagnostics and we would get this diagnostics fix for free, i.e. without any code committed here. But implementing bools-as-enums is an ongoing work and I'm investigating its performance implications. If we become confident that bool-as-enum does not have a negative impact on performance and decide to merge it, then we can revert this patch as it would not be necessary anymore. But if we decide to skip the enum-as-bool approach to its performance issues, then we would have at least fixed the false non-exhaustive diagnostics for bools by means of this patch.
Swift SVN r26650
Remove the semantic restrictions that prohibited extensions of
protocol types, and start making some systematic changes so that
protocol extensions start to make sense:
- Replace a lot of occurrences of isa<ProtocolDecl> and
dyn_cast<ProtocolDecl> on DeclContexts to use the new
DeclContext::isProtocolOrProtocolExtensionContext(), where we want
that behavior to apply equally to protocols and protocol extensions.
- Eliminate ProtocolDecl::getSelf() in favor of
DeclContext::getProtocolSelf(), which produces the appropriate
generic type parameter for the 'Self' of a protocol or protocol
extension. Update all of the callers of ProtocolDecl::getSelf()
appropriately.
- Update extension validation to appropriately form generic
parameter lists for protocol extensions.
- Methods in protocol extensions always use the witnesscc calling
convention.
At this point, we can type check and SILGen very basic definitions of
protocol extensions with methods that can call protocol requirements,
generic free functions, and other methods within the same protocol
extension.
Regresses four compiler crashers but improves three compiler
crashers... we'll call that "progress"; the four regressions all hit
the same assertion in the constraint system that will likely be
addressed as protocol extensions starts working.
Swift SVN r26579
Rename 'assignment' attribute of infix operators to 'mutating'. Add
'has_assignment' attribute, which results in an implicit declaration of
the assignment version of the same operator. Parse "func =foo"
declaration and "foo.=bar" expression. Validate some basic properties of
in-place methods.
Not yet implemented: automatic generation of wrapper for =foo() if foo()
is implemented, or vice versa; likewise for operators.
Swift SVN r26508
Currently a no-op, but effective access for entities within the current
module will soon need to take testability into account. This declaration:
internal func foo() {}
has a formal access of 'internal', but an effective access of 'public' if
we're in a testable mode.
Part of rdar://problem/17732115 (testability)
Swift SVN r26472
When we print the name of a protocol conformance, we normally use the generic parameters as written. However, since some requirements may be inferred (particularly by an extension of a generic type), it's better for the SIL printer to use the generic signature, which is fully expanded and will also be correct, e.g., when working with a deserialized conformance.
Swift SVN r26437
This patch also introduces some SILGen infrastructure for
dividing the function into "ordinary" and "postmatter"
sections, with error-handling-like stuff going into the
final section. Currently, this is largely undermined by
SILBuilder, but I'm going to fix that in a follow-up.
Swift SVN r26422
Getting the protocols of an arbitrary type doesn't make sense, so start phasing this out by introducing specialized entry points that do make sense:
- get the inherited protocols of a ProtocolDecl
- get the conforming protocols for an associated type or generic
type parameter
- (already present) ask for the protocols to which a nominal type conforms
Swift SVN r26411
