When the LHS is an lvalue/assignable tuple and there is no leading
sequence of binary expressions.
It's a bit hacky right now since we don't have a good way to
differentiate general pattern completions from builtin operators.
rdar://problem/23209683
When auto-completing import decls, we should prioritize not-yet imported modules
over already-imported modules. To do so, we mark the latter with not-recommended tag.
Similar with @keyword, manifesting @recommended and @recommendedover content in code
completion results can help IDE users to choose the right API in the long candidate list.
This commit extract these two attributes from Clang doc comments and insert/cache them in
code completion results.
rdar://23101030 and rdar://23101029
Conventionally, code completion results are matched with user input solely by
names. However, names are limited in expressiveness. From this comments, we start to
decorate code completion results with @keywords fields extracted from Clang doc comments.
These fields are added by API authors to comment the decl with information that
is not manifested clear enough through names. Code completion users' typing of the
keyword leads to the corresponding code completion results being selected as well.
Keywords can be arbitrarily long and can be multiple.
For instance, a function called "index()" has "@keyword find" in its doc comment.
Users' typing of "find" leads to "index()" being selected in the code completion list.
Go beyond the existing keyword completions to include more literal
suggestions: 0, 0.0, "text", [item], [key: value], (item, item)
For rdar://problem/21923069
Swift SVN r32890
Peek at the token following the code completion location to decide
whether or not to provide completions for entire call patterns. When
the next token looks like it's part of an existing call we don't show
the patterns because they will "push out" the existing arguments.
We should now get:
Foo<here> => (blah, blah)
Foo(<here> => ['(']blah, blah)
Foo(<here>) => ['(']blah, blah[')']
Foo(<here>, blah) => just complete the values for arg1**
Foo(<here>blah, blah) => just complete the values for arg1
** A further improvement will be to add the argument label completion
for the first argument (if applicable) when we aren't showing a full
call pattern.
rdar://problem/22804670
Swift SVN r32765
...into separate prefix, postfix and infix operators. Also incidentally
make the whitespace around operators special so we can decide when to
skip over it. Tested in SourceKit.
Swift SVN r32468
When users invoke code completion at an argument position, we suggest argument names,
if required however not specified, or a list of argument values. These values are annotated
with their type relation to the expected argument types, so that
Xcode can prioritize those values that apply over those that do not.
This also fixes: rdar://21727063
Swift SVN r31505
We use an enum to describe the relationship between a code completion result
and the expected type at the code completion site. We can use this relationship
to prioritize candidates on the SourceKit side.
Swift SVN r31371
Completions for calling functions will now show 'throws' in the
description text so that users can differentiate throwing and
non-throwing calls. We don't insert this into the source text, since
it's not part of the call syntax.
rdar://problem/20978869
Swift SVN r28791
Modules occupy a weird space in the AST now: they can be treated like
types (Swift.Int), which is captured by ModuleType. They can be
treated like values for disambiguation (Swift.print), which is
captured by ModuleExpr. And we jump through hoops in various places to
store "either a module or a decl".
Start cleaning this up by transforming Module into ModuleDecl, a
TypeDecl that's implicitly created to describe a module. Subsequent
changes will start folding away the special cases (ModuleExpr ->
DeclRefExpr, name lookup results stop having a separate Module case,
etc.).
Note that the Module -> ModuleDecl typedef is there to limit the
changes needed. Much of this patch is actually dealing with the fact
that Module used to have Ctx and Name public members that now need to
be accessed via getASTContext() and getName(), respectively.
Swift SVN r28284
For decls, we get the most specific submodule from clang modules. For
macros, we don't yet have a way to get this information, since the
mapping from module ID to submodule is burried in the ClangImporter.
Having submodule information for macros would also help reduce the space
cost of storing the module names, since we would hit the single-element
module name cache more often.
There is no special handling of imported headers, which currently come
through with their internal clang module name '__ObjC'. Possibly these
should be treated as part of the current module.
A future commit will add the module name to swift-ide-test's output and update
the tests.
Swift SVN r26260
When trying to implement deduplication of results, found and fixed an issue
with loose checks for generic overload checking.
rdar://17995317
Swift SVN r21276
optional & alias types for closure type parameters.
This allows code completion placeholder expansion to properly expand
closure parameters utilizing a typealias, e.g. dispatch_block_t.
Update and add test for the above.
Work for <rdar://problem/15860693>.
Swift SVN r20206
if there's no parameter API name. This is for display purposes only.
Update all relevant tests accordingly.
This addresses <rdar://problem/16768768>.
For example:
class X {
func f(a: Int, b: Int) { }
}
Would previously display like this in code completion in Xcode:
f(<#Int#>, b: <#Int#>)
The local parameter name, while not API, often still conveys meaning
to the user. So it's now included like this:
f(<#a: Int#>, b: <#Int#>)
Swift SVN r18403
The leading paren is included for display purposes only, not inserted
in the code if already present. It makes the displayed text in the
code completion list symmetrical with respect to open/close parens.
Add markups when printing annotation chunks so it becomes testable.
Update tests accordingly, and include tests for leading parens.
This addresses <rdar://problem/16918310>.
Swift SVN r18126
In order for Xcode to use these completions, we complete "?.member" when the
user has typed "anOptional.", but we also say that in order to apply this
result, N bytes to the left of the cursor should be erased first.
rdar://16579657 rdar://15233283
Swift SVN r16409
